Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Safe at the Margins: A General Approach to Safety Alignment in Low-Resource English Languages -- A Singlish Case Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.12485 v2 pith:AXQ4SMOY submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords safetyalignmentsinglishapproachlanguageslow-resourceoptimizationtoxicity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensuring the safety of Large Language Models (LLMs) in diverse linguistic settings remains challenging, particularly for low-resource languages. Existing safety alignment methods are English-centric, limiting their effectiveness. We systematically compare Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), Direct Preference Optimization (DPO), and Kahneman-Tversky Optimization (KTO) for aligning SEA-Lion-v2.1-Instruct, a Llama 3-8B variant, to reduce toxicity in Singlish. Our results show that SFT+KTO achieves superior safety alignment with higher sample efficiency than DPO. Additionally, we introduce KTO-S, which enhances stability via improved KL divergence regularization. Our approach reduces Singlish toxicity by 99\%, generalizes to TOXIGEN, and maintains strong performance on standard LLM benchmarks, providing a scalable framework for safer AI deployment in multilingual contexts.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond Weaponization: NLP Security for Medium and Lower-Resourced Languages in Their Own Right

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An empirical study showing that smaller monolingual language models are more vulnerable to adversarial attacks than larger multilingual models across 70 languages, though multilinguality alone does not guarantee security.

  2. A Technical Survey of Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A survey of RL methods for LLMs that organizes the field by reward modeling, feedback source, and optimization strategy, with benchmark tables favoring a scalar-regression UNA variant over DPO and KTO in offline alignment.

Pith tools