Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Adapting Psycholinguistic Research for LLMs: Gender-inclusive Language in a Coreference Context

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13120 v1 pith:2TRXIX4G submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords languagellmsgender-inclusivegenderpsycholinguisticadaptingbiasenglish
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Gender-inclusive language is often used with the aim of ensuring that all individuals, regardless of gender, can be associated with certain concepts. While psycholinguistic studies have examined its effects in relation to human cognition, it remains unclear how Large Language Models (LLMs) process gender-inclusive language. Given that commercial LLMs are gaining an increasingly strong foothold in everyday applications, it is crucial to examine whether LLMs in fact interpret gender-inclusive language neutrally, because the language they generate has the potential to influence the language of their users. This study examines whether LLM-generated coreferent terms align with a given gender expression or reflect model biases. Adapting psycholinguistic methods from French to English and German, we find that in English, LLMs generally maintain the antecedent's gender but exhibit underlying masculine bias. In German, this bias is much stronger, overriding all tested gender-neutralization strategies.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Analyzing values about gendered language reform in LLMs' revisions

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across 14,229 revision prompts, four LLMs mostly neutralize gendered role nouns, but apply that reform unevenly depending on referent gender, explicitness, and context stereotypes, and their justifications reflect sim...

Pith tools