Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

What are Models Thinking about? Understanding Large Language Model Hallucinations "Psychology" through Model Inner State Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13490 v1 pith:ANA7NOM7 submitted 2025-02-19 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords detectioninternalstateshallucinationmodellanguagelargemodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language model (LLM) systems suffer from the models' unstable ability to generate valid and factual content, resulting in hallucination generation. Current hallucination detection methods heavily rely on out-of-model information sources, such as RAG to assist the detection, thus bringing heavy additional latency. Recently, internal states of LLMs' inference have been widely used in numerous research works, such as prompt injection detection, etc. Considering the interpretability of LLM internal states and the fact that they do not require external information sources, we introduce such states into LLM hallucination detection. In this paper, we systematically analyze different internal states' revealing features during inference forward and comprehensively evaluate their ability in hallucination detection. Specifically, we cut the forward process of a large language model into three stages: understanding, query, generation, and extracting the internal state from these stages. By analyzing these states, we provide a deep understanding of why the hallucinated content is generated and what happened in the internal state of the models. Then, we introduce these internal states into hallucination detection and conduct comprehensive experiments to discuss the advantages and limitations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Shadows in the Attention: Contextual Perturbation and Representation Drift in the Dynamics of Hallucination in LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Context injection shifts LLM hidden states and attention, and the paper claims this drift tracks and eventually "locks in" hallucination behavior, but the reported data contain internal inconsistencies.

Pith tools