REVIEW 4 cited by
Triad: Vision Foundation Model for 3D Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Vision foundation models (VFMs) are pre-trained on extensive image datasets to learn general representations for diverse types of data. These models can subsequently be fine-tuned for specific downstream tasks, significantly boosting performance across a broad range of applications. However, existing vision foundation models that claim to be applicable to various clinical tasks are mostly pre-trained on 3D computed tomography (CT), which benefits from the availability of extensive 3D CT databases. Significant differences between CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in imaging principles, signal characteristics, and data distribution may hinder their practical performance and versatility in MRI-specific applications. Here, we propose Triad, a vision foundation model for 3D MRI. Triad adopts a widely used autoencoder architecture to learn robust representations from 131,170 3D MRI volumes and uses organ-independent imaging descriptions to constrain the semantic distribution of the visual modality. The above pre-training dataset is called Triad-131K, which is currently the largest 3D MRI pre-training dataset. We evaluate Triad across three tasks, namely, organ/tumor segmentation, organ/cancer classification, and medical image registration, in two data modalities (within-domain and out-of-domain) settings using 25 downstream datasets. By initializing models with Triad's pre-trained weights, nnUNet-Triad improves segmentation performance by 2.51% compared to nnUNet-Scratch across 17 datasets. Swin-B-Triad achieves a 3.97% improvement over Swin-B-Scratch in classification tasks across five datasets. SwinUNETR-Triad improves by 4.00% compared to SwinUNETR-Scratch in registration tasks across two datasets. Our study demonstrates that pre-training can improve performance when the data modalities and organs of upstream and downstream tasks are consistent.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Topology-Driven Transferability Estimation for 3D Medical Vision Foundation Models
MST-based local boundary leakage and global topology divergence, fused by task complexity, rank SSL 3D medical encoders for segmentation without fine-tuning, beating prior TE metrics by 0.36 weighted Kendall τ at 56× speed.
-
Pan-FM: A Pan-Organ Foundation Model with Saliency-Guided Masking for Missing Robustness
Pan-FM learns balanced representations across seven organs by adaptively masking dominant organs during pre-training, yielding stronger disease prediction and missing-organ robustness than single-organ or naive multim...
-
Adapting Medical Vision Foundation Models for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentation via Active Learning and Selective Semi-supervised Fine-tuning
ASSFT combines active test-time sample selection via diversified knowledge divergence and anatomical segmentation difficulty with selective semi-supervised fine-tuning to adapt medical vision foundation models for vol...
-
Capabilities of GPT-5 on Multimodal Medical Reasoning
A benchmark study reports GPT-5 outperforming GPT-4o and pre-licensed human experts on most medical QA tasks, but not consistently on VQA-RAD.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.