REVIEW 2 cited by
Plan-over-Graph: Towards Parallelable LLM Agent Schedule
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Plan-over-Graph: Towards Parallelable LLM Agent Schedule
read the original abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional abilities in reasoning for task planning. However, challenges remain under-explored for parallel schedules. This paper introduces a novel paradigm, plan-over-graph, in which the model first decomposes a real-life textual task into executable subtasks and constructs an abstract task graph. The model then understands this task graph as input and generates a plan for parallel execution. To enhance the planning capability of complex, scalable graphs, we design an automated and controllable pipeline to generate synthetic graphs and propose a two-stage training scheme. Experimental results show that our plan-over-graph method significantly improves task performance on both API-based LLMs and trainable open-sourced LLMs. By normalizing complex tasks as graphs, our method naturally supports parallel execution, demonstrating global efficiency. The code and data are available at https://github.com/zsq259/Plan-over-Graph.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Beyond Sequential Interaction: Benchmarking Parallel Execution and Coordination for GUI Agents
A planner–worker system that splits GUI tasks across five concurrent desktop agents reaches 46.4% success on a new 233-task benchmark, but much of the gain comes from planning rather than parallelism.
-
Atomic Task Graph: A Unified Framework for Agentic Planning and Execution
ATG maintains explicit DAGs of subtasks to enable dependency tracking, parallel execution, and localized repair in LLM agents, outperforming baselines on three benchmarks with 7B-8B models.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.