Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Pitch Imperfect: Detecting Audio Deepfakes Through Acoustic Prosodic Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.14726 v1 pith:527M4S3J submitted 2025-02-20 cs.SD cs.CReess.AS

Pitch Imperfect: Detecting Audio Deepfakes Through Acoustic Prosodic Analysis

classification cs.SD cs.CReess.AS
keywords audiofeaturesdeepfakesapproachmodelmodelsprosodicspeech
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Audio deepfakes are increasingly in-differentiable from organic speech, often fooling both authentication systems and human listeners. While many techniques use low-level audio features or optimization black-box model training, focusing on the features that humans use to recognize speech will likely be a more long-term robust approach to detection. We explore the use of prosody, or the high-level linguistic features of human speech (e.g., pitch, intonation, jitter) as a more foundational means of detecting audio deepfakes. We develop a detector based on six classical prosodic features and demonstrate that our model performs as well as other baseline models used by the community to detect audio deepfakes with an accuracy of 93% and an EER of 24.7%. More importantly, we demonstrate the benefits of using a linguistic features-based approach over existing models by applying an adaptive adversary using an $L_{\infty}$ norm attack against the detectors and using attention mechanisms in our training for explainability. We show that we can explain the prosodic features that have highest impact on the model's decision (Jitter, Shimmer and Mean Fundamental Frequency) and that other models are extremely susceptible to simple $L_{\infty}$ norm attacks (99.3% relative degradation in accuracy). While overall performance may be similar, we illustrate the robustness and explainability benefits to a prosody feature approach to audio deepfake detection.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. If It's Good Enough for You, It's Good Enough for Me: Transferability of Audio Sufficiencies across Models

    cs.SD 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Transferability analysis finds that minimal sufficient signals transfer across audio models at rates varying by task, around 26% for music genre classification, with some deepfake models showing distinct behaviors not...

  2. ProSDD: Learning Prosodic Representations for Speech Deepfake Detection against Expressive and Emotional Attacks

    eess.AS 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ProSDD learns speaker-conditioned prosodic variation from real speech via supervised masked prediction and jointly optimizes it with spoof detection, cutting EER substantially on ASVspoof 2024 and emotional datasets.

  3. MOSAIC: Interpretable Multi-Token Cross-Attention of Biophonetic and Self-Supervised Representations for Unified Voice Anti-Spoofing

    eess.AS 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5

    Multi-token cross-attention of six biophonetic query groups over thirteen WavLM layers yields a unified anti-spoofing model with cue-to-layer interpretability and 1.93%/1.98% EER on ASVspoof 2019 LA/PA.