REVIEW 1 cited by
Do we really need the Rademacher complexities?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We study the fundamental problem of learning with respect to the squared loss in a convex class. The state-of-the-art sample complexity estimates in this setting rely on Rademacher complexities, which are generally difficult to control. We prove that, contrary to prevailing belief and under minimal assumptions, the sample complexity is not governed by the Rademacher complexities but rather by the behaviour of the limiting gaussian process. In particular, all such learning problems that have the same $L_2$-structure -- even those with heavy-tailed distributions -- share the same sample complexity. This constitutes the first universality result for general convex learning problems. The proof is based on a novel learning procedure, and its performance is studied by combining optimal mean estimation techniques for real-valued random variables with Talagrand's generic chaining method.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Statistical Guarantees for Reasoning Probes on Looped Boolean Circuits
GCN-parameterized reasoning probes on looped ν-ary Boolean circuits achieve O(1/√N) transductive generalization error with high probability, independent of circuit size when the snowflake loss exponent α≍1/h.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.