pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.15490 · v1 · pith:C3DIBOFNnew · submitted 2025-02-21 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.other

Cavity QED Control of Quantum Hall Stripes

Lorenzo Graziotto , Josefine Enkner , Sambuddha Chattopadhyay , Jonathan B. Curtis , Ethan Koskas , Christian Reichl , Werner Wegscheider , Giacomo Scalari
show 2 more authors
Eugene Demler J\'er\^ome Faist
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 02:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.other
keywords cavity QEDquantum Hall stripestwo-dimensional electron gasmagnetotransportvacuum fluctuationscorrelated phases
0
0 comments X

The pith

Vacuum fluctuations in a cavity stabilize quantum Hall stripes and suppress longitudinal resistance below the zero-field value.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports magnetotransport measurements on a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas placed inside an engineered cavity. At temperatures below 200 mK and magnetic fields between quantized Hall plateaus, the cavity produces transport anisotropies and reduces longitudinal resistance. The authors attribute these changes to the cavity vacuum field fluctuations stabilizing thermally disordered quantum Hall stripes. A sympathetic reader would see this as evidence that vacuum electromagnetic fluctuations can control a correlated electronic phase without external light.

Core claim

Magnetotransport measurements show striking cavity-induced anisotropies in electronic transport, including suppression of the longitudinal resistance well below the resistivity at zero magnetic field. These effects occur at ultra-low temperatures when the magnetic field lies between quantized Hall plateaus. The results are interpreted as arising from the stabilization of thermally-disordered quantum Hall stripes by cavity vacuum fluctuations.

What carries the argument

Stabilization of thermally-disordered quantum Hall stripes by vacuum electromagnetic field fluctuations inside the cavity.

If this is right

  • Cavity engineering provides a route to modify transport in the quantum Hall stripe regime.
  • Resistance suppression occurs specifically between Hall plateaus at temperatures below 200 mK.
  • This constitutes a demonstration that cavity QED can control a correlated electronic phase.
  • The control relies on vacuum fluctuations rather than applied fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar stabilization might occur for other stripe or nematic orders in two-dimensional systems if placed in appropriate cavities.
  • Changing cavity geometry or resonance could allow tunable control over the strength of the effect.
  • The approach suggests experiments on how vacuum fluctuations influence phase transitions in other correlated materials.

Load-bearing premise

The observed transport anisotropies and resistance suppression arise specifically from cavity stabilization of quantum Hall stripes rather than from other cavity-modified scattering, heating, or measurement artifacts.

What would settle it

The same resistance suppression and anisotropies appearing in a cavity-free sample or when the cavity frequency is detuned from the relevant electronic modes would falsify the stabilization claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.15490 by Christian Reichl, Ethan Koskas, Eugene Demler, Giacomo Scalari, J\'er\^ome Faist, Jonathan B. Curtis, Josefine Enkner, Lorenzo Graziotto, Sambuddha Chattopadhyay, Werner Wegscheider.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Controlling quantum phases of materials with vacuum field fluctuations in engineered cavities is a novel route towards the optical control of emergent phenomena. We demonstrate, using magnetotransport measurements of a high-mobility two-dimensional electron gas, striking cavity-induced anisotropies in the electronic transport, including the suppression of the longitudinal resistance well below the resistivity at zero magnetic field. Our cavity-induced effects occur at ultra-low temperatures (< 200 mK) when the magnetic field lies between quantized Hall plateaus. We interpret our results as arising from the stabilization of thermally-disordered quantum Hall stripes. Our work presents a clear demonstration of the cavity QED control of a correlated electronic phase.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents magnetotransport data on a high-mobility 2DEG placed in a cavity, reporting cavity-induced transport anisotropies and a suppression of longitudinal resistance below the zero-field value at T < 200 mK when the magnetic field lies between quantized Hall plateaus. The central interpretation is that these effects arise from cavity-vacuum stabilization of thermally disordered quantum Hall stripes, constituting a demonstration of cavity QED control over a correlated electronic phase.

Significance. If the attribution to stripe stabilization is confirmed with appropriate controls, the result would constitute a significant experimental step in cavity QED applied to strongly correlated systems, offering a route to influence emergent phases via vacuum fluctuations rather than external drives. The low-temperature inter-plateau regime is a natural setting for such effects, and successful isolation of the mechanism could motivate quantitative theory and further cavity-engineered experiments.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (interpretation paragraph): the assignment of the observed resistance suppression and anisotropies specifically to stabilization of quantum Hall stripes is presented without reference to controls that exclude generic cavity-modified scattering, dielectric shifts, or local heating. This attribution is load-bearing for the central claim yet remains under-determined by the transport data alone.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative link is provided between the reported resistance drop and any predicted signature of stripe order (e.g., expected anisotropy ratio, temperature scaling, or comparison to zero-cavity stripe phenomenology), leaving the interpretation reliant on post-hoc assignment rather than falsifiable tests.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below. Where the comments correctly identify areas for clarification in the abstract, we have revised the manuscript to strengthen the presentation while preserving the central interpretation supported by the data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (interpretation paragraph): the assignment of the observed resistance suppression and anisotropies specifically to stabilization of quantum Hall stripes is presented without reference to controls that exclude generic cavity-modified scattering, dielectric shifts, or local heating. This attribution is load-bearing for the central claim yet remains under-determined by the transport data alone.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary; the main text (Sections III and IV) details the field-range specificity (inter-plateau only), temperature threshold (<200 mK), and absence of similar effects in control samples without the cavity. These features distinguish the observations from generic cavity-modified scattering, dielectric shifts, or local heating. We have revised the abstract to reference this regime specificity and the controls discussed in the main text, thereby clarifying the basis for the stripe-stabilization interpretation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no quantitative link is provided between the reported resistance drop and any predicted signature of stripe order (e.g., expected anisotropy ratio, temperature scaling, or comparison to zero-cavity stripe phenomenology), leaving the interpretation reliant on post-hoc assignment rather than falsifiable tests.

    Authors: The observed anisotropy ratio and the temperature scaling of the resistance suppression are consistent with the phenomenology of quantum Hall stripes reported in zero-cavity literature. We have revised the abstract to include a brief quantitative link to these signatures (anisotropy ratios and temperature dependence) and have expanded the corresponding comparison in the main text, making the connection to stripe order more explicit and falsifiable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations with separate interpretation

full rationale

The manuscript reports magnetotransport data on a 2DEG in a cavity and interprets cavity-induced resistance anisotropies and suppression (at T<200 mK, between Hall plateaus) as stabilization of thermally disordered quantum Hall stripes. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are present that reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The interpretation is explicitly labeled as such and does not rely on self-citations or ansatzes that close on themselves. This is a standard experimental claim whose validity can be assessed against external controls and benchmarks; no load-bearing step collapses to a tautology.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is experimental and relies on standard assumptions of 2DEG physics and cavity QED without introducing new free parameters or entities in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Established theory of quantum Hall effect and stripe phases in 2DEGs at low temperature
    Invoked to interpret the field range between plateaus and the role of thermal disorder.
  • domain assumption Cavity vacuum fluctuations can couple to electronic degrees of freedom in a 2DEG
    Central to the cavity QED control claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1087 out tokens · 26680 ms · 2026-05-23T02:41:04.318463+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Fluctuation engineering in cavity quantum materials

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A review that organizes the field of cavity quantum materials around a fluctuation-focused perspective, surveying design tools, recent milestones, and challenges for controlling quantum orders in various platforms.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Basov, R

    D. Basov, R. Averitt, and D. Hsieh, Towards properties on demand in quantum materials, Nature materials16, 1077 (2017). 6

    work page 2017

  2. [2]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science 373, eabd0336 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Hübener, U

    H. Hübener, U. De Giovannini, C. Schäfer, J. Andberger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engineering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nature materials 20, 438 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    I.-T. Lu, D. Shin, M. K. Svendsen, S. Latini, H. Hübener, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cavity engineering of solid-state materials without external driving, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.03172 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    P. W. Milonni,The quantum vacuum: an introduction to quantum electrodynamics(Academic press, 2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    H. B. Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conductingplates,in Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wet.,Vol.51 (1948) p. 793

    work page 1948

  7. [7]

    W. E. Lamb and R. C. Retherford, Fine structure of the hydrogen atom by a microwave method, Phys. Rev.72, 241 (1947)

    work page 1947

  8. [8]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. İmamoğlu, J. Faist, D. Jaksch, A. Caval- leri, and E. Demler, Quantum electrodynamic control of matter: Cavity-enhanced ferroelectric phase transition, Physical Review X10, 041027 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    J. B. Curtis, M. H. Michael, and E. Demler, Local fluc- tuations in cavity control of ferroelectricity, Physical Re- view Research5, 043118 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Schäfer, U. D. Gio- vannini, H. Hübener, and A. Rubio, The ferroelectric photogroundstateofSrTiO3: Cavitymaterialsengineer- ing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America118, e2105618118 (2021), 2101.11313

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- mediated electron-photon superconductivity, Physical re- view letters122, 133602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Science Advances4, eaau6969 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity Quantum Eliashberg Enhance- ment of Superconductivity, Physical Review Letters122, 167002 (2019), 1805.01482

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    A. A. Allocca, Z. M. Raines, J. B. Curtis, and V. M. Gal- itski, Cavity superconductor-polaritons, Physical Review B 99, 020504 (2019), 1807.06601

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Gal- itski, Cavity Higgs polaritons, Physical Review Research 2, 013143 (2020), 1905.03377

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Román-Roche, F

    J. Román-Roche, F. Luis, and D. Zueco, Photon conden- sation and enhanced magnetism in cavity qed, Physical review letters127, 167201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic,et al., Cavity-mediated ther- mal control of metal-to-insulator transition in 1t-tas2, Nature 622, 487 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum hall effect, Sci- ence 375, 1030 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    Giuliani and G

    G. Giuliani and G. Vignale, Quantum Theory of the Electron Liquid Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ(Press, 2005)

    work page 2005

  20. [21]

    S. M. Girvin and K. Yang,Modern Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [22]

    M. M. Fogler, Stripe and bubble phases in quantum hall systems, inHigh Magnetic Fields: Applications in Con- densed Matter Physics and Spectroscopy(Springer, 2002) pp. 98–138

    work page 2002

  22. [23]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, M. J. Lawler, J. P. Eisenstein, and A. P. Mackenzie, Nematic fermi fluids in condensed matter physics, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.1, 153 (2010)

    work page 2010

  23. [24]

    Cooper, M

    K. Cooper, M. Lilly, J. Eisenstein, T. Jungwirth, L. Pfeif- fer, and K. West, An investigation of orientational symmetry-breaking mechanisms in high landau levels, Solid state communications119, 89 (2001)

    work page 2001

  24. [26]

    W. Pan, T. Jungwirth, H. Stormer, D. Tsui, A. MacDon- ald, S. Girvin, L. Smrcka, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin, and K. West, Reorientation of anisotropy in a square well quantum hall sample, Physical Review Letters85, 3257 (2000)

    work page 2000

  25. [27]

    Q. Shi, M. Zudov, Q. Qian, J. Watson, and M. Man- fra, Effect of density on quantum hall stripe orientation in tilted magnetic fields, Physical Review B95, 161303 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [28]

    Lilly, K

    M. Lilly, K. Cooper, J. Eisenstein, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Evidence for an anisotropic state of two- dimensional electrons in high landau levels, Physical Re- view Letters82, 394 (1999)

    work page 1999

  27. [29]

    R. Du, D. Tsui, H. Stormer, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin, and K. West, Strongly anisotropic transport in higher two- dimensional landau levels, Solid State Communications 109, 389 (1999)

    work page 1999

  28. [30]

    See Supplementary Material

    work page

  29. [31]

    G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, F. Appugliese, E. Richter, F. Valmorra, J. Keller, M. Beck, N. Bartolo, C. Rössler, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin,et al., Magneto-transport controlled by landau polariton states, Nature Physics 15, 186 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [32]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nature Reviews Physics1, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [33]

    Wexler and A

    C. Wexler and A. T. Dorsey, Disclination unbinding tran- sition in quantum hall liquid crystals, Physical Review B 64, 115312 (2001)

    work page 2001

  32. [34]

    Wang and V

    J. Wang and V. Goldman, Measurements and modeling of nonlocal resistance in the fractional quantum hall ef- fect, Physical Review B45, 13479 (1992)

    work page 1992

  33. [35]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, F. Appugliese, V. Rokaj, J. Wang, M. Ruggenthaler, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, A. Rubio, and J. Faist, Testing the renormalization of the von klitzing constant by cavity vacuum fields, Phys- ical Review X14, 021038 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [36]

    Bordag, G

    M. Bordag, G. L. Klimchitskaya, U. Mohideen, and V. M. Mostepanenko, Advances in the Casimir effect, Vol. 145 7 (OUP Oxford, 2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [37]

    Altland and B

    A. Altland and B. Simons,Condensed Matter Field The- ory, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [39]

    T. D. Stanescu, I. Martin, and P. Phillips, Finite- temperature density instability at high landau level oc- cupancy, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1288 (2000)

    work page 2000

  37. [40]

    A. S. Disa, T. F. Nova, and A. Cavalleri, Engineering crystal structures with light, Nature Physics 17, 1087 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [41]

    E. Y. Andrei, D. K. Efetov, P. Jarillo-Herrero, A. H. MacDonald, K.F.Mak, T.Senthil, E.Tutuc, A.Yazdani, and A. F. Young, The marvels of moiré materials, Nature Reviews Materials6, 201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  39. [42]

    I. V. Kukushkin, V. Umansky, K. von Klitzing, and J. H. Smet, Collective modes and the periodicity of quantum hall stripes, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 206804 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [43]

    M. Liu, A. J. Sternbach, and D. Basov, Nanoscale elec- trodynamics of strongly correlated quantum materials, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 014501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [44]

    Ilani, J

    S. Ilani, J. Martin, E. Teitelbaum, J. Smet, D. Mahalu, V. Umansky, and A. Yacoby, The microscopic nature of localization in the quantum hall effect, Physica E: Low- dimensional Systems and Nanostructures25, 219 (2004). Supplement ar y Ma terial Cavity QED Control of Quantum Hall Stripes Lorenzo Graziotto,1, 2,∗Josefine Enkner,1, 2 Sambuddha Chattopadhyay...

    work page 2004

  42. [45]

    Second sample processed on D170202B (D170202B-1) 20 ∗lgraziotto@phys.ethz.ch †jerome.faist@phys.ethz.ch arXiv:2502.15490v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 21 Feb 2025 2

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  43. [46]

    Sample processed on D170209B (D170209B-1-40B) 21

    work page

  44. [47]

    Sample processed on D200923 (D200923-Scs#1) 22

    work page

  45. [48]

    Sample processed on D151202B (D151202B) 23

    work page

  46. [49]

    [1] 23 VII

    Sample processed on D151202B, investigated in Ref. [1] 23 VII. Temperature study of the odd-integer filling factor minima 25 VIII. Theoretical Interpretation 28 A. Generic Formulation 28 B. Stripe Anisotropy 29 References 30 I. MATERIAL AND METHODS A. Heterostructure details The two-dimensional electron system (2DES) is hosted in a24 nm-wide GaAs/AlGasAs ...

    work page

  47. [50]

    Definition of the Hall bars and of the square patch using positive resist (AZ1505) and high- resolution direct laser writing

    work page

  48. [51]

    Etching of the mesa region using a diluted piranha solution (H2SO4:H2O2(30%):H2O 1:8:60)

    work page

  49. [52]

    Definition of the contacts using negative image-reversal resist (AZ5214E) and high-resolution direct laser writing

    work page

  50. [53]

    Evaporation of Ge/Au/Ge/Au/Ni/Au (26/53/26/53/40/50nm) eutectic mixture, lift-off and annealing (500◦C for 300 s)

    work page

  51. [54]

    Definition of the resonator plane using negative image-reversal resist (AZ5214E) and high- resolution direct laser writing

    work page

  52. [55]

    Evaporation of Ti/Au (10/200nm) and lift-off. C. Measurement scheme The transport measurements are performed with state-of-the-art techniques optimized for in- vestigating the quantum Hall effect in two-dimensional electron systems [2]. We cool the samples down to 12 mK with a Bluefors dilution refrigerator. The voltage is measured with commercial MFLI Zu...

    work page

  53. [56]

    The only difference thus comes from the slightly lower density gradient, due to the different physical position on the heterostructure wafer (the photolitography mask is identical)

    Second sample processed on D170202B (D170202B-1) We fabricated the sample presented in the main text and this one on the same chip, and then cleaved it afterwards. The only difference thus comes from the slightly lower density gradient, due to the different physical position on the heterostructure wafer (the photolitography mask is identical). In Fig. S13...

    work page

  54. [57]

    Sample processed on D170209B (D170209B-1-40B) This sample was one of the very first where the suppression of resistivity at half-integer filling factors in the cavity-embedded Hall bar was observed. It was processed and first measured in 2018, and then remeasured in 2023, with a vastly updated experimental setup: we changed the superconducting Helmholtz c...

    work page 2018

  55. [58]

    Sample processed on D200923 (D200923-Scs#1) This sample was processed on a different heterostructure and employing a different design of the resonator with respect to the one presented in the main text. The heterostructure contains a 27 nm-wide square quantum well, with a80 nm spacer from the doping layer, and the 2DES has density 3.2×1011 cm−2 and mobili...

    work page

  56. [59]

    CSRR", blue solid line), and the variation of the latter having serrated edges (

    Sample processed on D151202B (D151202B) Also this sample was processed on another different heterostructure, which contains a30 nm- wide square quantum well, with a100 nmspacer from the doping layer, and the 2DES has density 2.1×1011 cm−2 and mobility 1.7×107 cm2V−1s−1 (measured at 1.3 Kwithout illumination). The cavity design is again a CSRR, with180 GHz...

    work page

  57. [60]

    easy" and a “hard

    Sample processed on D151202B, investigated in Ref. [1] The heterostructure from which this sample was fabricated is the same one of Section VID4. The details on the cavity design and measurement technique are reported in detail in Ref. [1]. Here we limit ourselves to report in Figure S17 the longitudinal resistivity as a function of magnetic field at valu...

    work page

  58. [61]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Boriçi, F. Appugliese, C. Reichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Enhanced fractional quantum hall gaps in a two-dimensional electron gas coupled to a hovering split-ring resonator, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18362 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  59. [62]

    Baer and K

    S. Baer and K. Ensslin,Transport spectroscopy of confined fractional quantum hall systems, Vol. 183 (Springer, 2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [63]

    Lilly, K

    M. Lilly, K. Cooper, J. Eisenstein, L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Evidence for an anisotropic state of two- dimensional electrons in high landau levels, Physical Review Letters82, 394 (1999)

    work page 1999

  61. [64]

    R. Du, D. Tsui, H. Stormer, L. Pfeiffer, K. Baldwin, and K. West, Strongly anisotropic transport in higher two-dimensional landau levels, Solid State Communications109, 389 (1999)

    work page 1999

  62. [65]

    R. Ilan, N. R. Cooper, and A. Stern, Longitudinal resistance of a quantum hall system with a density gradient, Phys. Rev. B73, 235333 (2006)

    work page 2006

  63. [66]

    Buttiker, Symmetry of electrical conduction, IBM Journal of Research and Development32, 317 (1988)

    M. Buttiker, Symmetry of electrical conduction, IBM Journal of Research and Development32, 317 (1988)

    work page 1988

  64. [67]

    evidence for an anisotropic state of two-dimensional electrons in high landau levels

    S. H. Simon, Comment on “evidence for an anisotropic state of two-dimensional electrons in high landau levels”, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 4223 (1999)

    work page 1999

  65. [68]

    S. P. Koduvayur, Y. Lyanda-Geller, S. Khlebnikov, G. Csathy, M. J. Manfra, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and L. P. Rokhinson, Effect of strain on stripe phases in the quantum hall regime, Physical Review Letters106, 016804 (2011)

    work page 2011

  66. [69]

    Willett, K

    R. Willett, K. West, and L. Pfeiffer, Current-path properties of the transport anisotropy at filling factor 9/2, Physical Review Letters87, 196805 (2001)

    work page 2001

  67. [70]

    Dykhne and I

    A. Dykhne and I. Ruzin, Theory of the fractional quantum hall effect: The two-phase model, Physical Review B50, 2369 (1994)

    work page 1994

  68. [71]

    von Oppen, B

    F. von Oppen, B. I. Halperin, and A. Stern, Conductivity tensor of striped quantum hall phases, Physical Review Letters84, 2937 (2000)

    work page 2000

  69. [72]

    Sammon, X

    M. Sammon, X. Fu, Y. Huang, M. A. Zudov, B. I. Shklovskii, G. C. Gardner, J. D. Watson, M. J. Manfra, K. W. Baldwin, L. N. Pfeiffer,et al., Resistivity anisotropy of quantum hall stripe phases, Physical Review B100, 241303 (2019)

    work page 2019

  70. [73]

    Abanin, S

    D. Abanin, S. Morozov, L. Ponomarenko, R. Gorbachev, A. Mayorov, M. Katsnelson, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. Novoselov, L. Levitov,et al., Giant nonlocality near the dirac point in graphene, Science 332, 328 (2011). 31

    work page 2011

  71. [74]

    Wang and V

    J. Wang and V. Goldman, Measurements and modeling of nonlocal resistance in the fractional quantum hall effect, Physical Review B45, 13479 (1992)

    work page 1992

  72. [75]

    McEuen, A

    P. McEuen, A. Szafer, C. Richter, B. Alphenaar, J. Jain, A. Stone, R. Wheeler, and R. Sacks, New resistivity for high-mobility quantum hall conductors, Physical review letters64, 2062 (1990)

    work page 2062

  73. [76]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cavity vacuum fields in the integer quantum hall effect, Science375, 1030 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [77]

    Szafer, A

    A. Szafer, A. D. Stone, P. McEuen, and B. Alphenaar, Network models of the quantum hall effect, Granular Nanoelectronics , 195 (1991)

    work page 1991

  75. [78]

    Büttiker, Absence of backscattering in the quantum hall effect in multiprobe conductors, Physical Review B38, 9375 (1988)

    M. Büttiker, Absence of backscattering in the quantum hall effect in multiprobe conductors, Physical Review B38, 9375 (1988)

    work page 1988

  76. [79]

    Scalari, C

    G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Turčinková, D. Hagenmüller, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, C. Reichl, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, M. Beck,et al., Ultrastrong coupling of the cyclotron transition of a 2d electron gas to a thz metamaterial, Science335, 1323 (2012)

    work page 2012

  77. [80]

    Ciuti, Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum hall systems, Physical Review B 104, 155307 (2021)

    C. Ciuti, Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum hall systems, Physical Review B 104, 155307 (2021)

    work page 2021

  78. [81]

    Nicholas, R

    R. Nicholas, R. Haug, K. v. Klitzing, and G. Weimann, Exchange enhancement of the spin splitting in a gaas-ga x al 1- x as heterojunction, Physical Review B37, 1294 (1988)

    work page 1988

  79. [82]

    Matthews and M

    J. Matthews and M. Cage, Temperature dependence of the hall and longitudinal resistances in a quan- tum hall resistance standard, Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 110, 497 (2005)

    work page 2005

  80. [83]

    Janak, g factor of the two-dimensional interacting electron gas, Physical Review178, 1416 (1969)

    J. Janak, g factor of the two-dimensional interacting electron gas, Physical Review178, 1416 (1969)

    work page 1969

Showing first 80 references.