REVIEW 1 cited by
Rectifying Conformity Scores for Better Conditional Coverage
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
We present a new method for generating confidence sets within the split conformal prediction framework. Our method performs a trainable transformation of any given conformity score to improve conditional coverage while ensuring exact marginal coverage. The transformation is based on an estimate of the conditional quantile of conformity scores. The resulting method is particularly beneficial for constructing adaptive confidence sets in multi-output problems where standard conformal quantile regression approaches have limited applicability. We develop a theoretical bound that captures the influence of the accuracy of the quantile estimate on the approximate conditional validity, unlike classical bounds for conformal prediction methods that only offer marginal coverage. We experimentally show that our method is highly adaptive to the local data structure and outperforms existing methods in terms of conditional coverage, improving the reliability of statistical inference in various applications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
CP4SBI: Local Conformal Calibration of Credible Sets in Simulation-Based Inference
CP4SBI applies local conformal calibration (regression-tree and conditional-CDF variants) to credible sets from simulation-based inference, yielding finite-sample local and asymptotic conditional coverage for any post...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.