REVIEW 2 cited by
Instruction-Tuning LLMs for Event Extraction with Annotation Guidelines
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In this work, we study the effect of annotation guidelines -- textual descriptions of event types and arguments, when instruction-tuning large language models for event extraction. We conducted a series of experiments with both human-provided and machine-generated guidelines in both full- and low-data settings. Our results demonstrate the promise of annotation guidelines when there is a decent amount of training data and highlight its effectiveness in improving cross-schema generalization and low-frequency event-type performance.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ChunkLLM: A Lightweight Pluggable Framework for Accelerating LLMs Inference
ChunkLLM adds lightweight chunk-boundary and chunk-attention adapters to frozen LLMs, keeping ~98% of long-context quality with ~49% KV cache and up to 4.48x speedup on 120K-token generation.
-
Reflective Agreement: Combining Self-Mixture of Agents with a Sequence Tagger for Robust Event Extraction
ARIS combines self-mixture-of-agents LLM decoding with a RoBERTa sequence tagger, consensus detection, confidence filtering, and LLM reflection to improve event extraction F1, but its headline SOTA claim is not suppor...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.