Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Revisiting Convolution Architecture in the Realm of DNA Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.18538 v1 pith:BPHRFFHO submitted 2025-02-25 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords convnovafoundationrecentcnnsmethodsmodelmodelsapproaches
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In recent years, a variety of methods based on Transformer and state space model (SSM) architectures have been proposed, advancing foundational DNA language models. However, there is a lack of comparison between these recent approaches and the classical architecture convolutional networks (CNNs) on foundation model benchmarks. This raises the question: are CNNs truly being surpassed by these recent approaches based on transformer and SSM architectures? In this paper, we develop a simple but well-designed CNN-based method termed ConvNova. ConvNova identifies and proposes three effective designs: 1) dilated convolutions, 2) gated convolutions, and 3) a dual-branch framework for gating mechanisms. Through extensive empirical experiments, we demonstrate that ConvNova significantly outperforms recent methods on more than half of the tasks across several foundation model benchmarks. For example, in histone-related tasks, ConvNova exceeds the second-best method by an average of 5.8%, while generally utilizing fewer parameters and enabling faster computation. In addition, the experiments observed findings that may be related to biological characteristics. This indicates that CNNs are still a strong competitor compared to Transformers and SSMs. We anticipate that this work will spark renewed interest in CNN-based methods for DNA foundation models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. DNA Language Models: An Assessment of Pre-Training for Fine-Tuning Tasks

    q-bio.GN 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Benchmark assessment of pretraining contribution and BPE tokenization in transformer versus convolutional DNA language models for genomics fine-tuning tasks.

Pith tools