Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Comparison of encoding schemes for quantum computing of $S > 1/2$ spin chains

Quantum Physics · Submitted 26 Feb 2025

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The Dicke mapping, in which the spin states are encoded as superpositions of multi-qubit states, is found to be the most efficient because of the small number of terms in the qubit Hamiltonian.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2502.18838 (version 2)
Pith IDR5LOTNUP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationErik L\"otstedt, Kaoru Yamanouchi. "Comparison of encoding schemes for quantum computing of $S > 1/2$ spin chains." arXiv:2502.18838 (2025). https://pith.science/paper/R5LOTNUP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 4,431 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.03 · states limitation 0.23 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.18 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.56 · compares with prior results 0.77 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We compare four different encoding schemes for the quantum computing of spin chains with a spin quantum number $S>1/2$: a compact mapping, a direct (or one-hot) mapping, a Dicke mapping, and a qudit mapping. The three different qubit encoding schemes are assessed by conducting Hamiltonian simulation for $1/2 \le S \le 5/2$ using a trapped-ion quantum computer. The qudit mapping is tested by running simulations with a simple noise model. The Dicke mapping, in which the spin states are encoded as superpositions of multi-qubit states, is found to be the most efficient because of the small number of terms in the qubit Hamiltonian. We also investigate the $S$-dependence of the time step length $\Delta\tau$ in the Suzuki-Trotter approximation and find that, in order to obtain the same accuracy for all $S$, $\Delta\tau$ should be inversely proportional to $S$.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We compare four different encoding schemes for the quantum computing of spin chains with a spin quantum number $S>1/2$: a compact mapping, a direct (or one-hot) mapping, a Dicke mapping, and a qudit mapping. contribution 0.97 0.83 0.04 asserted 0.84
s1 The three different qubit encoding schemes are assessed by conducting Hamiltonian simulation for $1/2 \le S \le 5/2$ using a trapped-ion quantum computer. method 0.98 0.94 0.04 asserted 0.99
s2 The qudit mapping is tested by running simulations with a simple noise model. method 0.99 0.93 0.02 asserted 0.89
s3 The Dicke mapping, in which the spin states are encoded as superpositions of multi-qubit states, is found to be the most efficient because of the small number of terms in the qubit Hamiltonian. result 0.99 0.95 0.77 asserted 1.00
s4 We also investigate the $S$-dependence of the time step length $\Delta\tau$ in the Suzuki-Trotter approximation and find that, in order to obtain the same accuracy for all $S$, $\Delta\tau$ should be inversely proportional to $S$. result 0.99 0.96 0.13 asserted 1.00

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: simulation study 1.00 · evidence from simulation or computation 0.97.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We compare four different encoding schemes for the quantum computing of spin chains with a spin quantum number $S>1/2$: a compact mapping, a direct (or one-hot) mapping, a Dicke mapping, and a qudit mapping. The three different qubit encoding schemes are assessed by conducting Hamiltonian simulation for $1/2 \le S \le 5/2$ using a trapped-ion quantum computer. The qudit mapping is tested by running simulations with a simple noise model. The Dicke mapping, in which the spin states are encoded as superpositions of multi-qubit states, is found to be the most efficient because of the small number of terms in the qubit Hamiltonian. We also investigate the $S$-dependence of the time step length $\Delta\tau$ in the Suzuki-Trotter approximation and find that, in order to obtain the same accuracy for all $S$, $\Delta\tau$ should be inversely proportional to $S$.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites as background 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.