REVIEW 2 cited by
Multi-Agent Security Tax: Trading Off Security and Collaboration Capabilities in Multi-Agent Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
As AI agents are increasingly adopted to collaborate on complex objectives, ensuring the security of autonomous multi-agent systems becomes crucial. We develop simulations of agents collaborating on shared objectives to study these security risks and security trade-offs. We focus on scenarios where an attacker compromises one agent, using it to steer the entire system toward misaligned outcomes by corrupting other agents. In this context, we observe infectious malicious prompts - the multi-hop spreading of malicious instructions. To mitigate this risk, we evaluated several strategies: two "vaccination" approaches that insert false memories of safely handling malicious input into the agents' memory stream, and two versions of a generic safety instruction strategy. While these defenses reduce the spread and fulfillment of malicious instructions in our experiments, they tend to decrease collaboration capability in the agent network. Our findings illustrate potential trade-off between security and collaborative efficiency in multi-agent systems, providing insights for designing more secure yet effective AI collaborations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Mind Viruses: Self-Propagating Ideas in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
Evolved self-propagating prompt payloads spread between LLM agents in two simulated settings, with harmful payloads less transmissible and a system-prompt warning conferring near-total immunity.
-
On Understanding, Identifying, and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Models
A PRISMA-based survey of 85 papers shows agentic LLM security research is attack-heavy and perception-focused, leaving action-layer and code-execution risks understudied.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.