Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Nonmonotone higher-order Taylor approximation methods for composite problems

Optimization and Control · Submitted 3 Mar 2025

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our method achieves the same nice global and rate of convergence properties as traditional higher-order methods while eliminating the need for global Lipschitz continuity assumptions, strict descent condition, or explicit boundedness of the iterates.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2503.01182 (version 1)
Pith IDT2VJFABP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationYassine Nabou. "Nonmonotone higher-order Taylor approximation methods for composite problems." arXiv:2503.01182 (2025). https://pith.science/paper/T2VJFABP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,665 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.40 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.08 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.97 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

We study composite optimization problems in which the smooth part of the objective function is \( p \)-times continuously differentiable, where \( p \geq 1 \) is an integer. Higher-order methods are known to be effective for solving such problems, as they speed up convergence rates. These methods often require, or implicitly ensure, a monotonic decrease in the objective function across iterations. Maintaining this monotonicity typically requires that the \( p \)-th derivative of the smooth part of the objective function is globally Lipschitz or that the generated iterates remain bounded. In this paper, we propose nonmonotone higher-order Taylor approximation (NHOTA) method for composite problems. Our method achieves the same nice global and rate of convergence properties as traditional higher-order methods while eliminating the need for global Lipschitz continuity assumptions, strict descent condition, or explicit boundedness of the iterates. Specifically, for nonconvex composite problems, we derive global convergence rate to a stationary point of order \( \mathcal{O}(k^{-\frac{p}{p+1}}) \), where \( k \) is the iteration counter. Moreover, when the objective function satisfies the Kurdyka-{\L}ojasiewicz (KL) property, we obtain improved rates that depend on the KL parameter. Furthermore, for convex composite problems, our method achieves sublinear convergence rate of order \( \mathcal{O}(k^{-p}) \) in function values. Finally, preliminary numerical experiments on nonconvex phase retrieval problems highlight the promising performance of the proposed approach.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 We study composite optimization problems in which the smooth part of the objective function is \( p \)-times continuously differentiable, where \( p \geq 1 \) is an integer. background 0.98 0.26 0.02 asserted 0.97
s1 Higher-order methods are known to be effective for solving such problems, as they speed up convergence rates. background 1.00 0.04 0.03 asserted 0.91
s2 These methods often require, or implicitly ensure, a monotonic decrease in the objective function across iterations. background 0.98 0.05 0.03 hedged possibility 0.53
s3 Maintaining this monotonicity typically requires that the \( p \)-th derivative of the smooth part of the objective function is globally Lipschitz or that the generated iterates remain bounded. background 0.90 0.06 0.03 asserted 0.80
s4 In this paper, we propose nonmonotone higher-order Taylor approximation (NHOTA) method for composite problems. contribution 0.91 0.92 0.16 asserted 1.00
s5 Our method achieves the same nice global and rate of convergence properties as traditional higher-order methods while eliminating the need for global Lipschitz continuity assumptions, strict descent condition, or explicit boundedness of the iterates. result 0.56 0.93 0.82 asserted 1.00
s6 Specifically, for nonconvex composite problems, we derive global convergence rate to a stationary point of order \( \mathcal{O}(k^{-\frac{p}{p+1}}) \), where \( k \) is the iteration counter. result 1.00 0.96 0.20 asserted 1.00
s7 Moreover, when the objective function satisfies the Kurdyka-{\L}ojasiewicz (KL) property, we obtain improved rates that depend on the KL parameter. result 0.99 0.93 0.08 asserted 1.00
s8 Furthermore, for convex composite problems, our method achieves sublinear convergence rate of order \( \mathcal{O}(k^{-p}) \) in function values. result 1.00 0.94 0.12 asserted 1.00
s9 Finally, preliminary numerical experiments on nonconvex phase retrieval problems highlight the promising performance of the proposed approach. result 0.90 0.95 0.06 asserted 0.56

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

We study composite optimization problems in which the smooth part of the objective function is \( p \)-times continuously differentiable, where \( p \geq 1 \) is an integer. Higher-order methods are known to be effective for solving such problems, as they speed up convergence rates. These methods often require, or implicitly ensure, a monotonic decrease in the objective function across iterations. Maintaining this monotonicity typically requires that the \( p \)-th derivative of the smooth part of the objective function is globally Lipschitz or that the generated iterates remain bounded. In this paper, we propose nonmonotone higher-order Taylor approximation (NHOTA) method for composite problems. Our method achieves the same nice global and rate of convergence properties as traditional higher-order methods while eliminating the need for global Lipschitz continuity assumptions, strict descent condition, or explicit boundedness of the iterates. Specifically, for nonconvex composite problems, we derive global convergence rate to a stationary point of order \( \mathcal{O}(k^{-\frac{p}{p+1}}) \), where \( k \) is the iteration counter. Moreover, when the objective function satisfies the Kurdyka-{\L}ojasiewicz (KL) property, we obtain improved rates that depend on the KL parameter. Furthermore, for convex composite problems, our method achieves sublinear convergence rate of order \( \mathcal{O}(k^{-p}) \) in function values. Finally, preliminary numerical experiments on nonconvex phase retrieval problems highlight the promising performance of the proposed approach.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 7 sentences without a confident label

Builds on 2 papers
Uses the method or tool of 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.