pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.03869 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.str-el

Intervalley-Coupled Twisted Bilayer Graphene from Substrate Commensuration

Bo-Ting Chen , Michael G. Scheer , Biao Lian This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords bandssubstrategraphenecouplingflatlatticebilayercommensurate
0
0 comments X

The pith

Substrate commensuration induces intervalley coupling in TBG, hybridizing flat bands into a p_x-p_y honeycomb model with quadratic touchings that flatten due to frustration and yield topological bands with C up to 4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Twisted bilayer graphene at the magic angle already has flat electron bands from its moire pattern. This work proposes adding a substrate whose lattice matches graphene in a specific ratio of sqrt(3). The match folds the two valleys of graphene together at one momentum point. The resulting hybridization turns the original flat bands into four bands that behave like electrons in p_x and p_y orbitals on a honeycomb lattice. In that effective model, the second conduction and valence bands touch quadratically but can be made flat by geometric frustration. Adding spin-orbit coupling from the substrate opens gaps and gives the bands large topological invariants. The authors point to Sb2Te3 and GeSb2Te4 as materials whose lattice constants nearly match the required ratio. For realistic substrate strengths, the flattest bands still occur near the usual magic angle of 1.05 degrees, and the quantum metric remains close to ideal.

Core claim

The intervalley coupling folds the ±K valleys of TBG to the Γ-point and hybridizes the original TBG flat bands into a four-band model equivalent to the p_x-p_y orbital honeycomb lattice model, in which the second conduction and valence bands have quadratic band touchings and can become flat due to geometric frustration. The spin-orbit coupling from the substrate opens gaps between the bands, yielding topological bands with spin Chern numbers C up to ±4.

Load-bearing premise

The substrate provides a clean, commensurate triangular lattice potential of sufficient strength to induce the intervalley coupling and hybridization while preserving the TBG moire structure and without introducing significant disorder or lattice mismatch effects (abstract, paragraph on substrate alignment and candidate materials).

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.03869 by Biao Lian, Bo-Ting Chen, Michael G. Scheer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a)-(b): Top view of the bottom graphene lattice [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The moiré band structure for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) and (d) show examples of the moiré bands for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that intervalley coupling can be induced in twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) by aligning the bottom graphene layer with either of two types of commensurate insulating triangular Bravais lattice substrate. The intervalley coupling folds the $\pm K$ valleys of TBG to the $\Gamma$-point and hybridizes the original TBG flat bands into a four-band model equivalent to the $p_x$-$p_y$ orbital honeycomb lattice model, in which the second conduction and valence bands have quadratic band touchings and can become flat due to geometric frustration. The spin-orbit coupling from the substrate opens gaps between the bands, yielding topological bands with spin Chern numbers $\mathcal{C}$ up to $\pm 4$. For realistic substrate potential strengths, the minimal bandwidths of the hybridized flat bands are still achieved around the TBG magic angle $\theta_M=1.05^\circ$, and their quantum metrics are nearly ideal. We identify two candidate substrate materials Sb$_2$Te$_3$ and GeSb$_2$Te$_4$, which nearly perfectly realize the commensurate lattice constant ratio of $\sqrt{3}$ with graphene. These systems provide a promising platform for exploring strongly correlated topological states driven by geometric frustration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes that aligning the bottom graphene layer of twisted bilayer graphene (TBG) with a commensurate insulating triangular Bravais lattice substrate induces intervalley coupling. This folds the ±K valleys to the Γ point and hybridizes the original TBG flat bands into a four-band model equivalent to the p_x-p_y orbital honeycomb lattice, where the second conduction and valence bands exhibit quadratic touchings that flatten due to geometric frustration. Substrate spin-orbit coupling opens gaps, producing topological bands with spin Chern numbers up to ±4. The minimal bandwidths remain near the TBG magic angle θ_M=1.05°, with nearly ideal quantum metrics; Sb₂Te₃ and GeSb₂Te₄ are identified as candidate substrates realizing the √3 lattice ratio.

Significance. If the hybridization, flat-band condition, and topological invariants hold under realistic conditions, the work identifies a new substrate-engineered platform for geometrically frustrated flat bands and strongly correlated topological states in TBG, with the persistence of the magic angle and near-ideal quantum metrics as notable features. This extends moiré engineering beyond intrinsic TBG.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and substrate alignment discussion] The central claim of exact valley folding to Γ and equivalence to the p_x-p_y honeycomb model (abstract) rests on the assumption of a clean, uniform triangular substrate potential with perfect √3 commensuration. No quantitative bound on tolerable mismatch, strain, or reconstruction is provided; even small deviations would replace the assumed potential with a longer-period moiré, invalidating the four-band hybridization and quadratic touchings.
  2. [Band structure and effective model section] The assertion that the second conduction/valence bands become flat due to geometric frustration in the effective model, and that minimal bandwidths occur at θ_M=1.05° for realistic substrate strengths, requires explicit diagonalization or mapping of the combined TBG+substrate Hamiltonian to confirm the equivalence and frustration mechanism; the abstract states the result but the load-bearing step is not verified against mismatch effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Candidate materials paragraph] The lattice constants and alignment details for Sb₂Te₃ and GeSb₂Te₄ should include explicit numerical comparison to graphene's a=2.46 Å to quantify the 'nearly perfect' √3 ratio.
  2. [Topological characterization] Notation for spin Chern numbers C should be clarified as to whether they are per spin or total, and how they are computed (e.g., via Berry curvature integration).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which help clarify the assumptions underlying our proposed platform. We provide point-by-point responses below and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and substrate alignment discussion] The central claim of exact valley folding to Γ and equivalence to the p_x-p_y honeycomb model (abstract) rests on the assumption of a clean, uniform triangular substrate potential with perfect √3 commensuration. No quantitative bound on tolerable mismatch, strain, or reconstruction is provided; even small deviations would replace the assumed potential with a longer-period moiré, invalidating the four-band hybridization and quadratic touchings.

    Authors: We acknowledge that our analysis assumes perfect commensuration to derive the exact folding and the effective four-band model. The manuscript identifies candidate substrates (Sb₂Te₃ and GeSb₂Te₄) that nearly achieve the √3 ratio, with lattice mismatches small enough that the primary moiré period remains dominant. However, we agree that a quantitative bound on acceptable mismatch would strengthen the claims. In the revised manuscript, we will add an estimate of the mismatch tolerance based on the relative lattice constants and discuss the perturbative effects of small deviations on the band structure. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Band structure and effective model section] The assertion that the second conduction/valence bands become flat due to geometric frustration in the effective model, and that minimal bandwidths occur at θ_M=1.05° for realistic substrate strengths, requires explicit diagonalization or mapping of the combined TBG+substrate Hamiltonian to confirm the equivalence and frustration mechanism; the abstract states the result but the load-bearing step is not verified against mismatch effects.

    Authors: The effective model equivalence is obtained by constructing the substrate-induced intervalley coupling terms in the continuum TBG Hamiltonian and projecting onto the flat-band subspace, resulting in the p_x-p_y honeycomb model with quadratic touchings. The geometric frustration leading to flattening is demonstrated analytically in the effective model, and numerical diagonalization of the full Hamiltonian confirms the minimal bandwidth at the magic angle for the substrate strengths considered. The verification is performed for the commensurate case, which is the focus of the work. For the identified substrates with near-perfect commensuration, mismatch effects are expected to be weak perturbations that do not alter the qualitative topology or frustration mechanism. We will revise the manuscript to more explicitly reference the sections containing the Hamiltonian mapping and numerical results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation proceeds from explicit Hamiltonian modeling without reduction to inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper constructs an effective four-band model by introducing intervalley coupling via a commensurate substrate potential, then shows folding of TBG valleys to Gamma and hybridization into a p_x-p_y honeycomb lattice. The quadratic touchings, geometric frustration flatness, SOC gaps, and spin Chern numbers up to ±4 follow directly from diagonalizing this model at the magic angle. No equations reduce a claimed result to a fitted parameter defined by the same data, no uniqueness theorem is imported from self-citation, and the equivalence to the known orbital model is presented as a derived outcome rather than an ansatz smuggled in. The commensuration assumption is an external physical premise, not a definitional loop. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that a clean commensurate substrate potential can be realized without disrupting TBG coherence; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The substrate forms an insulating triangular Bravais lattice that aligns commensurately with the bottom graphene layer at lattice-constant ratio sqrt(3).
    Invoked to produce the intervalley coupling and valley folding to Gamma.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5760 in / 1377 out tokens · 37199 ms · 2026-05-23T00:47:58.749603+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Γ-valley

    andµis not divisible by3. Fig. 1(a) shows a type Y configuration with (rs,ϕs) = ( √ 3, 30◦). The distortion induced on the graphene lattice by this substrate config- uration is known as Kekulé-O order [53, 58]. Fig. 1(b) shows a type X configuration with(rs,ϕs) = (3, 0◦). In both cases, the black (pink and green) lattice represents the bottom graphene lay...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Γ- valley

    The parameters are fitted from first prin- ciples band structure of monolayer graphene on monolayer substrate, with their lattice ratio relaxed to exactlyrs = √ 3. Employing Quantum Espresso [71] for first principles calculations, we identify two candidate type Y substrate materials with a lattice constant ratiors≈ √ 3: Sb2Te3 with lattice constantas = 4....

    work page

  3. [3]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Moiré bands in twisted double-layer graphene, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108, 12233 (2011), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1108174108

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1108174108 2011

  4. [4]

    H. C. Po, L. Zou, T. Senthil, and A. Vishwanath, Faithful tight-binding models and fragile topology of magic-angle bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B99, 195455 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    J. Ahn, S. Park, and B.-J. Yang, Failure of nielsen-ninomiya theorem and fragile topology in two- dimensional systems with space-time inversion symme- try: Application to twisted bilayer graphene at magic angle, Phys. Rev. X9, 021013 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Z. Song, Z. Wang, W. Shi, G. Li, C. Fang, and B. A. Bernevig, All magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene are topological, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 036401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Z.-D. Song, B. Lian, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Twisted bilayer graphene. ii. stable symmetry anomaly, Physical Review B 103, 10.1103/physrevb.103.205412 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.205412 2021

  8. [8]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Correlated insulator behaviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Nature 556, 80–84 (2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Unconventionalsuper- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture 556, 43–50 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    Taniguchi, D

    M.Yankowitz, S.Chen, H.Polshyn, Y.Zhang, K.Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Tuning superconductivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 363, 1059–1064 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    G. Chen, L. Jiang, S. Wu, B. Lyu, H. Li, B. L. Chittari, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, J. Jung, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Evidence of a gate-tunable mott insulator in a trilayer graphene moiré superlattice, Nature Physics 15, 237–241 (2019)

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Su- perconductors, orbital magnets and correlated states in magic-angle bilayer graphene, Nature 574, 653–657 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Y. Choi, J. Kemmer, Y. Peng, A. Thomson, H. Arora, R. Polski, Y. Zhang, H. Ren, J. Alicea, G. Refael, F. von Oppen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Nadj-Perge, Electronic correlations in twisted bilayer graphene near the magic angle, Nature Physics15, 1174–1180 (2019)

    work page 2019

  14. [14]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent ferromagnetism near three-quarters filling in twisted bilayer graphene, Science 365, 605–608 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    Taniguchi, C

    H.Polshyn, M.Yankowitz, S.Chen, Y.Zhang, K.Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, C. R. Dean, and A. F. Young, Large linear-in-temperature resistivity in twisted bilayer graphene, Nature Physics15, 1011 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Correlated Insulating and Superconducting States in Twisted Bilayer Graphene Below the Magic Angle

    E. Codecido, Q. Wang, R. Koester, S. Che, H. Tian, R. Lv, S. Tran, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Zhang, M. Bockrath, and C. N. Lau, Correlated insulating and superconducting states in twisted bilayer graphene below themagicangle(2019),arXiv:1902.05151[cond-mat.mes- hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    X. Liu, Z. Hao, E. Khalaf, J. Y. Lee, Y. Ronen, H. Yoo, D.HaeiNajafabadi, K.Watanabe, T.Taniguchi, A.Vish- wanath, and P. Kim, Tunable spin-polarized correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature583, 221–225 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    C. Shen, Y. Chu, Q. Wu, N. Li, S. Wang, Y. Zhao, J. Tang, J. Liu, J. Tian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, R. Yang, Z. Y. Meng, D. Shi, O. V. Yazyev, and G. Zhang, Correlated states in twisted double bilayer graphene, Nature Physics16, 520–525 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, Y.-H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Shi, T. Senthil, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Tunable correlated chern insulator and ferro- magnetisminamoirésuperlattice,Nature 579,56(2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    E. Y. Andrei and A. H. MacDonald, Graphene bilayers with a twist, Nature Materials19, 1265–1275 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Watanabe, T

    M.Serlin, C.L.Tschirhart, H.Polshyn, Y.Zhang, J.Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Intrinsic quantized anomalous hall effect in a moiré het- 6 erostructure, Science 367, 900–903 (2020)

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    K. P. Nuckolls, M. Oh, D. Wong, B. Lian, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Strongly correlated chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 588, 610–615 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Y. Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Kha- laf, P. Ledwith, Y. Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and A. Yacoby, Fractional chern in- sulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene, Nature 600, 439–443 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Lian, Z.-D

    B. Lian, Z.-D. Song, N. Regnault, D. K. Efetov, A. Yaz- dani, and B. A. Bernevig, Twisted bilayer graphene. iv. exact insulator ground states and phase diagram, Physi- cal Review B103, 10.1103/physrevb.103.205414 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.205414 2021

  25. [25]

    Bultinck, E

    N. Bultinck, E. Khalaf, S. Liu, S. Chatterjee, A. Vish- wanath, and M. P. Zaletel, Ground state and hidden symmetry of magic-angle graphene at even integer fill- ing, Physical Review X10, 10.1103/physrevx.10.031034 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.031034 2020

  26. [27]

    K. P. Nuckolls, R. L. Lee, M. Oh, D. Wong, T. Soe- jima, J. P. Hong, D. Călugăru, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, B.A.Bernevig, K.Watanabe, T.Taniguchi, N.Regnault, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Quantum textures of the many-body wavefunctions in magic-angle graphene, Na- ture 620, 525–532 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [28]

    Redekop, C

    E. Redekop, C. Zhang, H. Park, J. Cai, E. Ander- son, O. Sheekey, T. Arp, G. Babikyan, S. Salters, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Xu, and A. F. Young, Direct magnetic imaging of fractional chern insulators in twisted mote2 with a superconducting sensor (2024), arXiv:2405.10269 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [29]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y. Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y. Ran, T. Cao, L. Fu, D. Xiao, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Signatures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2, Nature622, 63–68 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [30]

    Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Knüppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Thermodynamic evidence of fractional Chern insulator in moiré MoTe2, Nature 622, 69 (2023), arXiv:2305.00973 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2023

  30. [31]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J.-H. Chu, T. Cao, L. Fu, W. Yao, C.-Z. Chang, D. Cobden, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Observation of fractionally quantized anomalous hall effect, Nature622, 74–79 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [33]

    Z. Ji, H. Park, M. E. Barber, C. Hu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, and Z.-X. Shen, Lo- cal probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional chern insulator, Nature 635, 578–583 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [34]

    K. Kang, B. Shen, Y. Qiu, Y. Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Shan, and K. Mak, Evidence of the frac- tional quantum spin hall effect in moiré mote2, Nature 628, 522 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [35]

    F. Xu, X. Chang, J. Xiao, Y. Zhang, F. Liu, Z. Sun, N. Mao, N. Peshcherenko, J. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, L. Lu, J. Jia, D. Qian, Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, X. Liu, S. Jiang, and T. Li, Interplay be- tween topology and correlations in the second moiré band of twisted bilayer mote2 (2024), arXiv:2406.09687 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [36]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, W. Li, C. Wang, C. Hu, Y. Zhao, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. Yang, D. Cobden, J.- H. Chu, N. Regnault, B. A. Bernevig, L. Fu, T. Cao, D. Xiao, and X. Xu, Ferromagnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a fractional chern insulator (2024), arXiv:2406.09591 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2024

  35. [37]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y. Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nature 626, 759 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [38]

    G.Tarnopolsky, A.J.Kruchkov,andA.Vishwanath,Ori- gin of magic angles in twisted bilayer graphene, Physi- cal Review Letters122, 10.1103/physrevlett.122.106405 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.106405 2019

  37. [39]

    Millis, Z.Liu, andB.Yang,Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys

    J.Wang, J.Cano, A.J. Millis, Z.Liu, andB.Yang,Exact landau level description of geometry and interaction in a flatband, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 246403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [40]

    Claassen, C

    M. Claassen, C. H. Lee, R. Thomale, X.-L. Qi, and T. P. Devereaux, Position-momentum duality and fractional quantum hall effect in chern insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 236802 (2015)

    work page 2015

  39. [41]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. Törmä, Superfluidity in topologi- cally nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications 6, 10.1038/ncomms9944 (2015)

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms9944 2015

  40. [43]

    E. H. Lieb, Two theorems on the hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1201 (1989)

    work page 1989

  41. [44]

    Mielke, Ferromagnetic ground states for the hubbard modelonlinegraphs,JournalofPhysicsA:Mathematical and General 24, L73 (1991)

    A. Mielke, Ferromagnetic ground states for the hubbard modelonlinegraphs,JournalofPhysicsA:Mathematical and General 24, L73 (1991)

    work page 1991

  42. [45]

    General construction and topological classification of crystalline flat bands, Nature Physics18, 185 (2022)

    work page 2022

  43. [46]

    C. Wu, D. Bergman, L. Balents, and S. Das Sarma, Flat bands and wigner crystallization in the honeycomb opti- cal lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 070401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  44. [47]

    D. L. Bergman, C. Wu, and L. Balents, Band touch- ing from real-space topology in frustrated hopping mod- els, Physical Review B 78, 10.1103/physrevb.78.125104 (2008)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.78.125104 2008

  45. [48]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-liquid ground state of the s = 1/2 kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet, Science 332, 1173–1176 (2011)

    work page 2011

  46. [49]

    J.-X. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, Topological kagome magnets and superconductors, Nature 612, 647–657 (2022)

    work page 2022

  47. [50]

    Tang, J.-W

    E. Tang, J.-W. Mei, and X.-G. Wen, High-temperature fractional quantum hall states, Physical Review Letters 106, 10.1103/physrevlett.106.236802 (2011)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.236802 2011

  48. [51]

    Angeli and A

    M. Angeli and A. H. MacDonald, γvalley tran- sition metal dichalcogenide moiré bands, Proceed- 7 ings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 10.1073/pnas.2021826118 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2021826118 2021

  49. [52]

    L. Xian, M. Claassen, D. Kiese, M. M. Scherer, S. Trebst, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Realization of nearly dis- persionless bands with strong orbital anisotropy from destructive interference in twisted bilayer mos2, Na- ture Communications 12, 10.1038/s41467-021-25922-8 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-25922-8 2021

  50. [53]

    Z. Liu, H. Wang, and J. Wang, Magnetic moiré sur- face states and flat chern bands in topological insulators, Physical Review B 106, 10.1103/physrevb.106.035114 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.106.035114 2022

  51. [54]

    H. Wang, Y. Jiang, Z. Liu, and J. Wang, Moiré engineer- ing and topological flat bands in twisted orbital-active bilayers (2022), arXiv:2209.06524 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [55]

    M. G. Scheer and B. Lian, Twistronics of kekulé graphene: Honeycomb and kagome flat bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 266501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  53. [56]

    M. G. Scheer and B. Lian, Kagome and honeycomb flat bands in moiré graphene, Phys. Rev. B 108, 245136 (2023)

    work page 2023

  54. [57]

    M.G.Scheer, K.Gu,andB.Lian,Magicanglesintwisted bilayer graphene near commensuration: Towards a hy- permagic regime, Phys. Rev. B106, 115418 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [58]

    Sugawara, K

    K. Sugawara, K. Kanetani, T. Sato, and T. Takahashi, Fabrication of li-intercalated bilayer graphene, AIP Advances 1, 022103 (2011), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article- pdf/doi/10.1063/1.3582814/13067244/022103_1_online.pdf

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3582814/13067244/022103_1_online.pdf 2011

  56. [59]

    Kanetani, K

    K. Kanetani, K. Sugawara, T. Sato, R. Shimizu, K. Iwaya, T. Hitosugi, and T. Takahashi, Ca in- tercalated bilayer graphene as a thinnest limit of superconducting c6ca, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences 109, 19610 (2012), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1208889109

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1208889109 2012

  57. [60]

    C. Bao, H. Zhang, T. Zhang, X. Wu, L. Luo, S. Zhou, Q. Li, Y. Hou, W. Yao, L. Liu, P. Yu, J. Li, W. Duan, H. Yao, Y. Wang, and S. Zhou, Experimental evi- dence of chiral symmetry breaking in kekulé-ordered graphene, Physical Review Letters 126, 10.1103/phys- revlett.126.206804 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2021

  58. [61]

    V. V. Cheianov, V. I. Fal’ko, O. Syljuåsen, and B. L. Altshuler, Hidden Kekulé ordering of adatoms on graphene, Solid State Communications149, 1499 (2009), arXiv:0906.5174 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  59. [62]

    A. C. Quet al., Ubiquitous defect-induced density wave instability in monolayer graphene, Sci. Adv.8, abm5180 (2022), arXiv:2204.10999 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2022

  60. [63]

    F. Xie, A. Cowsik, Z.-D. Song, B. Lian, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Twisted bilayer graphene. vi. an ex- act diagonalization study at nonzero integer filling, Phys. Rev. B 103, 205416 (2021)

    work page 2021

  61. [64]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, Z. Zhu, and E. Kaxiras, Exact continuum model for low-energy electronic states of twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review Research 1, 10.1103/physrevresearch.1.013001 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.013001 2019

  62. [65]

    See Supplemental Material for details

    work page

  63. [66]

    J.AnandanandY.Aharonov,Geometryofquantumevo- lution, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 1697 (1990)

    work page 1990

  64. [67]

    D. N. Page, Geometrical description of berry’s phase, Phys. Rev. A36, 3479 (1987)

    work page 1987

  65. [68]

    The Insulating State of Matter: A Geometrical Theory

    R. Resta, The insulating state of matter: a geometri- cal theory, European Physical Journal B79, 121 (2011), arXiv:1012.5776 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  66. [69]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Vor- texability: A unifying criterion for ideal fractional chern insulators, Phys. Rev. B108, 205144 (2023)

    work page 2023

  67. [70]

    Estienne, N

    B. Estienne, N. Regnault, and V. Crépel, Ideal chern bands as landau levels in curved space, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032048 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [71]

    Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys

    R. Roy, Band geometry of fractional topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B90, 165139 (2014)

    work page 2014

  69. [72]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and E. Khalaf, Family of ideal chern flatbands with arbitrary chern number in chi- ral twisted graphene multilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 176404 (2022)

    work page 2022

  70. [73]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

    work page 2009

  71. [74]

    Bian, T.-F

    G. Bian, T.-F. Chung, C. Chen, C. Liu, T.-R. Chang, T. Wu, I. Belopolski, H. Zheng, S.-Y. Xu, D. S. Sanchez, N. Alidoust, J. Pierce, B. Quilliams, P. P. Barletta, S. Lorcy, J. Avila, G. Chang, H. Lin, H.-T. Jeng, M.- C. Asensio, Y. P. Chen, and M. Z. Hasan, Experimen- tal observation of two massless dirac-fermion gases in graphene-topological insulator he...

    work page 2016

  72. [75]

    Cao, R.-X

    W. Cao, R.-X. Zhang, P. Tang, G. Yang, J. Sofo, W. Duan, and C.-X. Liu, Heavy dirac fermions in a graphene/topological insulator hetero-junction, 2D Ma- terials 3, 034006 (2016)

    work page 2016

  73. [76]

    Mounet, M

    N. Mounet, M. Gibertini, P. Schwaller, D. Campi, A. Merkys, A. Marrazzo, T. Sohier, I. E. Castelli, A. Ce- pellotti, G. Pizzi, and N. Marzari, Two-dimensional ma- terials from high-throughput computational exfoliation of experimentally known compounds, Nature Nanotech- nology 13, 246–252 (2018)

    work page 2018

  74. [77]

    Campi, N

    D. Campi, N. Mounet, M. Gibertini, G. Pizzi, and N. Marzari, Expansion of the materials cloud 2d database, ACS Nano17, 11268 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [78]

    Jiang, Y

    Y. Jiang, Y. Wang, M. Chen, Z. Li, C. Song, K. He, L. Wang, X. Chen, X. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Landau quan- tization and the thickness limit of topological insulator thin films ofsb2te3, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 016401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  76. [79]

    Fubini, On a Metric defined by a Hermitian form, Atti Inst

    G. Fubini, On a Metric defined by a Hermitian form, Atti Inst. Veneto Sci. Lett. Arti63, 501 (1904)

    work page 1904

  77. [80]

    J. Yu, B. A. Bernevig, R. Queiroz, E. Rossi, P. Törmä, and B.-J. Yang, Quantum geometry in quantum materi- als (2024), arXiv:2501.00098 [cond-mat.mes-hall]. 1 Supplemental Material I. COMMENSURA TE SUBSTRA TES We consider a system consisting of a graphene monolayer stacked on top of a substrate. In the context of the main text, this graphene monolayer is ...

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [81]

    (S1) impliesν= 0

    Ifϕs = 0, Eq. (S1) impliesν= 0. Defining ¯ρ= ρ/3, the solutions of Eq. (S1) are gcd(µ,¯ρ) = 1, 3 ∤ µ, and rs =eϵ= 3¯ρ µ. Examples ofrs include 3 1, 3 2, 6 1, 6 5, 9 1, 9 2, 9 4, 9 5, 9 7, 9 8,···

    work page

  79. [82]

    symmetry

    If ϕs = π/6, Eq. (S1) implies √ 3ν µ = tan(−ϕs) = −1√ 3, so thatµ=−3ν. The imaginary part of Eq. (S1) becomes eϵ=−ρ 2 √ 3ν. Defining ¯ρ=ρ/3, the solutions of Eq. (S1) are gcd(ν,¯ρ) = 1, 3 ∤ν, andrs =eϵ=− √ 3¯ρ 2ν. Examples ofrs include √ 3, 3 √ 3 2 , 3 √ 3 4 , 2 √ 3, 5 √ 3 2 , 5 √ 3 4 , 5 √ 3 8 , 3 √ 3, 3 √ 3 5 ,···. We now consider the special case in wh...

    work page

  80. [83]

    C3z +Mˆx +T : type-X substrate hx 1 =τzσ0sz hx 2 =τ0σzs0 hx 3 =τ0σz (p×s)z hx 4 =τyσx (p·s) hx 5 =τ+ (p·σ)sz +τ−(p·σ∗)sz hx 6 = (p·τ)σ+sz + (p·τ∗)σ−sz hx 7 =τxσz (p×s∗)z−τyσ0 (p·s∗) (S17)

    work page

Showing first 80 references.