REVIEW 4 cited by
Compositional Translation: A Novel LLM-based Approach for Low-resource Machine Translation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Compositional Translation: A Novel LLM-based Approach for Low-resource Machine Translation
read the original abstract
The ability of generative large language models (LLMs) to perform in-context learning has given rise to a large body of research into how best to prompt models for various natural language processing tasks. Machine Translation (MT) has been shown to benefit from in-context examples, in particular when they are semantically similar to the sentence to translate. In this paper, we propose a new LLM-based translation paradigm, compositional translation, to replace naive few-shot MT with similarity-based demonstrations. An LLM is used to decompose a sentence into simpler phrases, and then to translate each phrase with the help of retrieved demonstrations. Finally, the LLM is prompted to translate the initial sentence with the help of the self-generated phrase-translation pairs. Our intuition is that this approach should improve translation because these shorter phrases should be intrinsically easier to translate and easier to match with relevant examples. This is especially beneficial in low-resource scenarios, and more generally whenever the selection pool is small or out of domain. We show that compositional translation boosts LLM translation performance on a wide range of popular MT benchmarks, including FLORES 200, NTREX 128 and TICO-19. Code and outputs are available at https://github.com/ArmelRandy/compositional-translation
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
When the Gold Standard Isn't Necessarily Standard: Challenges of Evaluating the Translation of User-Generated Content
Analysis of UGC datasets shows varying standardness in reference translations and that LLM translation scores improve when prompts align with dataset-specific guidelines for handling non-standard language.
-
When the Gold Standard Isn't Necessarily Standard: Challenges of Evaluating the Translation of User-Generated Content
Translation guidelines for user-generated content vary widely across datasets, and prompt-aligned guidelines can shift LLM translation scores by several points, so evaluation must account for them.
-
LatentMT: Machine Translation with Latent Reasoning
A 2.6B looped language model with per-pair LoRA adapters matches or beats 8B-14B MT systems on 32 language pairs, with recurrent-step gains saturating after the first few steps.
-
Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation
A literature survey that organizes prompting, fine-tuning, preference optimization, and context-aware techniques for LLM-based machine translation with emphasis on low-resource languages.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.