Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Compositional Translation: A Novel LLM-based Approach for Low-resource Machine Translation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04554 v1 pith:46UBTCI6 submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL

Compositional Translation: A Novel LLM-based Approach for Low-resource Machine Translation

classification cs.CL
keywords translationtranslatecompositionalsentenceapproachdemonstrationseasierexamples
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The ability of generative large language models (LLMs) to perform in-context learning has given rise to a large body of research into how best to prompt models for various natural language processing tasks. Machine Translation (MT) has been shown to benefit from in-context examples, in particular when they are semantically similar to the sentence to translate. In this paper, we propose a new LLM-based translation paradigm, compositional translation, to replace naive few-shot MT with similarity-based demonstrations. An LLM is used to decompose a sentence into simpler phrases, and then to translate each phrase with the help of retrieved demonstrations. Finally, the LLM is prompted to translate the initial sentence with the help of the self-generated phrase-translation pairs. Our intuition is that this approach should improve translation because these shorter phrases should be intrinsically easier to translate and easier to match with relevant examples. This is especially beneficial in low-resource scenarios, and more generally whenever the selection pool is small or out of domain. We show that compositional translation boosts LLM translation performance on a wide range of popular MT benchmarks, including FLORES 200, NTREX 128 and TICO-19. Code and outputs are available at https://github.com/ArmelRandy/compositional-translation

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When the Gold Standard Isn't Necessarily Standard: Challenges of Evaluating the Translation of User-Generated Content

    cs.CL 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Analysis of UGC datasets shows varying standardness in reference translations and that LLM translation scores improve when prompts align with dataset-specific guidelines for handling non-standard language.

  2. When the Gold Standard Isn't Necessarily Standard: Challenges of Evaluating the Translation of User-Generated Content

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0

    Translation guidelines for user-generated content vary widely across datasets, and prompt-aligned guidelines can shift LLM translation scores by several points, so evaluation must account for them.

  3. LatentMT: Machine Translation with Latent Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A 2.6B looped language model with per-pair LoRA adapters matches or beats 8B-14B MT systems on 32 language pairs, with recurrent-step gains saturating after the first few steps.

  4. Bridging the Linguistic Divide: A Survey on Leveraging Large Language Models for Machine Translation

    cs.CL 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    A literature survey that organizes prompting, fine-tuning, preference optimization, and context-aware techniques for LLM-based machine translation with emphasis on low-resource languages.