Pith. sign in

REVIEW 10 cited by

START: Self-taught Reasoner with Tools

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04625 v2 pith:62TAP2JZ submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningstarthint-infertoolsmodelachievescapabilitiescode
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large reasoning models (LRMs) like OpenAI-o1 and DeepSeek-R1 have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks through the utilization of long Chain-of-thought (CoT). However, these models often suffer from hallucinations and inefficiencies due to their reliance solely on internal reasoning processes. In this paper, we introduce START (Self-Taught Reasoner with Tools), a novel tool-integrated long CoT reasoning LLM that significantly enhances reasoning capabilities by leveraging external tools. Through code execution, START is capable of performing complex computations, self-checking, exploring diverse methods, and self-debugging, thereby addressing the limitations of LRMs. The core innovation of START lies in its self-learning framework, which comprises two key techniques: 1) Hint-infer: We demonstrate that inserting artificially designed hints (e.g., ``Wait, maybe using Python here is a good idea.'') during the inference process of a LRM effectively stimulates its ability to utilize external tools without the need for any demonstration data. Hint-infer can also serve as a simple and effective sequential test-time scaling method; 2) Hint Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning (Hint-RFT): Hint-RFT combines Hint-infer and RFT by scoring, filtering, and modifying the reasoning trajectories with tool invocation generated by a LRM via Hint-infer, followed by fine-tuning the LRM. Through this framework, we have fine-tuned the QwQ-32B model to achieve START. On PhD-level science QA (GPQA), competition-level math benchmarks (AMC23, AIME24, AIME25), and the competition-level code benchmark (LiveCodeBench), START achieves accuracy rates of 63.6%, 95.0%, 66.7%, 47.1%, and 47.3%, respectively. It significantly outperforms the base QwQ-32B and achieves performance comparable to the state-of-the-art open-weight model R1-Distill-Qwen-32B and the proprietary model o1-Preview.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 10 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Toward Skill-Native LLMs: Skill Entropy for Benchmarking and Training Long-Horizon Reasoning

    cs.CL 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Skill entropy, a reference-model-based measure of skill-switching difficulty, calibrates a new cross-skill benchmark and serves as an RL reward, more than doubling small models' scores.

  2. PEARL: Solver-in-the-Loop Interactive Optimization Modeling from Natural Language

    cs.AI 2026-05 reject novelty 7.0 of 10

    Training an LLM as a multi-turn agent that runs and repairs solver code raises verified optimization solve rates, with the 4B PEARL model outperforming DeepSeek-V3.2-685B in aggregate.

  3. Gecko: A Simulation Environment with Stateful Feedback for Refining Agent Tool Calls

    cs.SE 2026-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulated tool environment with argument validation, response synthesis, and task-state feedback improves LLM tool-call accuracy at test time.

  4. Does More Inference-Time Compute Really Help Robustness?

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    With exposed reasoning chains, increasing inference-time compute consistently decreases measured robustness across 12 open-source reasoning models, while hidden chains show improvements.

  5. Logical Reasoning with Outcome Reward Models for Test-Time Scaling

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Outcome reward models trained on multi-sample chain-of-thought plus deliberately flawed 'echo' rationales improve Best-of-N test-time verification for deductive reasoning.

  6. Thinking Before You Speak: A Proactive Test-time Scaling Approach

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    TBYS inserts generated situation-and-goal insights between reasoning steps and reports math accuracy gains, but the insight library is filtered using test-set answers.

  7. The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A literature survey that introduces a taxonomy for LLM reasoning paradigms, analyzes methodological trends, and synthesizes failure modes from over 300 papers.

  8. Empowering Nanoscale Connectivity through Molecular Communication: A Case Study of Virus Infection

    cs.NI 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper proposing molecular communication as the link layer for epidemic-control bio-nano networks, with an ORF3a-based mutation identification simulation; the provided manuscript body does not match this abstract.

  9. Infinite Video Understanding

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    The paper argues that video understanding research should aim at processing streams of arbitrary, unbounded duration and outlines the challenges, directions, and metrics needed.

  10. From System 1 to System 2: A Survey of Reasoning Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2025-02 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    The survey organizes the shift of LLMs toward deliberate System 2 reasoning, covering model construction techniques, performance on math and coding benchmarks, and future research directions.

Pith tools