Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Adversarial Example Based Fingerprinting for Robust Copyright Protection in Split Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04825 v1 pith:ESGRJ325 submitted 2025-03-05 cs.CR

Adversarial Example Based Fingerprinting for Robust Copyright Protection in Split Learning

classification cs.CR
keywords modellearningcopyrightdatafingerprintprotectionsplitadversarial
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Currently, deep learning models are easily exposed to data leakage risks. As a distributed model, Split Learning thus emerged as a solution to address this issue. The model is splitted to avoid data uploading to the server and reduce computing requirements while ensuring data privacy and security. However, the transmission of data between clients and server creates a potential vulnerability. In particular, model is vulnerable to intellectual property (IP) infringement such as piracy. Alarmingly, a dedicated copyright protection framework tailored for Split Learning models is still lacking. To this end, we propose the first copyright protection scheme for Split Learning model, leveraging fingerprint to ensure effective and robust copyright protection. The proposed method first generates a set of specifically designed adversarial examples. Then, we select those examples that would induce misclassifications to form the fingerprint set. These adversarial examples are embedded as fingerprints into the model during the training process. Exhaustive experiments highlight the effectiveness of the scheme. This is demonstrated by a remarkable fingerprint verification success rate (FVSR) of 100% on MNIST, 98% on CIFAR-10, and 100% on ImageNet, respectively. Meanwhile, the model's accuracy only decreases slightly, indicating that the embedded fingerprints do not compromise model performance. Even under label inference attack, our approach consistently achieves a high fingerprint verification success rate that ensures robust verification.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.