Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Are Large Language Models Good In-context Learners for Financial Sentiment Analysis?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.04873 v1 pith:6RU4BPJQ submitted 2025-03-06 cs.CL cs.AIq-fin.CP

classification cs.CLcs.AIq-fin.CP
keywords in-contextfinancialllmsmodelsanalysissentimentchallengesdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recently, large language models (LLMs) with hundreds of billions of parameters have demonstrated the emergent ability, surpassing traditional methods in various domains even without fine-tuning over domain-specific data. However, when it comes to financial sentiment analysis (FSA)$\unicode{x2013}$a fundamental task in financial AI$\unicode{x2013}$these models often encounter various challenges, such as complex financial terminology, subjective human emotions, and ambiguous inclination expressions. In this paper, we aim to answer the fundamental question: whether LLMs are good in-context learners for FSA? Unveiling this question can yield informative insights on whether LLMs can learn to address the challenges by generalizing in-context demonstrations of financial document-sentiment pairs to the sentiment analysis of new documents, given that finetuning these models on finance-specific data is difficult, if not impossible at all. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper exploring in-context learning for FSA that covers most modern LLMs (recently released DeepSeek V3 included) and multiple in-context sample selection methods. Comprehensive experiments validate the in-context learning capability of LLMs for FSA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MAPLE: Many-Shot Adaptive Pseudo-Labeling for In-Context Learning

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MAPLE uses graph-influence scores to select and pseudo-label the most useful unlabeled examples, then adaptively chooses demonstrations per query, improving many-shot in-context learning with few human labels.

Pith tools