pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.05463 · v2 · pith:P45DMKNZnew · submitted 2025-03-07 · ✦ hep-ex

Search for Higgs boson exotic decays into Lorentz-boosted light bosons in the four-τ final state at sqrt{s}=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 01:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ex
keywords Higgs bosonexotic decaylight bosontau leptonfour-tau final stateATLAS detectorboosted reconstructionupper limits
0
0 comments X

The pith

No significant excess is observed in search for Higgs exotic decays to four taus.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a search for the Higgs boson decaying into a pair of light scalars a that each decay to tau lepton pairs, H to aa to 4 tau. It uses 140 fb inverse of 13 TeV data from ATLAS, focusing on the mass range 4 to 15 GeV where the a to tau tau is boosted. A muon removal technique is employed for reconstruction of the di-tau pairs. No significant excess above background is seen. This leads to upper limits on the signal strength times branching fraction from 0.03 to 0.10 at 95 percent confidence level.

Core claim

No significant excess above the Standard Model background prediction is observed. Upper limits on (σ(H)/σ_SM(H))×B(H→aa→4τ) at 95% confidence level are provided, ranging from 0.03 to 0.10 depending on the a-boson mass.

What carries the argument

Lorentz-boosted di-tau reconstruction with dedicated muon removal technique for mixed hadronic-muonic tau decays.

If this is right

  • Limits constrain the branching ratio of the exotic decay to below 10 percent in the given mass range.
  • The results test models where light a-bosons have Yukawa-like couplings to taus.
  • The search covers the mass range above twice the tau mass but below twice the b mass.
  • Data from the full Run 2 dataset is used to set these limits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • With increased luminosity in future LHC runs, these limits could be improved to further constrain extended Higgs models.
  • The technique for handling boosted tau pairs could be adapted for other searches involving light particles decaying to taus.
  • This result adds to the constraints on the existence of additional light scalar states beyond the Standard Model Higgs.

Load-bearing premise

The accuracy of the Standard Model background prediction and the modeling of the signal efficiency for the boosted di-tau reconstruction with muon removal.

What would settle it

Observing a significant excess over the predicted background in the four-tau signal regions would indicate the exotic decay process.

read the original abstract

A search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson into a pair of low-mass scalars that subsequently decay into $\tau$-leptons, $H\rightarrow aa\rightarrow \tau^+\tau^-\tau^+\tau^-$, is presented. In models with Yukawa-like couplings, the decay to $\tau$-leptons is favoured for light $a$-bosons, with mass in the range of $2m_{\tau} < m_a < 2m_{b}$. Results are presented in the range of $4 \, \mathrm{GeV} < m_a < 15 \, \mathrm{GeV} $ using the $140\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider. This search focuses on the scenario where, for both di-$\tau$ pairs, one of the $\tau$-leptons decays to hadrons and neutrinos, while the other decays to a muon and neutrinos. In this mass range, the $a\rightarrow \tau^+\tau^-$ is Lorentz-boosted and a dedicated muon removal technique is used to reconstruct the di-$\tau$ pairs. No significant excess above the Standard Model background prediction is observed. Upper limits on $(\sigma(H)/\sigma_{\mathrm{SM}}(H))\times \mathcal{B}(H\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\tau)$ at $95\%$ confidence level are provided, ranging from $0.03$ to $0.10$ depending on the $a$-boson mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a search for exotic Higgs boson decays H → aa → τ⁺τ⁻τ⁺τ⁻ with 4 < m_a < 15 GeV using 140 fb⁻¹ of 13 TeV ATLAS Run 2 data. The analysis targets the boosted regime where each a → τ⁺τ⁻ pair has one hadronic and one muonic τ decay, employing a dedicated muon removal technique for di-τ reconstruction. No significant excess above the SM background prediction is observed, and 95% CL upper limits on (σ(H)/σ_SM(H)) × B(H → aa → 4τ) are reported in the range 0.03–0.10 depending on m_a.

Significance. If the background estimation, systematic uncertainties, and signal efficiency modeling (including the muon removal technique) hold as validated in the full analysis, the result provides competitive constraints on light scalar models with Yukawa-like couplings in a mass range where τ decays are favored. The boosted topology and dedicated reconstruction extend coverage beyond previous searches and deliver falsifiable upper limits on the exotic branching fraction.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the limits range from 0.03 to 0.10 but does not specify the statistical method (e.g., CL_s or asymptotic) or whether the limits are observed or expected; adding this would improve clarity without altering the result.
  2. Figure captions and text should explicitly state the integrated luminosity used for each data-taking period and confirm that the muon removal efficiency is derived from simulation validated in control regions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review of the manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental search with data-driven limits

full rationale

This is a pure experimental search paper reporting observed data compared against Standard Model background predictions from simulation and control regions. The central result (no excess, 95% CL limits 0.03–0.10) follows directly from the measured event yields, efficiency corrections, and statistical procedure; none of the enumerated circularity patterns apply because there is no derivation, ansatz, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain that reduces the output to the input by construction. The analysis is self-contained against external data and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or prior author results as load-bearing premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The result rests on standard assumptions of particle physics experiments regarding background modeling and detector response; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Model background predictions accurately describe the observed data in the signal region after all selections.
    Invoked to interpret the lack of excess as a null result and to derive the upper limits.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5836 in / 1285 out tokens · 48474 ms · 2026-05-23T01:05:40.375336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from Higgs boson decays using the 4$\tau$ and 2$\mu$2$\tau$ final states in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV

    hep-ex 2025-08 accept novelty 4.0

    No excess observed in search for Higgs to a1 a1 decays; 95% CL upper limits on branching ratio range 0.007-0.079 for a1 masses 4-15 GeV, excluding >16% in Type III 2HD+S for tan beta >2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 39 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1, arXiv: 1207.7214 [hep-ex]

  2. [2]

    CMS Collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716 (2012) 30, arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

  3. [3]

    Evans and P

    L. Evans and P. Bryant,LHC Machine, JINST3 (2008) S08001

  4. [4]

    ATLAS Collaboration, A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607 (2022) 52, arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature612 (2022) E24

  5. [5]

    CMS Collaboration, A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607 (2022) 60, arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex], Erratum: Nature623 (2023) E4

  6. [6]

    Exotic Decays of the 125 GeV Higgs Boson

    D. Curtin, R. Essig, S. Gori, P. Jaiswal, A. Katz et al.,Exotic decays of the 125 GeV Higgs boson, Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 075004, arXiv:1312.4992 [hep-ph]

  7. [7]

    Cepeda, S

    M. Cepeda, S. Gori, V. Martinez Outschoorn and J. Shelton,Exotic Higgs Decays, (2021), arXiv: 2111.12751 [hep-ph]

  8. [8]

    M. J. Strassler and K. M. Zurek,Echoes of a hidden valley at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B651 (2007) 374, arXiv:hep-ph/0604261

  9. [9]

    R. M. Schabinger and J. D. Wells,A Minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D72 (2005) 093007, arXiv: hep-ph/0509209

  10. [10]

    Higgs-field Portal into Hidden Sectors

    B. Patt and F. Wilczek,Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0605188

  11. [11]

    Silveira and A

    V. Silveira and A. Zee,Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. B161 (1985) 136

  12. [12]

    Pospelov, A

    M. Pospelov, A. Ritz and M. Voloshin,Secluded WIMP dark matter, Physics Letters B662 (2008) 53,issn: 0370-2693, url: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269308002402

  13. [13]

    Dark Light Higgs

    P. Draper, T. Liu, C. E. M. Wagner, L.-T. Wang and H. Zhang,Dark Light-Higgs Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.106 (2011) 121805, arXiv:1009.3963 [hep-ph]

  14. [14]

    Carena, Y.-Y

    M. Carena, Y.-Y. Li, T. Ou and Y. Wang, Anatomy of the electroweak phase transition for dark sector induced baryogenesis, JHEP 02(2023) 139, arXiv:2210.14352 [hep-ph]

  15. [15]

    Kozaczuk, M

    J. Kozaczuk, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf and J. Shelton, Exotic Higgs boson decays and the electroweak phase transition, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020) 115035, arXiv: 1911.10210 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC

    N. Craig, A. Katz, M. Strassler and R. Sundrum,Naturalness in the Dark at the LHC, JHEP07(2015) 105, arXiv:1501.05310 [hep-ph]

  17. [17]

    Discovering Uncolored Naturalness in Exotic Higgs Decays

    D. Curtin and C. B. Verhaaren,Discovering Uncolored Naturalness in Exotic Higgs Decays, JHEP12(2015) 072, arXiv:1506.06141 [hep-ph]. 15

  18. [18]

    B. A. Dobrescu and K. T. Matchev, Light axion within the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, JHEP09(2000) 031, arXiv: hep-ph/0008192

  19. [19]

    Towards a No-Lose Theorem for NMSSM Higgs Discovery at the LHC

    U. Ellwanger, J. F. Gunion, C. Hugonie and S. Moretti, Towards a No-lose Theorem for NMSSM Higgs Discovery at the LHC, (2003), arXiv: hep-ph/0305109

  20. [20]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for light pseudoscalar boson pairs produced from decays of the125GeV Higgs boson in final states with two muons and two nearby tracks in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Lett. B800 (2020) 135087, arXiv:1907.07235 [hep-ex]

  21. [21]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Higgs bosons decaying to𝑎𝑎 in the𝜇𝜇𝜏𝜏 final state in𝑝 𝑝 collisions at√𝑠 = 8TeV with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 052002, arXiv: 1505.01609 [hep-ex]

  22. [22]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Improved reconstruction of highly boosted𝜏-lepton pairs in the 𝜏𝜏 → ( 𝜇𝜈 𝜇𝜈𝜏) (hadrons + 𝜈𝜏) decay channels with the ATLAS detector, (2024), arXiv: 2412.14937 [hep-ex]

  23. [23]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for a light pseudoscalar Higgs boson in the boosted𝜇𝜇𝜏𝜏 final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP08(2020) 139, arXiv:2005.08694 [hep-ex]

  24. [24]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Higgs bosons decaying into new spin-0 or spin-1 particles in four-lepton final states with the ATLAS detector with139fb−1 of 𝑝 𝑝collision data at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP03(2022) 041, arXiv:2110.13673 [hep-ex]

  25. [25]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for low-mass dilepton resonances in Higgs boson decays to four-lepton final states in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 290, arXiv: 2111.01299 [hep-ex]

  26. [26]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for decays of the Higgs boson into a pair of pseudoscalar particles decaying into𝑏 ¯𝑏𝜏 +𝜏− using 𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 052013, arXiv:2407.01335 [hep-ex]

  27. [27]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for exotic decays of the Higgs boson to a pair of pseudoscalars in the 𝜇𝜇𝑏𝑏 and 𝜏𝜏𝑏𝑏 final states, Eur. Phys. J. C84(2024) 493, arXiv:2402.13358 [hep-ex]

  28. [28]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for Higgs boson decays into a pair of pseudoscalar particles in the 𝑏𝑏𝜇𝜇 final state with the ATLAS detector in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 012006, arXiv:2110.00313 [hep-ex]

  29. [29]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for an exotic decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalars in the final state with two muons and two b quarks in𝑝 𝑝collisions at13TeV, Phys. Lett. B795 (2019) 398, arXiv:1812.06359 [hep-ex]

  30. [30]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson decays into two new low-mass spin-0 particles in the 4𝑏 channel with the ATLAS detector using𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Rev. D102 (2020) 112006, arXiv:2005.12236 [hep-ex]

  31. [31]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for the decay of the Higgs boson to a pair of light pseudoscalar bosons in the final state with four bottom quarks in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP06(2024) 097, arXiv:2403.10341 [hep-ex]. 16

  32. [32]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Search for short- and long-lived axion-like particles in𝐻 → 𝑎𝑎 → 4𝛾 decays with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 742, arXiv: 2312.03306 [hep-ex]

  33. [33]

    CMS Collaboration,Search for exotic Higgs boson decays𝐻 → AA → 4𝛾 with events containing two merged diphotons in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 101801, arXiv:2209.06197 [hep-ex]

  34. [34]

    CMS Collaboration, Search for the exotic decay of the Higgs boson into two light pseudoscalars with four photons in the final state in proton–proton collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, JHEP07 (2023) 148, arXiv: 2208.01469 [hep-ex]

  35. [35]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Search for Higgs boson decays into pairs of light (pseudo)scalar particles in the 𝛾𝛾 𝑗 𝑗 final state in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Lett. B782 (2018) 750, arXiv:1803.11145 [hep-ex]

  36. [36]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider, JINST3 (2008) S08003

  37. [37]

    Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

    G. Avoni et al.,The new LUCID-2 detector for luminosity measurement and monitoring in ATLAS, JINST13 (2018) P07017

  38. [38]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS trigger system in 2015, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 317, arXiv:1611.09661 [hep-ex]

  39. [39]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Software and computing for Run 3 of the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, (2024), arXiv:2404.06335 [hep-ex]

  40. [40]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Luminosity determination in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV using the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 982, arXiv:2212.09379 [hep-ex]

  41. [41]

    ATLAS Collaboration,ATLAS data quality operations and performance for 2015–2018 data-taking, JINST15 (2020) P04003, arXiv:1911.04632 [physics.ins-det]

  42. [42]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Performance of the ATLAS muon triggers in Run 2, JINST15 (2020) P09015, arXiv:2004.13447 [physics.ins-det]

  43. [43]

    NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, E. Re and G. Zanderighi,NNLOPS simulation of Higgs boson production, JHEP10(2013) 222, arXiv:1309.0017 [hep-ph]

  44. [44]

    Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi, Finite quark-mass effects in the NNLOPS POWHEG+MiNLO Higgs generator, JHEP05(2015) 140, arXiv: 1501.04637 [hep-ph]

  45. [45]

    A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX

    S. Alioli, P. Nason, C. Oleari and E. Re,A general framework for implementing NLO calculations in shower Monte Carlo programs: the POWHEG BOX, JHEP06 (2010) 043, arXiv: 1002.2581 [hep-ph]

  46. [46]

    A New Method for Combining NLO QCD with Shower Monte Carlo Algorithms

    P. Nason, A new method for combining NLO QCD with shower Monte Carlo algorithms, JHEP11(2004) 040, arXiv:hep-ph/0409146

  47. [47]

    Matching NLO QCD computations with Parton Shower simulations: the POWHEG method

    S. Frixione, P. Nason and C. Oleari, Matching NLO QCD computations with parton shower simulations: the POWHEG method, JHEP11(2007) 070, arXiv:0709.2092 [hep-ph]

  48. [48]

    PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II

    J. Butterworth et al.,PDF4LHC recommendations for LHC Run II, J. Phys. G43(2016) 023001, arXiv: 1510.03865 [hep-ph]. 17

  49. [49]

    MINLO: Multi-scale improved NLO

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason and G. Zanderighi,MINLO: multi-scale improved NLO, JHEP10(2012) 155, arXiv:1206.3572 [hep-ph]

  50. [50]

    Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching

    K. Hamilton, P. Nason, C. Oleari and G. Zanderighi,Merging H/W/Z + 0 and 1 jet at NLO with no merging scale: a path to parton shower + NNLO matching, JHEP05(2013) 082, arXiv: 1212.4504 [hep-ph]

  51. [51]

    Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC

    G. Bozzi, S. Catani, D. de Florian and M. Grazzini, Transverse-momentum resummation and the spectrum of the Higgs boson at the LHC, Nucl. Phys. B737 (2006) 73, arXiv:hep-ph/0508068 [hep-ph]

  52. [52]

    An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2

    T. Sjöstrand et al.,An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191 (2015) 159, arXiv: 1410.3012 [hep-ph]

  53. [53]

    7 (2019) 034 [1905.09127]

    E. Bothmann et al.,Event generation with Sherpa 2.2, SciPost Phys.7 (2019) 034, arXiv: 1905.09127 [hep-ph]

  54. [54]

    A parton shower algorithm based on Catani-Seymour dipole factorisation

    S. Schumann and F. Krauss, A parton shower algorithm based on Catani–Seymour dipole factorisation, JHEP03 (2008) 038, arXiv: 0709.1027 [hep-ph]

  55. [55]

    QCD matrix elements + parton showers: The NLO case

    S. Höche, F. Krauss, M. Schönherr and F. Siegert, QCD matrix elements + parton showers. The NLO case, JHEP04 (2013) 027, arXiv: 1207.5030 [hep-ph]

  56. [56]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the𝑍/𝛾∗ boson transverse momentum distribution in𝑝 𝑝 collisions at√𝑠 = 7TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP09(2014) 145, arXiv: 1406.3660 [hep-ex]

  57. [57]

    New parton distributions for collider physics

    H.-L. Lai et al.,New parton distributions for collider physics, Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 074024, arXiv: 1007.2241 [hep-ph]

  58. [58]

    Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl

    S. Agostinelli et al.,Geant4 – a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A506 (2003) 250

  59. [59]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure, Eur. Phys. J. C70(2010) 823, arXiv: 1005.4568 [physics.ins-det]

  60. [60]

    A Brief Introduction to PYTHIA 8.1

    T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P. Skands,A brief introduction to PYTHIA 8.1, Comput. Phys. Commun.178 (2008) 852, arXiv:0710.3820 [hep-ph]

  61. [61]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al.,Parton distributions with LHC data, Nucl. Phys. B867 (2013) 244, arXiv:1207.1303 [hep-ph]

  62. [62]

    ATLAS Collaboration, The Pythia 8 A3 tune description of ATLAS minimum bias and inelastic measurements incorporating the Donnachie–Landshoff diffractive model, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2016-017, 2016,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2206965

  63. [63]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Muon reconstruction and identification efficiency in ATLAS using the full Run 2𝑝 𝑝collision data set at√𝑠 = 13TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 578, arXiv: 2012.00578 [hep-ex]

  64. [64]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Electron and photon performance measurements with the ATLAS detector using the 2015–2017 LHC proton–proton collision data, JINST14(2019) P12006, arXiv: 1908.00005 [hep-ex]

  65. [65]

    The anti-k_t jet clustering algorithm

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,The anti-𝑘𝑡 jet clustering algorithm, JHEP04(2008) 063, arXiv: 0802.1189 [hep-ph]. 18

  66. [66]

    FastJet user manual

    M. Cacciari, G. P. Salam and G. Soyez,FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C72 (2012) 1896, arXiv: 1111.6097 [hep-ph]

  67. [67]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Topological cell clustering in the ATLAS calorimeters and its performance in LHC Run 1, Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 490, arXiv:1603.02934 [hep-ex]

  68. [68]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Identification of hadronic tau lepton decays using neural networks in the ATLAS experiment, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2019-033, 2019,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2688062

  69. [69]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Reconstruction, Energy Calibration, and Identification of Hadronically Decaying Tau Leptons in the ATLAS Experiment for Run-2 of the LHC, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2015-045, 2015, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2064383

  70. [70]

    ATLAS Collaboration,Measurements of Higgs boson production cross-sections in the𝐻 → 𝜏+𝜏− decay channel in𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP08(2022) 175, arXiv: 2201.08269 [hep-ex]

  71. [71]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Estimation of backgrounds from jets misidentified as𝜏-leptons using the Universal Fake Factor method with the ATLAS detector, (2025), arXiv:2502.04156 [hep-ex]

  72. [72]

    ATLAS Collaboration, Measurement of the tau lepton reconstruction and identification performance in the ATLAS experiment using𝑝 𝑝collisions at√𝑠 = 13TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2017-029, 2017,url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2261772

  73. [73]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C71 (2011) 1554, arXiv: 1007.1727 [physics.data-an], Erratum: Eur. Phys. J. C73(2013) 2501

  74. [74]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector

    D. de Florian et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector, (2017), arXiv: 1610.07922 [hep-ph]

  75. [75]

    A. L. Read,Presentation of search results: the𝐶 𝐿𝑆 technique, J. Phys. G28 (2002) 2693

  76. [76]

    Haisch, J

    U. Haisch, J. F. Kamenik, A. Malinauskas and M. Spira,Collider constraints on light pseudoscalars, JHEP03(2018) 178, arXiv:1802.02156 [hep-ph]

  77. [77]

    Demokritos

    ATLAS Collaboration, ATLAS Computing Acknowledgements, ATL-SOFT-PUB-2025-001, 2025, url: https://cds.cern.ch/record/2922210. 19 The ATLAS Collaboration G. Aad 104, E. Aakvaag 17, B. Abbott 123, S. Abdelhameed 119a, K. Abeling 55, N.J. Abicht 49, S.H. Abidi 30, M. Aboelela 45, A. Aboulhorma 36e, H. Abramowicz 157, Y. Abulaiti 120, B.S. Acharya 69a,69b,n, A...