REVIEW 1 cited by
Empowering Edge Intelligence: A Comprehensive Survey on On-Device AI Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has led to an increasing deployment of AI models on edge and terminal devices, driven by the proliferation of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the need for real-time data processing. This survey comprehensively explores the current state, technical challenges, and future trends of on-device AI models. We define on-device AI models as those designed to perform local data processing and inference, emphasizing their characteristics such as real-time performance, resource constraints, and enhanced data privacy. The survey is structured around key themes, including the fundamental concepts of AI models, application scenarios across various domains, and the technical challenges faced in edge environments. We also discuss optimization and implementation strategies, such as data preprocessing, model compression, and hardware acceleration, which are essential for effective deployment. Furthermore, we examine the impact of emerging technologies, including edge computing and foundation models, on the evolution of on-device AI models. By providing a structured overview of the challenges, solutions, and future directions, this survey aims to facilitate further research and application of on-device AI, ultimately contributing to the advancement of intelligent systems in everyday life.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
AI for Regulatory Affairs: Balancing Accuracy, Interpretability, and Computational Cost in Medical Device Classification
CNN (88.3% accuracy) and XGBoost (86%) beat zero-shot LLMs (about 46%) on NMPA medical device classification, with no single model winning on accuracy, interpretability, and cost simultaneously.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.