pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.06301 · v2 · submitted 2025-03-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · quant-ph

Driven Magnon-Photon System as a Tunable Quantum Heat Rectifier

C. O. Edet , K. S{\l}owik , N. Ali , M. Asjad , O. Abah This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall quant-ph
keywords quantum heat transportthermal rectificationmagnon-photon hybridopen quantum systemsdriven quantum systemsheat currentssteady-state transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

External driving of the magnonic subsystem enables tuning of quantum heat rectification across its full physical range in a hybrid magnon-photon system.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies quantum heat transport in a hybrid magnon-photon system placed between two thermal baths at unequal temperatures. It establishes that driving the magnonic component externally serves as a control parameter that shapes both the size and the directionality of the steady-state heat currents. Strong thermal rectification appears specifically when the magnon-photon hybridization is weak while the magnon drive is intense. In that regime the drive adjusts the rectification parameter over its entire accessible interval.

Core claim

We demonstrate that external driving of the magnonic subsystem provides a versatile control knob for tailoring steady-state heat currents and their asymmetry. Strong rectification emerges in the regime of weak magnon-photon hybridization combined with intense magnon driving, allowing the rectification parameter to be tuned across its entire physically accessible range.

What carries the argument

The asymmetrically driven hybrid magnon-photon system coupled to two thermal baths, treated with open-quantum-system master equations to obtain the steady-state heat currents and rectification coefficient.

If this is right

  • Both magnitude and direction of the heat current become adjustable by changing only the external magnon drive strength and frequency.
  • The rectification coefficient can be set to any value within its physical bounds by tuning the drive parameters.
  • Heat flow can be made to favor one bath over the other without altering the bath temperatures themselves.
  • The same driving approach can switch the device between rectifier and non-rectifier behavior on demand.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar driving control may apply to other magnon-based or spin-wave hybrids for engineering thermal diodes in solid-state devices.
  • The identified regime could be combined with frequency tuning to create active heat-routing elements inside quantum processors.
  • Testing the predicted tunability would require verifying that strong driving does not introduce unmodeled magnon nonlinearities that saturate the rectification.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid system remains accurately described by standard master-equation methods even when the magnon is driven strongly while hybridized only weakly with the photon mode, without extra decoherence or nonlinear effects invalidating the dynamics.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures the rectification parameter in the weak-hybridization, strong-driving regime and finds values confined well away from the theoretical extremes of plus or minus one.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.06301 by C. O. Edet, K. S{\l}owik, M. Asjad, N. Ali, O. Abah.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Heat rectification architecture of a driven hybrid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Steady-state magnon heat current Jm as a function of reservoir temperature T[K] for different detuning ∆, driv￾ing field strength Ωd, and coupling strength gmc. (a) Magnon heat current Jm as a function of Tm = T for different de￾tuning; ∆ = 0.05γ (red dashed line), ∆ = 0.5γ (blue dotted line), and ∆ = γ (black solid line) with Ωd = 0, Tc = 0.1 and gmc = 0.05γ. (b) Same as (a), but with the driving strength… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Steady-state magnon heat current (forward bias) dependence on the hybrid system parameters and magnon heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Rectification coefficient R as a function of magnon-photon coupling gmc and detuning ∆ with driving amplitude Ωd = 0.5γ. (b) Rectification coefficient R as a function of the strength of the magnon driving Ωd and detuning ∆ with gmc = 0.05γ. (c) R as a function of the strength of the magnon driving Ωd and magnon heat bath temperature Tm = T with gmc = 0.05γ, ∆= 0.5γ, and Tc = 0.1. In (a) and (b), the te… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison between the Rectification R (red curve) and max{J f m,J r m}/γ∆ against magnon bath temper￾ature Tm ≡ T. The parameters used are: gmc = 0.05γ, Ωd = 0.5γ, ∆ = 0.5γ, Tc = 0.1 and γ = 1. The magnetic components of the microwave field are per￾pendicular to the bias field which induces the spin-flip and thus excites the magnon mode in YIG. The lowest order ferromagnetic resonance mode consists of a u… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Controlling heat flow at the quantum level is a key challenge for next-generation quantum technologies, including thermal management and quantum information processing. Here, we investigate quantum heat transport in an asymmetrically driven hybrid magnon-photon system in contact with two thermal baths at different temperatures. We demonstrate that external driving of the magnonic subsystem provides a versatile control knob for tailoring steady-state heat currents and their asymmetry. We identify the mechanisms governing thermal rectification in the hybrid system: we find that strong rectification emerges in the regime of weak magnon-photon hybridization combined with intense magnon driving. In this regime, the external drive enables control over both the magnitude and direction of the heat current, allowing the rectification parameter to be tuned across its entire physically accessible range.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates quantum heat transport in an asymmetrically driven hybrid magnon-photon system coupled to two thermal baths. It claims that external driving of the magnonic subsystem serves as a control knob for steady-state heat currents and their asymmetry, with strong rectification emerging specifically in the weak magnon-photon hybridization regime combined with intense magnon driving; in this regime the rectification parameter can be tuned across its full physically accessible range.

Significance. If the central claim holds under the stated approximations, the work identifies a practical route to tunable quantum heat rectification via magnon driving in hybrid systems, which could be relevant for quantum thermal management. The identification of the weak-hybridization plus strong-driving regime as enabling full-range control is a potentially useful observation, provided the open-system model remains valid there.

major comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical model / master-equation derivation] The rectification-tuning result rests on the applicability of a standard driven Lindblad master equation (or equivalent) when the magnon drive amplitude greatly exceeds the magnon-photon hybridization while the system remains weakly coupled to the baths. No explicit check of the Born-Markov or secular approximations is indicated for this regime, where high magnon occupation numbers could violate the assumptions used to derive the dissipators.
  2. [Results on rectification parameter tuning] The abstract states that the rectification parameter can be tuned across its entire physically accessible range in the identified regime, but without reported comparisons (e.g., drive strength versus bath coupling rates or hybridization) confirming that the master-equation description remains accurate, the load-bearing claim lacks demonstrated support.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of the key parameter hierarchy (e.g., drive vs. hybridization vs. bath rates) that defines the reported regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The two major comments both concern the validity of the driven Lindblad master equation in the strong-driving, weak-hybridization regime. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Theoretical model / master-equation derivation] The rectification-tuning result rests on the applicability of a standard driven Lindblad master equation (or equivalent) when the magnon drive amplitude greatly exceeds the magnon-photon hybridization while the system remains weakly coupled to the baths. No explicit check of the Born-Markov or secular approximations is indicated for this regime, where high magnon occupation numbers could violate the assumptions used to derive the dissipators.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit discussion of the regime of validity is needed. The derivation assumes weak system-bath coupling (Born-Markov) and that the drive is treated as a coherent term while the dissipators remain in the standard form. High magnon occupation is possible, but the secular approximation holds provided the bath spectral densities vary slowly on the scale of the relevant frequencies and the drive-induced coherences do not invalidate the rotating-wave treatment. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the methods section together with an appendix that (i) states the quantitative conditions (drive amplitude ≪ inverse bath correlation time, hybridization ≪ bath coupling rates), (ii) estimates the steady-state magnon number under the parameters used for full-range rectification, and (iii) confirms that the chosen parameter window satisfies the inequalities. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on rectification parameter tuning] The abstract states that the rectification parameter can be tuned across its entire physically accessible range in the identified regime, but without reported comparisons (e.g., drive strength versus bath coupling rates or hybridization) confirming that the master-equation description remains accurate, the load-bearing claim lacks demonstrated support.

    Authors: We accept that the abstract claim requires supporting evidence that the master-equation description remains accurate precisely where full-range tuning is reported. In the revised manuscript we will include a new figure (or panel) that plots the drive amplitude against the bath coupling strength and the magnon-photon hybridization for the parameter sets that achieve rectification values spanning the full physical interval. This will explicitly delineate the region where the Born-Markov and secular conditions are satisfied while the rectification parameter reaches its extrema, thereby anchoring the central claim to the regime of validity of the model. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper models a driven magnon-photon hybrid system using a standard Lindblad master equation for the open quantum system, computes the steady-state density matrix, and extracts heat currents and the rectification parameter from the resulting expressions. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the reported tunability of rectification with drive amplitude is an output of the model equations rather than an input renamed as a prediction. The derivation remains self-contained against the stated Hamiltonian and dissipators without circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on unstated modeling assumptions typical of open quantum systems that cannot be audited here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5671 in / 1081 out tokens · 49379 ms · 2026-05-23T00:58:32.641470+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Senior, A

    J. Senior, A. Gubaydullin, B. Karimi, J. T. Peltonen, J. Ankerhold, and J. P. Pekola, Heat rectification via a su- perconducting artificial atom, Communications Physics 3, 40 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    S. Wolf, D. Awschalom, R. Buhrman, J. Daughton, v. S. von Moln´ ar, M. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. Treger, Spintronics: a spin-based electronics vision for the future, science 294, 1488 (2001)

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Poulsen and N

    K. Poulsen and N. T. Zinner, Giant magnetoresistance in boundary-driven spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 077203 (2021). 7

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    S¨ a¨ askilahti, J

    K. S¨ a¨ askilahti, J. Oksanen, and J. Tulkki, Thermal bal- ance and quantum heat transport in nanostructures ther- malized by local langevin heat baths, Phys. Rev. E 88, 012128 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    N. Li, J. Ren, L. Wang, G. Zhang, P. H¨ anggi, and B. Li, Colloquium: Phononics: Manipulating heat flow with electronic analogs and beyond, Rev. Mod. Phys. 84, 1045 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    N. A. Roberts and D. Walker, A review of thermal rec- tification observations and models in solid materials, In- ternational Journal of Thermal Sciences 50, 648 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Ptaszy´ nski and M

    K. Ptaszy´ nski and M. Esposito, Thermodynamics of quantum information flows, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 150603 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Bouton, J

    Q. Bouton, J. Nettersheim, S. Burgardt, D. Adam, E. Lutz, and A. Widera, A quantum heat engine driven by atomic collisions, Nature Communications 12, 2063 (2021)

    work page 2063

  10. [10]

    A. Levy, R. Alicki, and R. Kosloff, Quantum refrigerators and the third law of thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. E 85, 061126 (2012)

    work page 2012

  11. [11]

    N. M. Myers, O. Abah, and S. Deffner, Quan- tum thermodynamic devices: From theoretical propos- als to experimental reality, AVS quantum science 4, https://doi.org/10.1116/5.0083192 (2022)

    work page doi:10.1116/5.0083192 2022

  12. [12]

    Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, R

    D. Gelbwaser-Klimovsky, R. Alicki, and G. Kurizki, Min- imal universal quantum heat machine, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012140 (2013)

    work page 2013

  13. [13]

    Wang, X.-M

    C. Wang, X.-M. Chen, K.-W. Sun, and J. Ren, Heat am- plification and negative differential thermal conductance in a strongly coupled nonequilibrium spin-boson system, Physical Review A 97, 052112 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    J. Du, W. Shen, S. Su, and J. Chen, Quantum thermal management devices based on strong coupling qubits, Physical Review E 99, 062123 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    B.-q. Guo, T. Liu, and C.-s. Yu, Multifunctional quantum thermal device utilizing three qubits, Physical Review E 99, 032112 (2019)

    work page 2019

  16. [16]

    Majland, K

    M. Majland, K. S. Christensen, and N. T. Zinner, Quan- tum thermal transistor in superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. B 101, 184510 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [17]

    Mandarino, K

    A. Mandarino, K. Joulain, M. D. G´ omez, and B. Bellomo, Thermal transistor effect in quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Appl. 16, 034026 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    Mandarino, K

    A. Mandarino, K. Joulain, M. D. G´ omez, and B. Bellomo, Thermal transistor effect in quantum systems, Physical Review Applied 16, 034026 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [19]

    A. H. Malavazi, B. Ahmadi, P. Mazurek, and A. Man- darino, Detuning effects for heat-current control in quan- tum thermal devices, Physical Review E 109, 064146 (2024)

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Yang, Y.-q

    Y.-j. Yang, Y.-q. Liu, Z. Liu, and C.-s. Yu, Magnetically controlled quantum thermal devices via three nearest- neighbor coupled spin-1/2 systems, Phys. Rev. E 109, 014142 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Segal and A

    D. Segal and A. Nitzan, Spin-boson thermal rectifier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 034301 (2005)

    work page 2005

  22. [22]

    Yan, C.-Q

    Y. Yan, C.-Q. Wu, and B. Li, Control of heat transport in quantum spin systems, Phys. Rev. B 79, 014207 (2009)

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Werlang, M

    T. Werlang, M. A. Marchiori, M. F. Cornelio, and D. Va- lente, Optimal rectification in the ultrastrong coupling regime, Phys. Rev. E 89, 062109 (2014)

    work page 2014

  24. [24]

    Marcos-Vicioso, C

    A. Marcos-Vicioso, C. L´ opez-Jurado, M. Ruiz-Garcia, and R. S´ anchez, Thermal rectification with interacting electronic channels: Exploiting degeneracy, quantum su- perpositions, and interference, Phys. Rev. B 98, 035414 (2018)

    work page 2018

  25. [25]

    Goury and R

    D. Goury and R. S´ anchez, Reversible thermal diode and energy harvester with a superconducting quantum inter- ference single-electron transistor, Applied Physics Letters 115, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5109100 (2019)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5109100 2019

  26. [26]

    Kargı, M

    C. Kargı, M. T. Naseem, T. Opatrn` y, ¨O. E. M¨ uste- caplıo˘ glu, and G. Kurizki, Quantum optical two-atom thermal diode, Physical Review E 99, 042121 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Upadhyay, M

    V. Upadhyay, M. T. Naseem, R. Marathe, and ¨O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, Heat rectification by two qubits coupled with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interaction, Physical Review E 104, 054137 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Ivander, N

    F. Ivander, N. Anto-Sztrikacs, and D. Segal, Quantum coherence-control of thermal energy transport: the v model as a case study, New Journal of Physics24, 103010 (2022)

    work page 2022

  29. [29]

    Poulsen, A

    K. Poulsen, A. C. Santos, L. B. Kristensen, and N. T. Zinner, Entanglement-enhanced quantum rectification, Phys. Rev. A 105, 052605 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    Khandelwal, M

    S. Khandelwal, M. Perarnau-Llobet, S. Seah, N. Brunner, and G. Haack, Characterizing the performance of heat rectifiers, Physical Review Research 5, 013129 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Rajapaksha, S

    A. Rajapaksha, S. D. Gunapala, and M. Premaratne, Enhanced thermal rectification in coupled qutrit–qubit quantum thermal diode, APL Quantum1, 046123 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Liu, Y.-j

    Y.-q. Liu, Y.-j. Yang, T.-t. Ma, Z. Liu, and C.-s. Yu, Quantum heat valve and diode of strongly coupled de- fects in amorphous material, Phys. Rev. E 109, 014137 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Riera-Campeny, M

    A. Riera-Campeny, M. Mehboudi, M. Pons, and A. San- pera, Dynamically induced heat rectification in quantum systems, Physical Review E 99, 032126 (2019)

    work page 2019

  34. [34]

    T. J. Alexander, High-heat-flux rectification due to a lo- calized thermal diode, Phys. Rev. E 101, 062122 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Iorio, E

    A. Iorio, E. Strambini, G. Haack, M. Campisi, and F. Gi- azotto, Photonic heat rectification in a system of coupled qubits, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054050 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    M. A. Sim´ on, A. Ala˜ na, M. Pons, A. Ruiz-Garc´ ıa, and J. G. Muga, Heat rectification with a minimal model of two harmonic oscillators, Phys. Rev. E 103, 012134 (2021)

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    Stevenson and B

    C. Stevenson and B. Braunecker, Decoupled heat and charge rectification as a many-body effect in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115413 (2021)

    work page 2021

  38. [38]

    Palafox, R

    S. Palafox, R. Rom´ an-Ancheyta, B. i. e. i. f. m. c. C ¸ akmak, and O. E. M¨ ustecaplıo˘ glu, Heat transport and rectification via quantum statistical and coherence asym- metries, Phys. Rev. E 106, 054114 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Liu, Y.-j

    Y.-q. Liu, Y.-j. Yang, T.-t. Ma, and C.-s. Yu, Quantum heat valve and entanglement in superconducting lc res- onators, Applied Physics Letters 123, 144002 (2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    A. Seif, W. DeGottardi, K. Esfarjani, and M. Hafezi, Thermal management and non-reciprocal control of phonon flow via optomechanics, Nature Communications 9, 10.1038/s41467-018-03624-y (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03624-y 2018

  41. [41]

    Bhandari, P

    B. Bhandari, P. A. Erdman, R. Fazio, E. Paladino, and F. Taddei, Thermal rectification through a nonlin- ear quantum resonator, Physical Review B 103, 155434 (2021)

    work page 2021

  42. [42]

    Wu and D

    L.-A. Wu and D. Segal, Sufficient conditions for thermal rectification in hybrid quantum structures, Physical re- 8 view letters 102, 095503 (2009)

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    Kalantar, B

    N. Kalantar, B. K. Agarwalla, and D. Segal, Harmonic chains and the thermal diode effect, Phys. Rev. E 103, 052130 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    G. T. Landi, E. Novais, M. J. de Oliveira, and D. Karevski, Flux rectification in the quantumxxz chain, Phys. Rev. E 90, 042142 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Ordonez-Miranda, Y

    J. Ordonez-Miranda, Y. Ezzahri, and K. Joulain, Quan- tum thermal diode based on two interacting spinlike sys- tems under different excitations, Phys. Rev. E95, 022128 (2017)

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    Balachandran, G

    V. Balachandran, G. Benenti, E. Pereira, G. Casati, and D. Poletti, Heat current rectification in segmented xxz chains, Phys. Rev. E 99, 032136 (2019)

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    J. J. Mendoza-Arenas and S. R. Clark, Giant rectifica- tion in strongly interacting driven tilted systems, PRX Quantum 5, 010341 (2024)

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Balachandran, G

    V. Balachandran, G. Benenti, E. Pereira, G. Casati, and D. Poletti, Perfect diode in quantum spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 200603 (2018)

    work page 2018

  49. [49]

    Jiang, M

    J.-H. Jiang, M. Kulkarni, D. Segal, and Y. Imry, Phonon thermoelectric transistors and rectifiers, Phys. Rev. B92, 045309 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    A. A. Aligia, D. P. Daroca, L. Arrachea, and P. Roura- Bas, Heat current across a capacitively coupled double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 101, 075417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  51. [51]

    M. Xu, J. T. Stockburger, and J. Ankerhold, Heat trans- port through a superconducting artificial atom, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104304 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifen- stein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferri- magnetic insulator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  53. [53]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, A. Gloppe, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybrid quantum systems based on magnonics, Applied Physics Express 12, 070101 (2019)

    work page 2019

  55. [55]

    Li, Y.-P

    J. Li, Y.-P. Wang, W.-J. Wu, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. You, Quantum network with magnonic and mechanical nodes, PRX Quantum 2, 040344 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    C. A. Potts, E. Varga, V. A. S. V. Bittencourt, S. V. Kusminskiy, and J. P. Davis, Dynamical backaction mag- nomechanics, Phys. Rev. X 11, 031053 (2021)

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  58. [58]

    Osada, R

    A. Osada, R. Hisatomi, A. Noguchi, Y. Tabuchi, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, M. Nomura, and Y. Nakamura, Cavity optomagnonics with spin-orbit coupled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 223601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Quantum magnon- ics: The magnon meets the superconducting qubit, Comptes Rendus Physique 17, 729 (2016)

    work page 2016

  60. [60]

    H. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Physics Reports 965, 1 (2022), quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science

    work page 2022

  61. [61]

    M. S. Ebrahimi, A. Motazedifard, and M. B. Harouni, Single-quadrature quantum magnetometry in cavity elec- tromagnonics, Phys. Rev. A 103, 062605 (2021)

    work page 2021

  62. [62]

    C. O. Edet, M. Asjad, D. Dutykh, N. Ali, and O. Abah, Entropy production rate and correlations in a cavity mag- nomechanical system, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 033037 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [63]

    Crescini, C

    N. Crescini, C. Braggio, G. Carugno, R. Di Vora, A. Or- tolan, and G. Ruoso, Magnon-driven dynamics of a hy- brid system excited with ultrafast optical pulses, Com- munications Physics 3, 164 (2020)

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Sun, S.-S

    F.-X. Sun, S.-S. Zheng, Y. Xiao, Q. Gong, Q. He, and K. Xia, Remote generation of magnon schr¨ odinger cat state via magnon-photon entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 087203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Gorini, A

    V. Gorini, A. Kossakowski, and E. C. G. Sudarshan, Completely positive dynamical semigroups of n-level sys- tems, Journal of Mathematical Physics 17, 821 (1976)

    work page 1976

  66. [66]

    Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    G. Lindblad, On the generators of quantum dynamical semigroups, Communications in Mathematical Physics 48, 119 (1976)

    work page 1976

  67. [67]

    Breuer and F

    H.-P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, The theory of open quantum systems (Oxford University Press, USA, 2002)

    work page 2002

  68. [68]

    G. T. Landi, Quantum information and quantum noise, en. graduate course in Quantum Information and Quan- tum noise (2018)

    work page 2018

  69. [69]

    De Chiara, G

    G. De Chiara, G. Landi, A. Hewgill, B. Reid, A. Ferraro, A. J. Roncaglia, and M. Antezza, Reconciliation of quan- tum local master equations with thermodynamics, New Journal of Physics 20, 113024 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [70]

    Joulain, J

    K. Joulain, J. Drevillon, Y. Ezzahri, and J. Ordonez- Miranda, Quantum thermal transistor, Physical review letters 116, 200601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  71. [71]

    Ruokola, T

    T. Ruokola, T. Ojanen, and A.-P. Jauho, Thermal recti- fication in nonlinear quantum circuits, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 79, 144306 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [72]

    Li, S.-Y

    J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and G. Agarwal, Magnon-photon- phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Physi- cal review letters 121, 203601 (2018)

    work page 2018