Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

VisualSimpleQA: A Benchmark for Decoupled Evaluation of Large Vision-Language Models in Fact-Seeking Question Answering

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06492 v1 pith:YALVU555 submitted 2025-03-09 cs.CL cs.CV

classification cs.CLcs.CV
keywords fact-seekingmodelsvisualsimpleqadecoupledevaluationlvlmsmultimodalanswering
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large vision-language models (LVLMs) have demonstrated remarkable achievements, yet the generation of non-factual responses remains prevalent in fact-seeking question answering (QA). Current multimodal fact-seeking benchmarks primarily focus on comparing model outputs to ground truth answers, providing limited insights into the performance of modality-specific modules. To bridge this gap, we introduce VisualSimpleQA, a multimodal fact-seeking benchmark with two key features. First, it enables streamlined and decoupled evaluation of LVLMs in visual and linguistic modalities. Second, it incorporates well-defined difficulty criteria to guide human annotation and facilitates the extraction of a challenging subset, VisualSimpleQA-hard. Experiments on 15 LVLMs show that even state-of-the-art models such as GPT-4o achieve merely 60%+ correctness in multimodal fact-seeking QA on VisualSimpleQA and 30%+ on VisualSimpleQA-hard. Furthermore, the decoupled evaluation across these models highlights substantial opportunities for improvement in both visual and linguistic modules. The dataset is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/WYLing/VisualSimpleQA.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CRAG-MM-Diagnostics: Enabling Stage-Wise Analysis of Knowledge-Intensive VQA

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Stage-wise annotations on CRAG-MM show that knowledge retrieval and reasoning, not visual grounding or object identification, is the dominant bottleneck in knowledge-intensive VQA.

  2. Seeing is Believing, but How Much? A Comprehensive Analysis of Verbalized Calibration in Vision-Language Models

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Current vision-language models are largely miscalibrated when they verbalize confidence, visual reasoning models such as o3 and o4-mini are better calibrated, and Visual Confidence-Aware Prompting reduces ECE on IsoBench.

Pith tools