Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Delusions of Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06709 v1 pith:6RFKOCHZ submitted 2025-03-09 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords delusionshallucinationsmodeldelusionharderhighincorrectlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models often generate factually incorrect but plausible outputs, known as hallucinations. We identify a more insidious phenomenon, LLM delusion, defined as high belief hallucinations, incorrect outputs with abnormally high confidence, making them harder to detect and mitigate. Unlike ordinary hallucinations, delusions persist with low uncertainty, posing significant challenges to model reliability. Through empirical analysis across different model families and sizes on several Question Answering tasks, we show that delusions are prevalent and distinct from hallucinations. LLMs exhibit lower honesty with delusions, which are harder to override via finetuning or self reflection. We link delusion formation with training dynamics and dataset noise and explore mitigation strategies such as retrieval augmented generation and multi agent debating to mitigate delusions. By systematically investigating the nature, prevalence, and mitigation of LLM delusions, our study provides insights into the underlying causes of this phenomenon and outlines future directions for improving model reliability.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Distributed Agent System: Fault-Tolerant Collaboration Among Embodied Agents

    cs.MA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    DAS reframes industrial agent reliability as two-layer fault tolerance—single-agent reliability alignment plus semi-formal cross-agent protocols—instead of zero-error single-turn accuracy.

Pith tools