Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Painting with Words: Elevating Detailed Image Captioning with Benchmark and Alignment Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.07906 v1 pith:BFG4ZQK3 submitted 2025-03-10 cs.CV

Painting with Words: Elevating Detailed Image Captioning with Benchmark and Alignment Learning

classification cs.CV
keywords captioningdetailedimagedcscoreevaluationacrossbenchmarksdecapbench
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Image captioning has long been a pivotal task in visual understanding, with recent advancements in vision-language models (VLMs) significantly enhancing the ability to generate detailed image captions. However, the evaluation of detailed image captioning remains underexplored due to outdated evaluation metrics and coarse annotations. In this paper, we introduce DeCapBench along with a novel metric, DCScore, specifically designed for detailed captioning tasks. DCScore evaluates hallucinations and fine-grained comprehensiveness by deconstructing responses into the smallest self-sufficient units, termed primitive information units, and assessing them individually. Our evaluation shows that DCScore aligns more closely with human judgment than other rule-based or model-based metrics. Concurrently, DeCapBench exhibits a high correlation with VLM arena results on descriptive tasks, surpassing existing benchmarks for vision-language models. Additionally, we present an automatic fine-grained feedback collection method, FeedQuill, for preference optimization based on our advanced metric, showing robust generalization capabilities across auto-generated preference data. Extensive experiments on multiple VLMs demonstrate that our method not only significantly reduces hallucinations but also enhances performance across various benchmarks, achieving superior detail captioning performance while surpassing GPT-4o.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. CaptionQA: Is Your Caption as Useful as the Image Itself?

    cs.CV 2025-11 conditional novelty 7.0

    CaptionQA is a new benchmark with 33,027 questions across natural, document, e-commerce, and embodied AI domains that measures how much utility model-generated captions retain compared to original images when used by ...

  2. ReShift: Aha-Moment-Driven Reasoning-Level Backdoor Attacks on Vision-Language Models

    cs.CR 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    ReShift is a reasoning-level backdoor framework for VLMs that uses poisoned data construction and joint optimization to shift CoT trajectories on trigger while preserving surface coherence.

  3. SPECS: Specificity-Enhanced CLIP-Score for Long Image Caption Evaluation

    cs.CV 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0

    A new reference-free metric, SPECS, fine-tunes LongCLIP with a specificity objective and reaches LLM-level human correlation on long captions at a fraction of the computational cost.