Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Mellow: a small audio language model for reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.08540 v1 pith:7MW6RI4L submitted 2025-03-11 cs.SD cs.AIeess.AS

classification cs.SDcs.AIeess.AS
keywords reasoningaudiomodelsmellowdatasmallaudio-languagemodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Audio-Language Models (ALMs) can understand and reason over both audio and text. Typically, reasoning performance correlates with model size, with the best results achieved by models exceeding 8 billion parameters. However, no prior work has explored enabling small audio-language models to perform reasoning tasks, despite the potential applications for edge devices. To address this gap, we introduce Mellow, a small Audio-Language Model specifically designed for reasoning. Mellow achieves state-of-the-art performance among existing small audio-language models and surpasses several larger models in reasoning capabilities. For instance, Mellow scores 52.11 on MMAU, comparable to SoTA Qwen2 Audio (which scores 52.5) while using 50 times fewer parameters and being trained on 60 times less data (audio hrs). To train Mellow, we introduce ReasonAQA, a dataset designed to enhance audio-grounded reasoning in models. It consists of a mixture of existing datasets (30% of the data) and synthetically generated data (70%). The synthetic dataset is derived from audio captioning datasets, where Large Language Models (LLMs) generate detailed and multiple-choice questions focusing on audio events, objects, acoustic scenes, signal properties, semantics, and listener emotions. To evaluate Mellow's reasoning ability, we benchmark it on a diverse set of tasks, assessing on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution data, including audio understanding, deductive reasoning, and comparative reasoning. Finally, we conduct extensive ablation studies to explore the impact of projection layer choices, synthetic data generation methods, and language model pretraining on reasoning performance. Our training dataset, findings, and baseline pave the way for developing small ALMs capable of reasoning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Unified Audio Intelligence Without Regressing on Text Intelligence

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A unified 30B MoE audio-text LLM achieves state-of-the-art audio understanding, generation, and speech tasks while preserving text reasoning comparable to its text-only backbone.

  2. Audio-Cogito: Towards Deep Audio Reasoning in Large Audio Language Models

    eess.AS 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Self-distillation of Qwen3-Omni-Thinking on 545k Cogito-Pipe audio reasoning traces yields the best open-source MMAR CoT scores and top-tier challenge ranking.

  3. WoW-Bench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Acoustic Perception in Audio-Language Models via Marine Mammal Vocalizations

    cs.SD 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    WoW-Bench shows current audio-language models are far worse than humans at fine-grained acoustic perception tasks on out-of-distribution marine mammal vocalizations.

  4. OpenBEATs: A Fully Open-Source General-Purpose Audio Encoder

    cs.SD 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OpenBEATs releases the BEATs audio pretraining pipeline, trains 300M-parameter models on 20k hours of multi-domain audio, and reports strong results across 25 datasets, including bioacoustics and reasoning tasks.

  5. Empowering Multimodal LLMs with External Tools: A Comprehensive Survey

    cs.CV 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    A survey paper maps how external tools are used to augment multimodal large language models across data, tasks, evaluation, and future directions.

Pith tools