Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unreflected Use of Tabular Data Repositories Can Undermine Research Quality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.09159 v1 pith:4C4IJBVF submitted 2025-03-12 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords datadatasetsrepositoriesresearchtabularqualityinappropriatelarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Data repositories have accumulated a large number of tabular datasets from various domains. Machine Learning researchers are actively using these datasets to evaluate novel approaches. Consequently, data repositories have an important standing in tabular data research. They not only host datasets but also provide information on how to use them in supervised learning tasks. In this paper, we argue that, despite great achievements in usability, the unreflected usage of datasets from data repositories may have led to reduced research quality and scientific rigor. We present examples from prominent recent studies that illustrate the problematic use of datasets from OpenML, a large data repository for tabular data. Our illustrations help users of data repositories avoid falling into the traps of (1) using suboptimal model selection strategies, (2) overlooking strong baselines, and (3) inappropriate preprocessing. In response, we discuss possible solutions for how data repositories can prevent the inappropriate use of datasets and become the cornerstones for improved overall quality of empirical research studies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An open dataset of neural networks for hypernetwork research

    cs.LG 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A public dataset of 10,000 LeNet-5 networks split into 10 Imagenette classes is released, with a 72% Naive Bayes baseline for classifying networks by their weights.

  2. Overtuning in Hyperparameter Optimization

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Around 10% of hyperparameter optimization runs select a validation-optimal configuration that generalizes worse than the first configuration evaluated, a phenomenon the authors call overtuning.

Pith tools