Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

General Relativity and Geodesy

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.09272 v1 pith:KZUYY6WX submitted 2025-03-12 gr-qc

classification gr-qc
keywords fieldclock-baseddynamicgeneralgeodesygeoidgravitationalgravity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mass redistribution on Earth due to dynamic processes such as ice melting and sea level rise leads to a changing gravitational field, observable by geodetic techniques. Monitoring this change over time allows us to learn more about our planet and its dynamic evolution. In this paper, we highlight the impact of General Relativity (GR) on geodesy: it provides corrections essential for the interpretation of high-precision measurements and enables a completely novel measurement approach using chronometry, i.e., clock-based observations. Focusing on the latter, we review the construction of the relativistic gravity potential and the corresponding geoid definition as an isochronometric surface to elucidate the comparison to the conventional Newtonian geoid. Furthermore, we comment on additional potentials due to the non-Newtonian degrees of freedom of the relativistic gravitational field, and assess the feasibility of clock-based measurements for Gravity Field Recovery (GFR) from space. Although clock observations in space demonstrate technical promise for GFR, achieving the necessary precision for practical applications remains challenging.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing Planck 2020 and DESI data on wCDM Models

    astro-ph.CO 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fitting four wCDM dark energy parameterizations to Planck 2020, DESI, and late-time data still favors ΛCDM, with newer data giving tighter constraints.

Pith tools