pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.11928 · v1 · submitted 2025-03-15 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Nonlinearity-driven Topology via Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

Alessandro Coppo , Alexandre Le Boit\'e , Simone Felicetti , Valentina Brosco This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 00:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topologynonlinearityKerr interactionparametric drivesymmetry breakingbulk-boundary correspondenceedge modesquantum resonators
0
0 comments X

The pith

A parametrically driven cross-Kerr resonator chain enters a nonlinearity-dictated topological phase above a drive threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors consider a chain of quantum resonators coupled exclusively by nearest-neighbor cross-Kerr interactions and subjected to parametric driving, with no quadratic tunneling present. When the drive amplitude exceeds a critical threshold, the system transitions from decoupled oscillators to a symmetry-broken phase. In this phase the topology arises from the form of the Kerr nonlinearity and produces a non-trivial bulk-boundary correspondence. Sympathetic readers would care because this provides a route to topological protection generated purely by nonlinear interactions rather than linear band structure.

Core claim

When the parametric drive overcomes a critical threshold, the system undergoes a transition to a symmetry-broken topological phase. The topology is dictated by the structure of the Kerr nonlinearity, yielding a non-trivial bulk-boundary correspondence. Different effective models apply for periodic and open boundary conditions, with analytical approximations for the low-energy spectrum that identify conditions for topological edge modes.

What carries the argument

The effective Hamiltonian generated by spontaneous symmetry breaking under parametric drive, whose topological character is fixed by the nearest-neighbor cross-Kerr coupling terms.

If this is right

  • Periodic and open boundary conditions lead to different effective models in the topological phase.
  • Analytical approximations describe the low-energy spectrum.
  • Topological edge modes appear under open boundary conditions when certain conditions on parameters are met.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the form of the nonlinearity were altered, the resulting topological invariants would change accordingly.
  • Realizations in superconducting circuits could allow experimental tuning across the transition to observe the edge modes.

Load-bearing premise

The combination of parametric drive and nearest-neighbor cross-Kerr coupling without quadratic tunneling produces spontaneous symmetry breaking that results in an effective Hamiltonian with topology determined by the Kerr terms.

What would settle it

The absence of edge modes in the spectrum of an open-boundary chain when the drive is above threshold, or their presence below threshold, would falsify the predicted nonlinearity-driven topological phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.11928 by Alessandro Coppo, Alexandre Le Boit\'e, Simone Felicetti, Valentina Brosco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Topology and nonlinearity are deeply connected. However, whether topological effects can arise solely from the structure of nonlinear interaction terms, and the nature of the resulting topological phases, remain to large extent open questions. Here we consider a chain of parametrically-driven quantum resonators coupled only via weak nearest-neighbour cross-Kerr interaction, without any quadratic tunneling term. We show that, when the drive overcomes a critical threshold value, the system undergoes a transition from the atomic limit of decoupled oscillators to a symmetry-broken topological phase. The topology is dictated by the structure of the Kerr nonlinearity, yielding a non-trivial bulk-boundary correspondence. In the topological phase, we find different effective models for periodic and open boundary conditions and derive analytical approximations for the low-energy spectrum, identifying the conditions to observe topological edge modes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a chain of parametrically driven quantum resonators coupled solely by weak nearest-neighbor cross-Kerr interactions, with no quadratic tunneling term. It claims that above a critical drive amplitude the system undergoes spontaneous symmetry breaking, departing from the atomic limit and entering a topological phase whose topology is fixed by the structure of the Kerr nonlinearity. This yields a non-trivial bulk-boundary correspondence. Distinct effective models are derived for periodic versus open boundary conditions; analytical approximations to the low-energy spectrum are obtained and conditions for the visibility of topological edge modes are identified.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work supplies a concrete route to nonlinearity-driven topology that does not rely on linear hopping or externally imposed band structures. The explicit construction of effective Hamiltonians after symmetry breaking, the demonstration of different PBC/OBC spectra, and the analytical edge-mode conditions constitute reusable technical contributions. These elements are particularly useful for circuit-QED and nonlinear-optics platforms where cross-Kerr couplings are naturally present.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'analytical approximations for the low-energy spectrum' are derived but does not indicate their functional form or the order of the expansion; a single illustrative expression would improve readability.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the broken-symmetry vacuum and the subsequent Bogoliubov transformation is introduced without an explicit reference to the section where the vacuum expectation values are first computed; cross-referencing would aid navigation.
  3. [Results] Figure captions for the edge-mode plots do not state the precise parameter values (drive strength relative to threshold, Kerr strength) used; adding these values would make the figures self-contained.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, including the recognition of the technical contributions regarding effective Hamiltonians, PBC/OBC distinctions, and edge-mode conditions. The recommendation of minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives the emergence of a symmetry-broken topological phase from the structure of the nearest-neighbor cross-Kerr nonlinearity under parametric drive above threshold, with distinct effective models obtained via expansion around the broken-symmetry vacuum for PBC versus OBC. No equations reduce to inputs by construction, no parameters are fitted and then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems from prior author work are invoked to force the topology. The bulk-boundary correspondence and edge-mode conditions follow directly from the model Hamiltonian without renaming known results or smuggling ansatzes. This is the normal case of an internally consistent first-principles derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard quantum-optics assumptions for parametrically driven resonators and cross-Kerr coupling; no free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are stated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The physical system consists of a chain of parametrically driven quantum resonators interacting only via weak nearest-neighbor cross-Kerr terms.
    This is the Hamiltonian definition used throughout the work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5665 in / 1223 out tokens · 52716 ms · 2026-05-23T00:56:34.214253+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Higgs-like

    does not guarantee the emergence of protected Gaus- sian edge modes. Finally, we show how topological edge modes can be restored by small corrections to the bound- ary sites. Model – We consider a chain of 2 N Kerr resonators with frequency ωand parametric driving λ, as sketched in Fig. 1. We assume that nearest-neighbor resonators are coupled only via cr...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, 2011)

    work page 2011

  3. [3]

    Kitaev, V

    A. Kitaev, V. Lebedev, and M. Feigel’man, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, in AIP Conf. Proc., Vol. 1134 (2009) pp. 22–30

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topological insulators, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    C. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classi- fication of topological quantum matter with symmetries, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Kane, Topological band theory and the Z2 invariant, in Topological Insulators (Elsevier, 2013) Chap

    C. Kane, Topological band theory and the Z2 invariant, in Topological Insulators (Elsevier, 2013) Chap. 1, pp. 3–34

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

    work page 1982

  9. [9]

    D. J. Thouless, Quantization of particle transport, Phys. Rev. B 27, 6083 (1983)

    work page 1983

  10. [10]

    Jackiw and C

    R. Jackiw and C. Rebbi, Solitons with fermion number, Phys. Rev. D 13, 3398 (1976)

    work page 1976

  11. [11]

    Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys

    Y. Hatsugai, Chern number and edge states in the integer quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3697 (1993)

    work page 1993

  12. [12]

    Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep

    S. Rachel, Interacting topological insulators: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys. 81, 116501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    J¨ urgensen, S

    M. J¨ urgensen, S. Mukherjee, C. J¨ org, and M. C. Rechts- man, Quantized fractional Thouless pumping of solitons, Nat. Phys. 19, 420 (2023)

    work page 2023

  14. [14]

    Mostaan, F

    N. Mostaan, F. Grusdt, and N. Goldman, Quantized topological pumping of solitons in nonlinear photonics and ultracold atomic mixtures, Nat. Comm. 13, 5997 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    K. Sone, E. Motohiko, A. Yuto, Y. Nobuyuki, and S. Takahiro, Nonlinearity-induced topological phase tran- sition characterized by the nonlinear Chern number, Nat. Phys. 20, 1164 (2024)

    work page 2024

  16. [16]

    Jezequel and P

    L. Jezequel and P. Delplace, Nonlinear edge modes from topological one-dimensional lattices, Phys. Rev. B 105, 035410 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Isobe, T

    T. Isobe, T. Yoshida, and Y. Hatsugai, Bulk-Edge corre- spondence for nonlinear eigenvalue problems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 126601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Brunelli, C

    M. Brunelli, C. C. Wanjura, and A. Nunnenkamp, Restoration of the non-Hermitian bulk-boundary corre- spondence via topological amplification, SciPost Phys. 15, 173 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    X. G. Wen and Q. Niu, Ground-state degeneracy of the fractional quantum Hall states in the presence of a random potential and on high-genus Riemann surfaces, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9377 (1990)

    work page 1990

  20. [20]

    Kitaev and J

    A. Kitaev and J. Preskill, Topological entanglement en- tropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110404 (2006)

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    Levin and X

    M. Levin and X. G. Wen, Detecting topological order in a 6 ground state wave function, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 110405 (2006)

    work page 2006

  22. [22]

    W. P. Su and J. R. Schrieffer, Fractionally charged exci- tations in charge-density-wave systems with commensu- rability 3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 738 (1981)

    work page 1981

  23. [23]

    Arovas, J

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984)

    work page 1984

  24. [24]

    X. G. Wen, Topological orders and edge excitations in fractional quantum Hall states, inField Theory, Topology and Condensed Matter Physics (Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 1995) pp. 155–176

    work page 1995

  25. [25]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological photonics, Nat. Photonics 8, 821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Carusotto and C

    I. Carusotto and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 299 (2013)

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    X. Gu, A. F. Kockum, A. Miranowicz, Y. Liu, and F. Nori, Microwave photonics with superconducting quantum circuits, Phys. Rep. 718-719, 1 (2017)

    work page 2017

  28. [28]

    Carmichael, Breakdown of Photon Blockade: A dis- sipative quantum phase transition in zero dimensions, Phys

    H. Carmichael, Breakdown of Photon Blockade: A dis- sipative quantum phase transition in zero dimensions, Phys. Rev. X 5, 031028 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Casteels, F

    W. Casteels, F. Storme, A. Le Boit´ e, and C. Ciuti, Power laws in the dynamic hysteresis of quantum nonlinear pho- tonic resonators, Phys. Rev. A 93, 033824 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Bartolo, F

    N. Bartolo, F. Minganti, W. Casteels, and C. Ciuti, Exact steady state of a kerr resonator with one- and two-photon driving and dissipation: controllable Wigner- function multimodality and dissipative phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 94, 033841 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    M. I. Dykman, Fluctuating Nonlinear Oscillators: From Nanomechanics to Quantum Superconducting Circuits (Oxford University Press, 2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [32]

    Minganti, L

    F. Minganti, L. Garbe, A. Le Boit´ e, and S. Felicetti, Non- Gaussian superradiant transition via three-body ultra- strong coupling, Phys. Rev. A 107, 013715 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    Fitzpatrick, N

    M. Fitzpatrick, N. M. Sundaresan, A. C. Li, J. Koch, and A. A. Houck, Observation of a Dissipative phase transi- tion in a one-dimensional circuit QED lattice, Phys. Rev. X 7, 011016 (2017)

    work page 2017

  34. [34]

    Brookes, G

    P. Brookes, G. Tancredi, A. D. Patterson, J. Rahamim, M. Esposito, T. K. Mavrogordatos, P. J. Leek, E. Gi- nossar, and M. H. Szymanska, Critical slowing down in circuit quantum electrodynamics, Sci. Adv. 7, eabe9492 (2021)

    work page 2021

  35. [35]

    Q. Chen, M. Fischer, Y. Nojiri, M. Renger, E. Xie, M. Partanen, S. Pogorzalek, K. G. Fedorov, A. Marx, F. Deppe, and R. Gross, Quantum behavior of a su- perconducting Duffing oscillator at the dissipative phase transition, Nat. Comm. 14, 2896 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Zheng, W

    R. Zheng, W. Ning, Y. H. Chen, J. H. L¨ u, L. T. Shen, K. Xu, Y. R. Zhang, D. Xu, H. Li, Y. Xia, F. Wu, Z. B. Yang, A. Miranowicz, N. Lambert, D. Zheng, H. Fan, F. Nori, and S. Zheng, Observation of a superradiant phase transition with emergent cat states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 113601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Beaulieu, F

    G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, V. Savona, S. Fe- licetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Observation of first- and second-order dissipative phase transitions in a two-photon driven Kerr resonator, Nat. Comm. 16, 1954 (2025)

    work page 1954

  38. [38]

    Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a single qubit and a single oscillator, Phys

    S. Ashhab, Superradiance transition in a system with a single qubit and a single oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 87, 013826 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    M. J. Hwang, R. Puebla, and M. B. Plenio, Quantum phase transition and universal dynamics in the Rabi model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 180404 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    J. Peng, E. Rico, J. Zhong, E. Solano, and I. L. Egusquiza, Unified superradiant phase transitions, Phys. Rev. A 100, 063820 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Felicetti and A

    S. Felicetti and A. Le Boit´ e, Universal spectral features of ultrastrongly coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 040404 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    Poot and H

    M. Poot and H. S. van der Zant, Mechanical systems in the quantum regime, Phys. Rep. 511, 273 (2012)

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    P. D. Drummond and D. F. Walls, Quantum theory of optical bistability. I. Nonlinear polarisability model, J. Phys. A 13, 725 (1980)

    work page 1980

  44. [44]

    Arenz, C

    C. Arenz, C. Cormick, D. Vitali, and G. Morigi, Genera- tion of two-mode entangled states by quantum reservoir engineering, J. Phys. B 46, 224001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [45]

    Drummond, K

    P. Drummond, K. McNeil, and D. Walls, Non-equilibrium transitions in sub/second harmonic generation, Int. J. Opt. 28, 211 (1981)

    work page 1981

  46. [46]

    Calvanese Strinati and C

    M. Calvanese Strinati and C. Conti, Non-Gaussianity in the quantum parametric oscillator, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063519 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    S. Puri, S. Boutin, and A. Blais, Engineering the quan- tum states of light in a Kerr-nonlinear resonator by two- photon driving, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 18 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    Goto, Quantum computation based on quantum adi- abatic bifurcations of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscilla- tors, JPSJ 88, 061015 (2019)

    H. Goto, Quantum computation based on quantum adi- abatic bifurcations of Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscilla- tors, JPSJ 88, 061015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Grimm, N

    A. Grimm, N. E. Frattini, S. Puri, S. O. Mundhada, S. Touzard, M. Mirrahimi, S. M. Girvin, S. Shankar, and M. H. Devoret, Stabilization and operation of a Kerr-cat qubit, Nature 584, 205 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Di Candia, F

    R. Di Candia, F. Minganti, K. V. Petrovnin, G. S. Paraoanu, and S. Felicetti, Critical parametric quantum sensing, npj Quantum Inf. 9, 23 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Beaulieu, F

    G. Beaulieu, F. Minganti, S. Frasca, M. Scigliuzzo, S. Felicetti, R. Di Candia, and P. Scarlino, Criticality- enhanced quantum sensing with a parametric supercon- ducting resonator. 10.48550/arXiv.2409.19968 (2024)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.19968 2024

  52. [52]

    Petrovnin, J

    K. Petrovnin, J. Wang, M. Perelshtein, P. Hakonen, and G. S. Paraoanu, Microwave photon detection at paramet- ric criticality, PRX Quantum 5, 020342 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    A. Gu, J. Sloan, C. Roques-Carmes, S. Choi, E. I. Rosenthal, M. Horodynski, Y. Salamin, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Quantum sensitivity of parametric oscilla- tors. 10.48550/arXiv.2412.02887 (2024)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.02887 2024

  54. [54]

    Kanao and H

    T. Kanao and H. Goto, High-accuracy Ising machine us- ing Kerr-nonlinear parametric oscillators with local four- body interactions, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 18 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Zapletal, A

    P. Zapletal, A. Nunnenkamp, and M. Brunelli, Stabi- lization of multimode Schr¨ odinger cat states via normal- mode dissipation engineering, PRX Quantum 3, 010301 (2022)

    work page 2022

  56. [56]

    Calvanese Strinati and C

    M. Calvanese Strinati and C. Conti, Multidimensional hyperspin machine, Nat. Comm. 13, 7248 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    Alushi, A

    U. Alushi, A. Coppo, V. Brosco, R. Di Candia, and S. Fe- licetti, Collective quantum enhancement in critical quan- tum sensing, Commun. Phys. 8, 74 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Caleffi, M

    F. Caleffi, M. Capone, and I. Carusotto, Collective ex- citations of a strongly correlated nonequilibrium pho- ton fluid across the insulator-superfluid phase transition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 193604 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    A. Roy, M. Parto, R. Nehra, C. Leefmans, and 7 A. Marandi, Topological optical parametric oscillation, Nanophotonics 11, 1611 (2022)

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    L. X. Guo, L. L. Wan, L. G. Si, and Y. Wu, Topological amplification and frequency conversion in a photonic lat- tice with a two-photon driving, Phys. Rev. A108, 013512 (2023)

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Goren, K

    T. Goren, K. Plekhanov, F. Appas, and K. Le Hur, Topo- logical Zak phase in strongly coupled LC circuits, Phys. Rev. B 97, 041106 (2018)

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Leykam and Y

    D. Leykam and Y. D. Chong, Edge solitons in nonlinear- photonic topological insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 143901 (2016)

    work page 2016

  63. [63]

    Hadad, A

    Y. Hadad, A. B. Khanikaev, and A. Al` u, Self-induced topological transitions and edge states supported by non- linear staggered potentials, Phys. Rev. B 93, 155112 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Sone and Y

    K. Sone and Y. Hatsugai, Topological-to- topological transition induced by on-site nonlin- earity in a one-dimensional topological insulator. 10.48550/arXiv.2501.10087 (2025)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.10087 2025

  65. [65]

    Ravets, N

    S. Ravets, N. Pernet, N. Mostaan, N. Goldman, and J. Bloch, Thouless pumping in a driven-dissipative Kerr resonator array, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 093801 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    C. E. Bardyn, T. Karzig, G. Refael, and T. C. H. Liew, Chiral Bogoliubov excitations in nonlinear bosonic sys- tems, Phys. Rev. B 93, 020502 (2016)

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Rassaert, T

    L. Rassaert, T. Ramos, T. Roscilde, and D. Por- ras, Emerging non-Hermitian topology in a chiral driven-dissipative Bose-Hubbard model 10.48550/arXiv.2411.08965 (2024)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.08965 2024

  68. [68]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1698 (1979)

    work page 1979

  69. [69]

    Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

    J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2747 (1989)

    work page 1989

  70. [70]

    Hellbach, D

    F. Hellbach, D. De Bernardis, M. Saur, I. Carusotto, W. Belzig, and G. Rastelli, Nonlinearity-induced sym- metry breaking in a system of two parametrically driven Kerr-Duffing oscillators, New J. Phys. 26, 103020 (2024)

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    T. D. K¨ uhner and H. Monien, Phases of the one- dimensional Bose-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 58, R14741 (1998)

    work page 1998

  72. [72]

    Rossini and R

    D. Rossini and R. Fazio, Phase diagram of the extended Bose-Hubbard model, New J. Phys. 14, 065012 (2012)

    work page 2012

  73. [73]

    See Supplementary Material for more details

    work page

  74. [74]

    Peskin and D

    M. Peskin and D. Schroeder, An Introduction To Quan- tum Field Theory (CRC Press, 1995)

    work page 1995

  75. [75]

    Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    M. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model (Cambridge University Press, 2014)

    work page 2014

  76. [76]

    J. H. Busnaina, Z. Shi, A. McDonald, D. Dubyna, I. Nsanzineza, J. S. C. Hung, C. W. S. Chang, A. A. Clerk, and C. M. Wilson, Quantum simulation of the bosonic Kitaev chain, Nat. Comm. 15, 3065 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    J. J. Slim, C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, J. Del Pino, A. Nunnenkamp, and E. Verhagen, Optomechanical re- alization of the bosonic Kitaev chain, Nature 627, 767 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    McDonald and A

    A. McDonald and A. A. Clerk, Exponentially-enhanced quantum sensing with non-Hermitian lattice dynamics, Nat. Comm. 11, 5382 (2020)

    work page 2020

  79. [79]

    L. Bao, B. Qi, and D. Dong, Exponentially enhanced quantum non-Hermitian sensing via optimized coherent drive, Phys. Rev. Appl. 17, 014034 (2022)

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Arandes and E

    O. Arandes and E. J. Bergholtz, Quantum sens- ing with driven-dissipative Su-Schrieffer-Heeger lattices 10.48550/arXiv.2412.13249 (2024)

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.13249 2024

Showing first 80 references.