Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Verification Learning: Make Unsupervised Neuro-Symbolic System Feasible

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.12917 v2 pith:GBYJ3OUV submitted 2025-03-17 cs.AI

Verification Learning: Make Unsupervised Neuro-Symbolic System Feasible

classification cs.AI
keywords learningnesyverificationcurrentlabelsrulestasksdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The current Neuro-Symbolic (NeSy) Learning paradigm suffers from an over-reliance on labeled data, so if we completely disregard labels, it leads to less symbol information, a larger solution space, and more shortcuts-issues that current Nesy systems cannot resolve. This paper introduces a novel learning paradigm, Verification Learning (VL), which addresses this challenge by transforming the label-based reasoning process in Nesy into a label-free verification process. VL achieves excellent learning results solely by relying on unlabeled data and a function that verifies whether the current predictions conform to the rules. We formalize this problem as a Constraint Optimization Problem (COP) and propose a Dynamic Combinatorial Sorting (DCS) algorithm that accelerates the solution by reducing verification attempts, effectively lowering computational costs and introduce a prior alignment method to address potential shortcuts. Our theoretical analysis points out which tasks in Nesy systems can be completed without labels and explains why rules can replace infinite labels for some tasks, while for others the rules have no effect. We validate the proposed framework through several fully unsupervised tasks including addition, sort, match, and chess, each showing significant performance and efficiency improvements.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. BareBones: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Geometric Comprehension in VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    VLMs exhibit a consistent 'Texture Bias Cliff' and fail to comprehend pure geometric shapes from boundary contours alone in zero-shot settings.

  2. BareBones: Benchmarking Zero-Shot Geometric Comprehension in VLMs

    cs.CV 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0

    Across 26 VLMs and six silhouette datasets, accuracy collapses under RGB deprivation—a Texture Bias Cliff—showing models rely on texture and priors more than pure shape.