Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Regulating Ai In Financial Services: Legal Frameworks And Compliance Challenges

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.14541 v1 pith:QZ34D2QF submitted 2025-03-17 cs.CY q-fin.GN

classification cs.CYq-fin.GN
keywords financialcomplianceai-drivenalgorithmicarticlechallengesdataframeworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

This article examines the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation in financial services, detailing the legal frameworks and compliance challenges posed by rapid technological adoption. By reviewing current legislation, industry guidelines, and real-world use cases, it highlights how AI-driven processes, from fraud detection to algorithmic trading, offer efficiency gains yet introduce significant risks, including algorithmic bias, data privacy breaches, and lack of transparency in automated decision-making. The study compares regulatory approaches across major jurisdictions such as the European Union, United States, and United Kingdom, identifying both universal concerns, like the need for explainability and robust data protection, and region-specific compliance requirements that impact the implementation of high-risk AI applications. Additionally, it underscores emerging areas of focus, such as liability for AI-driven errors, systemic risks posed by interlinked AI systems, and the ethical considerations of technology-driven financial exclusion. The findings reveal gaps in existing rules and emphasize the necessity for adaptive, technology-neutral policies capable of fostering innovation while safeguarding consumer rights and market integrity. The article concludes by proposing a principled regulatory model that balances flexibility with enforceable standards, advocating closer collaboration between policymakers, financial institutions, and AI developers to ensure a secure, fair, and forward-looking framework for AI in finance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative AI in Financial Institution: A Global Survey of Opportunities, Threats, and Regulation

    cs.CR 2025-04 unverdicted

    A survey of generative AI applications, cyber threats, and regulatory approaches in global finance, with practical recommendations but no new empirical or theoretical contribution.

Pith tools