REVIEW 3 cited by
Exploring Large Language Models for Word Games:Who is the Spy?
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Word games hold significant research value for natural language processing (NLP), game theory, and related fields due to their rule-based and situational nature. This study explores how large language models (LLMs) can be effectively involved in word games and proposes a training-free framework. "Shei Shi Wo Di" or "Who is the Spy" in English, is a classic word game. Using this game as an example, we introduce a Chain-of-Thought (CoT)-based scheduling framework to enable LLMs to achieve excellent performance in tasks such as inferring role words and disguising their identities. We evaluate the framework's performance based on game success rates and the accuracy of the LLM agents' analytical results. Experimental results affirm the framework's effectiveness, demonstrating notable improvements in LLM performance across multiple datasets. This work highlights the potential of LLMs in mastering situational reasoning and social interactions within structured game environments. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ct-wei/Who-is-The-Spy.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
What to Ask Next? Probing the Imaginative Reasoning of LLMs with TurtleSoup Puzzles
TurtleSoup-Bench is a new interactive benchmark showing that LLMs struggle with imaginative reasoning compared to humans.
-
SocialMaze: A Benchmark for Evaluating Social Reasoning in Large Language Models
SocialMaze is a six-task benchmark that claims to evaluate LLM social reasoning along deep reasoning, dynamic interaction, and information uncertainty dimensions.
-
Can LLMs Play \^O \u{A}n Quan Game? A Study of Multi-Step Planning and Decision Making
In 50-game matches, an 8-billion-parameter Llama beat a 70-billion-parameter Llama more often than it lost, while larger models generated longer reasoning traces but not reliably better scores.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.