REVIEW 3 cited by
Gadgets for simulating a non-native $XX$ interaction in quantum annealing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In certain scenarios, quantum annealing can be made more efficient by additional $XX$ interactions. It has been shown that the additional interactions can reduce the scaling of perturbative crossings. In traditional annealing devices these couplings do not exist natively. In this work, we develop two gadgets to achieve this: a three-body gadget that requires a strong $ZZZ$ interaction; and a one-hot gadget that uses only local $X$ drives and two-body $ZZ$ interactions. The gadgets partition the Hilbert space to effectively generate a limited number of $XX$ interactions in the low-energy subspace. We numerically verify that the one-hot gadget can mitigate a perturbative crossing on a toy problem. These gadgets establish new pathways for implementing and exploiting $XX$ interactions, enabling faster and more robust quantum annealing.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Reshaping quantum annealing landscapes with diagonal catalysts
Catalysts built from sign-propagated path patterns reshape the Hamming-distance structure of Ising landscapes and increase near-solution probability in quantum annealing simulations.
-
Non-Perturbative Topological Gadgets for Many-Body Coupling
Domain-wall defects in a qubit chain can non-perturbatively synthesize effective many-body Hamiltonian terms and encoded bit-flip operations using only local three- or five-body physical couplings.
-
Emulating XX catalysts for quantum annealing via self-consistent transverse fields
Measurement-feedback transverse fields reproduce the dynamics of fully-connected transverse-interaction catalysts at large system size, with errors controlled by system size, update interval, and number of measurements.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.