Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Improving Quantization with Post-Training Model Expansion

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17513 v2 pith:JRQ25KVF submitted 2025-03-21 cs.LG cs.AIcs.AR

classification cs.LGcs.AIcs.AR
keywords modelqualityquantizationpost-trainingimprovesizevolumebeen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

The size of a model has been a strong predictor of its quality, as well as its cost. As such, the trade-off between model cost and quality has been well-studied. Post-training optimizations like quantization and pruning have typically focused on reducing the overall volume of pre-trained models to reduce inference costs while maintaining model quality. However, recent advancements have introduced optimization techniques that, interestingly, expand models post-training, increasing model size to improve quality when reducing volume. For instance, to enable 4-bit weight and activation quantization, incoherence processing often necessitates inserting online Hadamard rotations in the compute graph, and preserving highly sensitive weights often calls for additional higher precision computations. However, if application requirements cannot be met, the prevailing solution is to relax quantization constraints. In contrast, we demonstrate post-training model expansion is a viable strategy to improve model quality within a quantization co-design space, and provide theoretical justification. We show it is possible to progressively and selectively expand the size of a pre-trained large language model (LLM) to improve model quality without end-to-end retraining. In particular, when quantizing the weights and activations to 4 bits for Llama3 1B, we reduce the gap to full-precision perplexity by an average of 9% relative to both QuaRot and SpinQuant with only 5% more parameters, which is still a 3.8% reduction in volume relative to a BF16 reference model.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. When Can Depth Replace Precision? A Resource Theory of Quantized Neural Computation

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10 partial

    For a fixed low-bit residual library, the distance to the closed relaxed reachable set is an exact structural floor that pure depth approaches at O(1/D), while write-back arithmetic can reverse the gain and accuracy m...

  2. Gradual Binary Search and Dimension Expansion : A general method for activation quantization in LLMs

    cs.LG 2025-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Gradual Binary Search over per-projection clipping ratios, combined with Hadamard rotations and dimension expansion, enables 3-bit WAKV quantization with better benchmark accuracy than QuaRot.

Pith tools