Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

OmniScience: A Domain-Specialized LLM for Scientific Reasoning and Discovery

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17604 v4 pith:LS7GBZ5O submitted 2025-03-22 cs.AI

OmniScience: A Domain-Specialized LLM for Scientific Reasoning and Discovery

classification cs.AI
keywords omnisciencereasoningknowledgelargemodelsscientificadaptivebattery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential in advancing scientific knowledge and addressing complex challenges. In this work, we introduce OmniScience, a specialized large reasoning model for general science, developed through three key components: (1) domain adaptive pretraining on a carefully curated corpus of scientific literature, (2) instruction tuning on a specialized dataset to guide the model in following domain-specific tasks, and (3) reasoning-based knowledge distillation through fine-tuning to significantly enhance its ability to generate contextually relevant and logically sound responses. We demonstrate the versatility of OmniScience by developing a battery agent that efficiently ranks molecules as potential electrolyte solvents or additives. Comprehensive evaluations reveal that OmniScience is competitive with state-of-the-art large reasoning models on the GPQA Diamond and domain-specific battery benchmarks, while outperforming all public reasoning and non-reasoning models with similar parameter counts. We further demonstrate via ablation experiments that domain adaptive pretraining and reasoning-based knowledge distillation are critical to attain our performance levels, across benchmarks.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Self-Refining Topology Optimization via an LLM-Based Multi-Agent Framework

    cs.MA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    TopOptAgents deploys six LLM agents in self-refining loops to automate the full topology optimization workflow and succeeds on problem classes where single LLMs fail.

  2. RLBoost: Harvesting Preemptible Resources for Cost-Efficient Reinforcement Learning on LLMs

    cs.DC 2025-10 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    RLBoost harvests preemptible GPUs for RL rollout via a hybrid architecture with adaptive offload, pull-based transfer, and token-level migration, delivering 1.51x-1.97x throughput and 28-49% better cost efficiency tha...

  3. Evolving Roles of LLMs in Scientific Innovation: Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator

    cs.DL 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper proposes a four-role framework for LLMs in scientific innovation and reviews methods, benchmarks, and limitations across Assistant, Collaborator, Scientist, and Evaluator roles.