Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey on Mathematical Reasoning and Optimization with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17726 v1 pith:NYAKCQFU submitted 2025-03-22 cs.AI

A Survey on Mathematical Reasoning and Optimization with Large Language Models

classification cs.AI
keywords reasoningllmsoptimizationmathematicallanguagemodelsproblem-solvingsurvey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Mathematical reasoning and optimization are fundamental to artificial intelligence and computational problem-solving. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved AI-driven mathematical reasoning, theorem proving, and optimization techniques. This survey explores the evolution of mathematical problem-solving in AI, from early statistical learning approaches to modern deep learning and transformer-based methodologies. We review the capabilities of pretrained language models and LLMs in performing arithmetic operations, complex reasoning, theorem proving, and structured symbolic computation. A key focus is on how LLMs integrate with optimization and control frameworks, including mixed-integer programming, linear quadratic control, and multi-agent optimization strategies. We examine how LLMs assist in problem formulation, constraint generation, and heuristic search, bridging theoretical reasoning with practical applications. We also discuss enhancement techniques such as Chain-of-Thought reasoning, instruction tuning, and tool-augmented methods that improve LLM's problem-solving performance. Despite their progress, LLMs face challenges in numerical precision, logical consistency, and proof verification. Emerging trends such as hybrid neural-symbolic reasoning, structured prompt engineering, and multi-step self-correction aim to overcome these limitations. Future research should focus on interpretability, integration with domain-specific solvers, and improving the robustness of AI-driven decision-making. This survey offers a comprehensive review of the current landscape and future directions of mathematical reasoning and optimization with LLMs, with applications across engineering, finance, and scientific research.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Attention-Guided Reward for Reinforcement Learning-based Jailbreak against Large Reasoning Models

    cs.AI 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    An attention-guided RL reward combined with diverse persuasion strategies produces higher attack success rates against large reasoning models than prior jailbreak methods.

  2. Rethinking Wireless Communications through Formal Mathematical AI Reasoning

    eess.SP 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Proposes a three-layer framework using formal AI reasoning for verification, derivation, and discovery in wireless communications theory.

  3. Large Language Models for Operations Research: A Comprehensive Survey

    math.OC 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A survey compiling roles, applications, benchmarks, challenges, and future directions for large language models in operations research.