Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Benchmarking Multi-modal Semantic Segmentation under Sensor Failures: Missing and Noisy Modality Robustness

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.18445 v3 pith:ZEPVF5OV submitted 2025-03-24 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords modalityrobustnessmmssmiouundermulti-modalbenchmarkdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Multi-modal semantic segmentation (MMSS) addresses the limitations of single-modality data by integrating complementary information across modalities. Despite notable progress, a significant gap persists between research and real-world deployment due to variability and uncertainty in multi-modal data quality. Robustness has thus become essential for practical MMSS applications. However, the absence of standardized benchmarks for evaluating robustness hinders further advancement. To address this, we first survey existing MMSS literature and categorize representative methods to provide a structured overview. We then introduce a robustness benchmark that evaluates MMSS models under three scenarios: Entire-Missing Modality (EMM), Random-Missing Modality (RMM), and Noisy Modality (NM). From a probabilistic standpoint, we model modality failure under two conditions: (1) all damaged combinations are equally probable; (2) each modality fails independently following a Bernoulli distribution. Based on these, we propose four metrics-$mIoU^{Avg}_{EMM}$, $mIoU^{E}_{EMM}$, $mIoU^{Avg}_{RMM}$, and $mIoU^{E}_{RMM}$-to assess model robustness under EMM and RMM. This work provides the first dedicated benchmark for MMSS robustness, offering new insights and tools to advance the field. Source code is available at https://github.com/Chenfei-Liao/Multi-Modal-Semantic-Segmentation-Robustness-Benchmark.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Do Vision-Language Models Process Conflicting Information Across Modalities?

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language models answer from whichever modality is encoded more saliently in their final-layer representations, and specific attention heads can be manipulated to shift that preference.

  2. BiXFormer: A Robust Framework for Maximizing Modality Effectiveness in Multi-Modal Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A multi-modal semantic segmentation framework that processes RGB and non-RGB sensors separately, matches labels in two stages, and aligns cross-modal queries with a VAE refiner.

  3. Partial CLIP is Enough: Chimera-Seg for Zero-shot Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A partial, frozen CLIP block mounted on a segmentation backbone, plus selective distillation to CLIP's CLS token, improves zero-shot semantic segmentation by about 1 hIoU point on two datasets.

  4. MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A position paper with a case study showing that multimodal LLMs rely on language priors and underuse visual input, together with a research roadmap and calls for balanced training.

  5. EGFormer: Towards Efficient and Generalizable Multimodal Semantic Segmentation

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    EGFormer dynamically scores and drops the least useful sensor modality at each processing stage, cutting parameters by up to 91 percent and GFLOPs by half while keeping segmentation accuracy competitive.

Pith tools