REVIEW 4 cited by
MLLMs are Deeply Affected by Modality Bias
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promising results in integrating diverse modalities such as texts and images. MLLMs are heavily influenced by modality bias, often relying on language while under-utilizing other modalities like visual inputs. This position paper argues that MLLMs are deeply affected by modality bias. Firstly, we diagnose the current state of modality bias, highlighting its manifestations across various tasks. Secondly, we propose a systematic research road-map related to modality bias in MLLMs. Thirdly, we identify key factors of modality bias in MLLMs and offer actionable suggestions for future research to mitigate it. To substantiate these findings, we conduct experiments that demonstrate the influence of each factor: 1. Data Characteristics: Language data is compact and abstract, while visual data is redundant and complex, creating an inherent imbalance in learning dynamics. 2. Imbalanced Backbone Capabilities: The dominance of pretrained language models in MLLMs leads to overreliance on language and neglect of visual information. 3. Training Objectives: Current objectives often fail to promote balanced cross-modal alignment, resulting in shortcut learning biased toward language. These findings highlight the need for balanced training strategies and model architectures to better integrate multiple modalities in MLLMs. We call for interdisciplinary efforts to tackle these challenges and drive innovation in MLLM research. Our work provides a fresh perspective on modality bias in MLLMs and offers insights for developing more robust and generalizable multimodal systems-advancing progress toward Artificial General Intelligence.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Allocation Before Ranking: Decoupled Token Compression for OmniLLMs
MACER decouples cross-modal token-budget allocation from within-modality token ranking and improves accuracy over shared top-K compression in Qwen2.5-Omni and OmniVinci models.
-
Can Large Multimodal Models Actively Recognize Faulty Inputs? A Systematic Evaluation Framework of Their Input Scrutiny Ability
Large multimodal models mostly fail to proactively detect flawed textual premises, and their performance depends on error type and on how they weight text versus images.
-
When Vision Overrides Language: Evaluating and Mitigating Counterfactual Failures in VLAs
VLAs fail most counterfactual instructions because vision shortcuts dominate language; the new LIBERO-CF benchmark quantifies this, and CAG, an inference-time action mixer, improves grounding and success.
-
Omnidirectional Spatial Modeling from Correlated Panoramas
The authors create a cross-frame panoramic VQA benchmark from 3D scene data and show that GRPO fine-tuning of Qwen2.5-VL raises its score on that benchmark.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.