Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ViLBench: A Suite for Vision-Language Process Reward Modeling

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.20271 v1 pith:26NTQANB submitted 2025-03-26 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords rewardmodelsprocessvilbenchvision-languagevllmsmodelbenchmark
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Process-supervised reward models serve as a fine-grained function that provides detailed step-wise feedback to model responses, facilitating effective selection of reasoning trajectories for complex tasks. Despite its advantages, evaluation on PRMs remains less explored, especially in the multimodal domain. To address this gap, this paper first benchmarks current vision large language models (VLLMs) as two types of reward models: output reward models (ORMs) and process reward models (PRMs) on multiple vision-language benchmarks, which reveal that neither ORM nor PRM consistently outperforms across all tasks, and superior VLLMs do not necessarily yield better rewarding performance. To further advance evaluation, we introduce ViLBench, a vision-language benchmark designed to require intensive process reward signals. Notably, OpenAI's GPT-4o with Chain-of-Thought (CoT) achieves only 27.3% accuracy, indicating the benchmark's challenge for current VLLMs. Lastly, we preliminarily showcase a promising pathway towards bridging the gap between general VLLMs and reward models -- by collecting 73.6K vision-language process reward data using an enhanced tree-search algorithm, our 3B model is able to achieve an average improvement of 3.3% over standard CoT and up to 2.5% compared to its untrained counterpart on ViLBench by selecting OpenAI o1's generations. We release the implementations at https://ucsc-vlaa.github.io/ViLBench with our code, model, and data.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. ReRec: Reasoning-Augmented LLM-based Recommendation Assistant via Reinforcement Fine-tuning

    cs.IR 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    ReRec uses reinforcement fine-tuning with dual-graph reward shaping, reasoning-aware advantage estimation, and online curriculum scheduling to improve LLM reasoning and performance in recommendation tasks.

  2. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

    cs.LG 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0 of 10

    The book introduces the origins, mathematical setup, and optimization stages of RLHF including reward modeling, reinforcement learning, rejection sampling, and direct alignment algorithms.

Pith tools