pith. sign in

arxiv: 2503.20457 · v6 · submitted 2025-03-26 · 🧮 math-ph · cond-mat.stat-mech· math.MP

On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph cond-mat.stat-mechmath.MP
keywords Mori projectiongeneralized Langevin equationorthogonal dynamicsVolterra equationsstrongly continuous semigroupsprojection operator formalismfluctuation dissipation theorem
0
0 comments X

The pith

The orthogonal dynamics for Mori projections is defined directly via linear Volterra equations and forms a strongly continuous semigroup generated by QLQ.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper resolves the well-posedness of the orthogonal dynamics in the Nakajima-Mori-Zwanzig formalism for rank-one Mori projections by defining its orbit maps as solutions to linear Volterra equations. From this definition the authors prove that the orthogonal dynamics is a strongly continuous semigroup whose generator is the operator QLQ, and they recover the generalized Langevin equation together with the second fluctuation-dissipation theorem. One route uses the bounded-perturbation theorem; an alternative route replaces the variation-of-constants formula by a limiting process that avoids any differentiability assumption on the fluctuating forces. The entire development applies to any autonomous dynamical system whose time evolution is given by a strongly continuous semigroup on a Hilbert space.

Core claim

The orbit maps for the orthogonal dynamics can be directly defined via solutions of linear Volterra equations. All desired properties of the orthogonal dynamics are then proven directly from this definition. In particular, the orthogonal dynamics is a strongly continuous semigroup generated by QL Q = QLQ, where L is the generator of the time evolution operator, and P=1-Q is the Mori projection operator. The results apply to general autonomous dynamical systems whose time evolution is given by a strongly continuous semigroup.

What carries the argument

The definition of orthogonal-dynamics orbit maps as solutions of linear Volterra equations, from which the semigroup property and the generator QLQ are derived without invoking differentiability of fluctuating forces.

Load-bearing premise

The time evolution of the system must be given by a strongly continuous semigroup on a Hilbert space.

What would settle it

A concrete dynamical system whose evolution is a strongly continuous semigroup on a Hilbert space, yet whose memory kernel obtained from the Volterra-defined orthogonal dynamics differs from the kernel obtained via the bounded-perturbation route, would falsify the claimed equivalence.

read the original abstract

In statistical physics, the Nakajima-Mori-Zwanzig projection operator formalism is used to derive an integro-differential equation for observables in a Hilbert space, the generalized Langevin equation (GLE). This technique relies on the splitting of the dynamics into a projected and an orthogonal part. However, the well-posedness of the abstract Cauchy problem for the orthogonal dynamics remains an open problem. Moreover, it is rarely discussed under which assumptions the Dyson identity, which is used to derive the GLE, holds. In this article, we address this issue for rank-one projections (Mori's projection). For the Mori projection, the orthogonal dynamics is obtained from the bounded perturbation theorem. The variation of constants formula for strongly continuous semigroups then yields the GLE and the second fluctuation dissipation theorem (2FDT). We show that the variation of constants can be replaced by a limiting process in order to give a general proof of the GLE and 2FDT that does not require the differentiability of the fluctuating forces. In addition, we offer an alternative approach that does not require the bounded perturbation theorem. Our starting point is the observation that the GLE and 2FDT uniquely determine the fluctuating forces as well as the memory kernel. Furthermore, the orbit maps for the orthogonal dynamics can be directly defined via solutions of linear Volterra equations. All desired properties of the orthogonal dynamics are then proven directly from this definition. In particular, the orthogonal dynamics is a strongly continuous semigroup generated by $\overline{\mathcal{QL}}\mathcal{Q}=\mathcal{QLQ}$, where $\mathcal{L}$ is the generator of the time evolution operator, and $\mathcal{P}=1-\mathcal{Q}$ is the Mori projection operator. Our results apply to general autonomous dynamical systems whose time evolution is given by a strongly continuous semigroup.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript resolves the well-posedness of the orthogonal dynamics for rank-one Mori projections in the Nakajima-Mori-Zwanzig formalism. For systems whose time evolution is a strongly continuous semigroup on a Hilbert space, the orthogonal dynamics is constructed either via the bounded perturbation theorem (yielding the GLE and 2FDT by variation of constants) or, alternatively, by directly defining its orbit maps as solutions of linear Volterra equations; all semigroup properties, strong continuity, and the generator identification with the closure of QLQ are then proved from this definition. The results require no extra regularity on the fluctuating forces and apply to general autonomous C0-semigroup dynamics.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the paper supplies a self-contained, rigorous foundation for the Mori projection technique that closes an acknowledged gap in the literature. The Volterra-equation route is especially useful because it derives the semigroup property and generator directly from the GLE/2FDT uniqueness without invoking the bounded perturbation theorem or differentiability assumptions, thereby extending the applicability of the formalism to a broad class of autonomous dynamical systems.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Introduction / §2] The abstract states that the results apply to 'general autonomous dynamical systems whose time evolution is given by a strongly continuous semigroup'; the precise statement of this standing hypothesis (including the Hilbert-space setting and the definition of the Mori projection P) should appear explicitly in the introduction or §2.
  2. [Main text (generator identification)] Notation for the closure of QLQ is introduced as 'overline{QL}Q = QLQ'; a short remark clarifying whether the domain of the generator is taken to be the domain of L or a suitable core would improve readability.
  3. [Discussion / concluding section] The paper mentions an alternative limiting-process proof that avoids differentiability; a brief comparison table or paragraph contrasting the two routes (bounded perturbation vs. Volterra) would help readers assess the scope of each method.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript, including the accurate summary of our results on the well-posedness of the orthogonal dynamics and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained within C0-semigroup theory

full rationale

The paper defines the orthogonal dynamics orbit maps directly as solutions to linear Volterra equations (or via bounded perturbation + variation of constants) and derives semigroup properties, generator identification, GLE, and 2FDT from that definition plus the standing hypothesis that the underlying dynamics is a strongly continuous semigroup on a Hilbert space. All steps remain inside standard functional-analysis results for C0-semigroups; no parameter fitting, self-referential definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs are present. The construction is independent of the target results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard assumptions of semigroup theory rather than new postulates; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The time evolution is given by a strongly continuous semigroup on a Hilbert space
    Explicitly stated as the setting to which the results apply (final sentence of abstract)
  • domain assumption The projection operator is the rank-one Mori projection
    The paper restricts attention to rank-one projections (Mori's projection) throughout

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5871 in / 1529 out tokens · 122001 ms · 2026-05-22T22:51:06.315184+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    projection operator formalism

    Introduction In statistical physics, the method called “projection operator formalism”, “Mori-Zwanzig formalism” or “Nakajima-Zwanzig-formalism” is a well-established method to reduce the dimension of a dynamical system. (For textbooks see ref. [18, 55, 24], for original texts see ref. [34, 52, 53, 33, 29, 13, 56, 54, 26, 16, 17].) The basic idea of this ...

  2. [2]

    We writec ∗ for the conjugate of a complex numberc

    Semigroup approach Throughout this article, letHbe a complex Hilbert space, and let (., .) denote the scalar product with complex conjugation in its second argument. We writec ∗ for the conjugate of a complex numberc. Let{U(t)} t≥0 be a strongly continuous semigroup on Hsuch that the time evolution for some state vectorx∈His given by the orbit map t→ U(t)...

  3. [3]

    [15, Theorem 4.1] in 2005

    Alternative approach using Volterra equations The following derivation of the GLE and 2FDT by means of the theory of Volterra equations is inspired by the existence proof for the orthogonal dynamics for finite-rank projections within the context of Hamiltonian vector fields given by Givon et al. [15, Theorem 4.1] in 2005. First, we observe that the memory...

  4. [4]

    Let the state space be given by Ω =R n andµbe the Lebesgue measure on (Ω,Σ), where Σ denotes the Lebesgue σ-algebra

    Classical statistical mechanics In this section, we demonstrate how the previous results can be applied to statistical ensembles of (possibly non-Hamiltonian) classical systems. Let the state space be given by Ω =R n andµbe the Lebesgue measure on (Ω,Σ), where Σ denotes the Lebesgue σ-algebra. Letρ∈L 1(µ) be non-negative and normalized. The space of real-...

  5. [5]

    time-dependent

    Non-autonomous systems Finally, we ask whether the GLE also holds for systems that evolve under time- dependent dynamics such as systems subjected to time-dependent external forces or active matter. For a time-dependent flowφ:R 2 ×Ω→Ω, where Ω denotes some configuration space, we haveφ(t, r)◦φ(r, s) =φ(t, s) andφ(t, t) = id Ω, for allt, s, r∈R. IfHis a co...

  6. [6]

    Discussion and Conclusion In general, the scope of validity of the Mori-Zwanzig projection operator technique is a subtle issue. In order to derive the GLE, one typically makes use of the Dyson formula G(t)x=U(t)x− Z t 0 U(t−s)PLG(s)x ds ,(6.1) where{G(t)} t≥0 denotes the evolution operator for the orthogonal dynamics. The main difficulty regarding a rigo...

  7. [7]

    Hence, we emphasize the results by John Ball [3]

    and example 3.11. Hence, we emphasize the results by John Ball [3]. The Dyson formula can be viewed as an application of John Ball’s version of the variation of constants formula [3], cf. sec. 2. This requires thatt→ PLG(t)xis continuous andt→ G(t)xhas to be a weak solution of d dt G(t)x=LG(t)x− PLG(t)x(6.2) in the sense of Ball [3]. This is the case, for...

  8. [8]

    Aliprantis and Kim C

    Charalambos D. Aliprantis and Kim C. Border.Infinite Dimensional Analysis: A Hitchhiker’s Guide. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2006

  9. [9]

    Everything is possible for the domain intersection.Advances in Mathematics, 374:107383, 2020

    Yury Arlinski˘ ı and Christiane Tretter. Everything is possible for the domain intersection.Advances in Mathematics, 374:107383, 2020

  10. [10]

    J. M. Ball. Shorter notes: Strongly continuous semigroups, weak solutions, and the variation of constants formula.Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 63(2):370–373, 1977

  11. [11]

    Springer New York, New York, NY, 2011

    Haim Brezis.Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2011

  12. [12]

    T. A. Burton.Volterra Integral and Differential Equations, volume 202 ofMathematics in Science and Engineering. Elsevier, 2005

  13. [13]

    Optimal prediction and the mori–zwanzig representation of irreversible processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7):2968–2973, 2000

    Alexandre J Chorin, Ole H Hald, and Raz Kupferman. Optimal prediction and the mori–zwanzig representation of irreversible processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(7):2968–2973, 2000

  14. [14]

    D. L. Cohn.Measure Theory. Birkh¨ auser New York, NY, 2013

  15. [15]

    E. B. Davies. Semigroup growth bounds.Journal of Operator Theory, 53(2):225–249, 2005

  16. [16]

    Graduate Texts in Mathematics

    Klaus-Jochen Engel and Rainer Nagel.One-Parameter Semigroups for Linear Evolution Equations. Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer New York, 2000. eBook 06 April 2006

  17. [17]

    Evans and G.P

    Denis J. Evans and G.P. Morriss. Equilibrium time correlation functions under gaussian isothermal dynamics.Chemical Physics, 87(3):451–454, 1984

  18. [18]

    Evans.Partial differential equations

    Lawrence C. Evans.Partial differential equations. American Mathematical Society, 1997

  19. [19]

    Folland.Real Analysis - Modern Techniques and Their Applications - Second Edition

    Gerald B. Folland.Real Analysis - Modern Techniques and Their Applications - Second Edition. John Whiley and Sons, 1999

  20. [20]

    Derivation of the stationary generalized langevin equation.Journal of Physics A: General Physics, 4(4):477, jul 1971

    Y Fukui and T Morita. Derivation of the stationary generalized langevin equation.Journal of Physics A: General Physics, 4(4):477, jul 1971

  21. [21]

    Springer Cham, 2023

    Matteo Gallone, Alessandro Michelangeli, and Sergio Albeverio.Self-adjoint extension schemes and modern applications to quantum Hamiltonians. Springer Cham, 2023

  22. [22]

    Dror Givon, Raz Kupferman, and Ole H. Hald. Existence proof for orthogonal dynamics and the mori-zwanzig formalism.Israel Journal of Mathematics, 145(1):221–241, Dec 2005

  23. [23]

    H. Grabert. Microdynamics and equations of motion for macrovariables.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B Condensed Matter, 27(1):95–99, Mar 1977

  24. [24]

    Nonlinear transport and dynamics of fluctuations.Journal of Statistical Physics, 19(5):479–497, Nov 1978

    Hermann Grabert. Nonlinear transport and dynamics of fluctuations.Journal of Statistical Physics, 19(5):479–497, Nov 1978. On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique35

  25. [25]

    Springer, 2006

    Hermann Grabert.Projection operator techniques in nonequilibrium statistical mechanics, volume 95. Springer, 2006

  26. [26]

    Gr¨ une and O

    L. Gr¨ une and O. Junge.Gew¨ ohnliche Differentialgleichungen. Springer Spektrum Wiesbaden, 2016

  27. [27]

    Hall.Quantum Theory for Mathematicians

    Brian C. Hall.Quantum Theory for Mathematicians. Springer New York, New York, NY, 2013

  28. [28]

    Mori–zwanzig formalism as a practical computational tool.Faraday discussions, 144:301–322, 2010

    Carmen Hij´ on, Pep Espa˜ nol, Eric Vanden-Eijnden, and Rafael Delgado-Buscalioni. Mori–zwanzig formalism as a practical computational tool.Faraday discussions, 144:301–322, 2010

  29. [29]

    Hille and R.S

    E. Hille and R.S. Phillips.Functional Analysis and Semi-groups. American Mathematical Society: Colloquium publications. American Mathematical Society, 1957

  30. [30]

    B. L. Holian and D. J. Evans. Classical response theory in the heisenberg picture.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 83(7):3560–3566, 10 1985

  31. [31]

    ANU Press, 2007

    Denis J Evans and Gary P Morriss.Statistical mechanics of nonequilbrium liquids. ANU Press, 2007

  32. [32]

    Derivation of the generalized langevin equation in nonstationary environments.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(11), 2011

    Shinnosuke Kawai and Tamiki Komatsuzaki. Derivation of the generalized langevin equation in nonstationary environments.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 134(11), 2011

  33. [33]

    Simple derivations of generalized linear and nonlinear langevin equations.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General, 6(9):1289, sep 1973

    K Kawasaki. Simple derivations of generalized linear and nonlinear langevin equations.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical, Nuclear and General, 6(9):1289, sep 1973

  34. [34]

    Klenke.Probability Theory

    A. Klenke.Probability Theory. Springer Cham, 2020

  35. [35]

    B. O. Koopman. Hamiltonian systems and transformation in hilbert space.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 17(5):315–318, 1931

  36. [36]

    The fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Reports on progress in physics, 29(1):255, 1966

    Ryogo Kubo. The fluctuation-dissipation theorem.Reports on progress in physics, 29(1):255, 1966

  37. [37]

    Generalized langevin equation for nonequilibrium systems.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 299(3-4):412– 426, 2001

    MG McPhie, PJ Daivis, Ian K Snook, J Ennis, and DJ Evans. Generalized langevin equation for nonequilibrium systems.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 299(3-4):412– 426, 2001

  38. [38]

    On the non-stationary generalized Langevin equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 147(21):214110, 12 2017

    Hugues Meyer, Thomas Voigtmann, and Tanja Schilling. On the non-stationary generalized Langevin equation.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 147(21):214110, 12 2017

  39. [39]

    On the dynamics of reaction coordinates in classical, time-dependent, many-body processes.The Journal of chemical physics, 150(17), 2019

    Hugues Meyer, Thomas Voigtmann, and Tanja Schilling. On the dynamics of reaction coordinates in classical, time-dependent, many-body processes.The Journal of chemical physics, 150(17), 2019

  40. [40]

    Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion.Progress of theoretical physics, 33(3):423–455, 1965

    Hazime Mori. Transport, collective motion, and brownian motion.Progress of theoretical physics, 33(3):423–455, 1965

  41. [41]

    On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 20(6):948–959, 12 1958

    Sadao Nakajima. On quantum theory of transport phenomena: Steady diffusion.Progress of Theoretical Physics, 20(6):948–959, 12 1958

  42. [42]

    Pazy.Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations

    A. Pazy.Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations. Applied Mathematical Sciences. Springer New York, 1983

  43. [43]

    Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 2014

    J¨ urgen P¨ oschel.Etwas mehr Analysis: Eine Einf¨ uhrung in die mehrdimensionale Analysis. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 2014

  44. [44]

    Reed and B

    M. Reed and B. Simon.I: Functional Analysis. Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics. Academic Press, revised and enlarged edition edition, 1980

  45. [45]

    Rudin.Principles of Mathematical Analysis

    W. Rudin.Principles of Mathematical Analysis. International series in pure and applied mathematics. McGraw-Hill, 1964

  46. [46]

    Rudin.Functional Analysis

    W. Rudin.Functional Analysis. McGraw-Hill, tmh edition edition, 1974

  47. [47]

    McGraw-Hill, 1987

    Walter Rudin.Real and Complex Analysis. McGraw-Hill, 1987

  48. [48]

    Coarse-grained modelling out of equilibrium.Physics Reports, 972:1–45, 2022

    Tanja Schilling. Coarse-grained modelling out of equilibrium.Physics Reports, 972:1–45, 2022

  49. [49]

    Elsevier, 2006

    Ian Snook.The Langevin and generalised Langevin approach to the dynamics of atomic, polymeric and colloidal systems. Elsevier, 2006

  50. [50]

    M. H. Stone. On one-parameter unitary groups in hilbert space.Annals of Mathematics, 33(3):643–648, 1932

  51. [51]

    Michael Te Vrugt and Raphael Wittkowski. Mori-zwanzig projection operator formalism for far- from-equilibrium systems with time-dependent hamiltonians.Physical Review E, 99(6):062118, On the generalized Langevin equation and the Mori projection operator technique36 2019

  52. [52]

    Projection operators in statistical mechanics: a pedagogical approach.European Journal of Physics, 41(4):045101, 2020

    Michael te Vrugt and Raphael Wittkowski. Projection operators in statistical mechanics: a pedagogical approach.European Journal of Physics, 41(4):045101, 2020

  53. [53]

    J. v. Neumann. ¨Uber Einen Satz Von Herrn M. H. Stone.Annals of Mathematics, 33(3):567–573, 1932

  54. [54]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

    Jan van Neerven.The Adjoint of a Semigroup of Linear Operators. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1992

  55. [55]

    Springer New York, NY, 1980

    Joachim Weidmann.Linear operators in Hilbert spaces. Springer New York, NY, 1980

  56. [56]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2018

    Dirk Werner.Funktionalanalysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2018

  57. [57]

    Generalized Langevin dynamics simulation with non-stationary memory kernels: How to make noise.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(19):194107, 11 2022

    Christoph Widder, Fabian Koch, and Tanja Schilling. Generalized Langevin dynamics simulation with non-stationary memory kernels: How to make noise.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 157(19):194107, 11 2022

  58. [58]

    Dominy, and Daniele Venturi

    Yuanran Zhu, Jason M. Dominy, and Daniele Venturi. On the estimation of the Mori-Zwanzig memory integral.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(10):103501, 09 2018

  59. [59]

    Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 33(5):1338–1341, 1960

    Robert Zwanzig. Ensemble method in the theory of irreversibility.The Journal of Chemical Physics, 33(5):1338–1341, 1960

  60. [60]

    Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics.Phys

    Robert Zwanzig. Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics.Phys. Rev., 124:983–992, Nov 1961

  61. [61]

    Nonlinear generalized langevin equations.Journal of Statistical Physics, 9(3):215–220, Nov 1973

    Robert Zwanzig. Nonlinear generalized langevin equations.Journal of Statistical Physics, 9(3):215–220, Nov 1973

  62. [62]

    Oxford University Press, 2001

    Robert Zwanzig.Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics. Oxford University Press, 2001

  63. [63]

    Robert Zwanzig, K. S. J. Nordholm, and W. C. Mitchell. Memory effects in irreversible thermodynamics: Corrected derivation of transport equations.Phys. Rev. A, 5:2680–2682, Jun 1972