Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Shape Modeling of Longitudinal Medical Images: From Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping to Deep Learning

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 27 Mar 2025

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We discuss the synergistic combinations of existing technologies and potential directions for future research, underscoring key deficiencies in the current research landscape.

how it is stated · asserted 0.85 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2503.21489 (version 2)
Pith IDNZTIEBZO, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAmir A. Zadpoor, Edwin Tay, Nazli T\"umer. "Shape Modeling of Longitudinal Medical Images: From Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping to Deep Learning." arXiv:2503.21489 (2025). https://pith.science/paper/NZTIEBZO
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,498 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.02 · states limitation 0.14 · human participants 0.30 · controlled comparison 0.03 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.02 · compares with prior results 0.06 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Living biological tissue is a complex system, constantly growing and changing in response to external and internal stimuli. These processes lead to remarkable and intricate changes in shape. Modeling and understanding both natural and pathological (or abnormal) changes in the shape of anatomical structures is highly relevant, with applications in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic healthcare. Nevertheless, modeling the longitudinal shape change of biological tissue is a non-trivial task due to its inherent nonlinear nature. In this review, we highlight several existing methodologies and tools for modeling longitudinal shape change (i.e., spatiotemporal shape modeling). These methods range from diffeomorphic metric mapping to deep-learning based approaches (e.g., autoencoders, generative networks, recurrent neural networks, etc.). We discuss the synergistic combinations of existing technologies and potential directions for future research, underscoring key deficiencies in the current research landscape.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Living biological tissue is a complex system, constantly growing and changing in response to external and internal stimuli. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 These processes lead to remarkable and intricate changes in shape. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 Modeling and understanding both natural and pathological (or abnormal) changes in the shape of anatomical structures is highly relevant, with applications in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic healthcare. background 1.00 0.04 0.06 asserted 1.00
s3 Nevertheless, modeling the longitudinal shape change of biological tissue is a non-trivial task due to its inherent nonlinear nature. background 0.79 0.06 0.04 asserted 1.00
s4 In this review, we highlight several existing methodologies and tools for modeling longitudinal shape change (i.e., spatiotemporal shape modeling). contribution 0.97 0.23 0.07 asserted 0.99
s5 These methods range from diffeomorphic metric mapping to deep-learning based approaches (e.g., autoencoders, generative networks, recurrent neural networks, etc.). contribution 0.55 0.05 0.06 asserted 0.98
s6 We discuss the synergistic combinations of existing technologies and potential directions for future research, underscoring key deficiencies in the current research landscape. future work 0.59 0.48 0.34 asserted 0.85

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: review 1.00 · evidence from literature 0.99.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Living biological tissue is a complex system, constantly growing and changing in response to external and internal stimuli. These processes lead to remarkable and intricate changes in shape. Modeling and understanding both natural and pathological (or abnormal) changes in the shape of anatomical structures is highly relevant, with applications in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic healthcare. Nevertheless, modeling the longitudinal shape change of biological tissue is a non-trivial task due to its inherent nonlinear nature. In this review, we highlight several existing methodologies and tools for modeling longitudinal shape change (i.e., spatiotemporal shape modeling). These methods range from diffeomorphic metric mapping to deep-learning based approaches (e.g., autoencoders, generative networks, recurrent neural networks, etc.). We discuss the synergistic combinations of existing technologies and potential directions for future research, underscoring key deficiencies in the current research landscape.

Human review
How the literature uses it

What this paper does with the arXiv papers it cites

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

What it cites · 23 sentences without a confident label

Cites as support 1 paper
Cites as background 6 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.