Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

How Difficulty-Aware Staged Reinforcement Learning Enhances LLMs' Reasoning Capabilities: A Preliminary Experimental Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.00829 v1 pith:AWFB5HYH submitted 2025-04-01 cs.CL

How Difficulty-Aware Staged Reinforcement Learning Enhances LLMs' Reasoning Capabilities: A Preliminary Experimental Study

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningcapabilitiesllmsmodelsstagedtrainingbenchmarkdifficulty-aware
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) with efficiency and scalability remains a fundamental challenge in artificial intelligence research. This paper presents a rigorous experimental investigation into how difficulty-aware staged reinforcement learning (RL) strategies can substantially improve LLM reasoning performance. Through systematic analysis, we demonstrate that strategically selecting training data according to well-defined difficulty levels markedly enhances RL optimization. Moreover, we introduce a staged training methodology, progressively exposing models to increasingly challenging tasks, further amplifying reasoning capabilities. Our findings reveal significant cross-domain benefits when simultaneously training models on mathematical reasoning and code generation tasks. Notably, our proposed approach enables a 1.5B parameter model to achieve an accuracy of 42.3\% on the AIME-2024 benchmark, 89.5\% on the MATH-500 benchmark. These results underscore the efficacy of our method in advancing the reasoning proficiency of LLMs. We will open-source our datasets on GitHub and Hugging Face.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Adaptive Loss Balancing for Noise-Robust GRPO in Generative Recommendation

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    AdaGRPO gates GRPO reinforcement learning with supervised NLL using per-sample binary clips based on policy difficulty and reward discriminability, raising HR@10 from 11.01% to 12.18% while keeping hallucination below...

  2. Clipping Bottleneck: Stabilizing RLVR via Stochastic Recovery of Near-Boundary Signals

    cs.LG 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Proposes Near-boundary Stochastic Rescue (NSR) as a stochastic modification to clipping in RLVR that recovers near-boundary signals and yields gains over baselines like DAPO and GSPO.