pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.01462 · v2 · submitted 2025-04-02 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas

Characterization of the chaotic phase in the tilted Bose-Hubbard model

Pilar Mart\'in Clavero , Alberto Rodr\'iguez This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 22:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords Bose-Hubbard modelquantum chaostiltlevel statisticsparticipation ratiocold atomsmany-body localization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A moderate tilt enlarges the chaotic phase of the Bose-Hubbard model relative to the untilted case.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper maps the region of chaotic eigenstates in the tilted Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian as a function of energy, tilt, and interaction strength. It shows that a moderate added tilt expands the chaotic regime compared with the zero-tilt Bose-Hubbard model. The mapping is performed with standard spectral and eigenstate diagnostics and is presented from the viewpoint of a homogeneous density profile that matches typical cold-atom setups. The resulting phase diagram supplies concrete boundaries that experiments can target.

Core claim

The chaotic phase of the bare Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian is enlarged by a moderate tilt; the boundaries of this enhanced chaotic regime are located by level-spacing statistics and eigenstate participation ratios, and the scaling of the regime is tracked from a homogeneous density configuration.

What carries the argument

Tilted Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian, diagnosed by nearest-neighbor level-spacing ratios and eigenstate participation ratios.

If this is right

  • Moderate tilt increases the energy window over which chaotic eigenstates appear.
  • The chaotic regime can be reached at weaker interactions when a suitable tilt is added.
  • The phase boundaries remain visible when the system is prepared in a homogeneous density state.
  • The tilt-induced expansion of chaos supplies a tunable knob for controlling ergodicity in optical-lattice experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the enhancement persists in the thermodynamic limit, tilt could serve as a practical control parameter for driving thermalization in interacting boson systems.
  • The same diagnostics could be applied to related tilted models such as the Fermi-Hubbard chain to test whether the enhancement is generic.
  • Experiments could directly measure the participation-ratio drop by preparing states at the reported tilt values and probing their spatial extent.

Load-bearing premise

Level-spacing statistics and participation ratios are enough to locate the chaotic phase boundary in the finite systems studied.

What would settle it

A calculation on larger lattices showing that the level-spacing ratio in the claimed enhanced-tilt region remains closer to Poisson than to GOE statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.01462 by Alberto Rodr\'iguez, Pilar Mart\'in Clavero.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Pictorial representation of the integrable limits and the chaotic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Evolution of the chaotic phase for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Numerical distributions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Parametric width of the chaotic phase for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of the chaotic phase for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Chaotic phase for the homogeneous Fock state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Development of the chaotic phase at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The chaotic phase of the tilted Bose-Hubbard model is identified as a function of energy, tilt strength and particle interaction, from the eigenstate structure and the statistical features of the energy spectrum. Our analysis reveals that the chaotic phase of the bare Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian can actually be enhanced by the presence of a moderate tilt. We further unveil the development and scaling of the chaotic regime from the perspective of a homogeneous density configuration typically used in cold atom experiments, providing a valuable phase diagram for future theoretical and experimental studies of this system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript characterizes the chaotic phase in the tilted Bose-Hubbard model as a function of energy, tilt strength, and particle interaction, using eigenstate structure and statistical features of the energy spectrum. It claims that moderate tilt enhances the chaotic phase relative to the bare Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian and supplies a phase diagram from the perspective of homogeneous density configurations relevant to cold-atom experiments.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the result would be of interest to the quantum chaos and ultracold-atoms communities by suggesting a counterintuitive enhancement of many-body chaos via tilt and by providing a practical phase diagram for experiments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The claim that moderate tilt enlarges the chaotic region rests on nearest-neighbor level-spacing ratios and eigenstate participation ratios (as described in the abstract). In finite-size many-body systems these diagnostics can register intermediate statistics arising from crossovers or residual integrability remnants rather than true Wigner-Dyson level repulsion; the abstract gives no indication that spectral form factor, out-of-time-order correlators, or Thouless-time scaling were used to corroborate the phase boundary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the major comment below, revising the manuscript where appropriate while defending the core analysis on substantive grounds.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that moderate tilt enlarges the chaotic region rests on nearest-neighbor level-spacing ratios and eigenstate participation ratios (as described in the abstract). In finite-size many-body systems these diagnostics can register intermediate statistics arising from crossovers or residual integrability remnants rather than true Wigner-Dyson level repulsion; the abstract gives no indication that spectral form factor, out-of-time-order correlators, or Thouless-time scaling were used to corroborate the phase boundary.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract should explicitly name the diagnostics employed and have revised it accordingly to state that the chaotic phase is identified via nearest-neighbor level-spacing ratios and eigenstate participation ratios. On the broader concern, these measures are standard for mapping many-body chaos in the literature; our manuscript further supports their interpretation by presenting finite-size scaling that shows convergence toward Wigner-Dyson statistics inside the identified region, thereby reducing the likelihood that the reported enhancement is merely an intermediate crossover. We acknowledge that spectral form factor, OTOCs, or Thouless-time analysis would constitute stronger corroboration, but such calculations lie outside the scope of the present work, whose goal is a practical phase diagram based on accessible diagnostics for cold-atom experiments. A new paragraph has been added to the discussion section addressing the distinction from residual integrability effects. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical diagnostics on computed spectra

full rationale

The paper characterizes the chaotic phase via direct diagonalization of the tilted Bose-Hubbard Hamiltonian, followed by computation of level-spacing statistics and eigenstate participation ratios on the resulting eigenvalues and eigenvectors. No parameters are fitted to a data subset and then invoked as predictions of related quantities; no uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are imported via self-citation; and the central claim (tilt-enhanced chaos relative to the untilted case) follows from explicit comparison of these independently computed indicators across parameter values. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work relies on standard many-body quantum chaos diagnostics whose validity is taken as given from prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5610 in / 1155 out tokens · 81136 ms · 2026-05-22T22:21:00.508684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    libraries, which permit an efficient parallelization of the numerical task to be run on High-Performance Computing facilities. A proper strategy using a combination of MPI and OpenMP [106] optimize the computational resources needed to obtain a few hundred eigensates in the excitation spectrum of our model for systems with a Hilbert space dimension of D ≲...

    work page

  2. [2]

    provides a comparison between the model’s and RMT distribution for the level spacing ratio, 𝐾 𝐿(𝑃, 𝑃GOE) = ∫ 1 0 d𝑟 𝑃 (𝑟) ln 𝑃(𝑟) 𝑃GOE(𝑟) , (10) and is here estimated by considering the discretized version of the latter equation for the finite differenceΔ𝑟 = 0.04. We monitor the evolution of the chaotic phase emerging in the excitation spectrum by tuning𝐽...

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    J. M. Deutsch, Phys. Rev. A43, 2046 (1991)

    work page 2046

  4. [4]

    Rigol, V

    M. Rigol, V. Dunjko, and M. Olshanii, Nature452, 854 (2008)

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    Srednicki, J

    M. Srednicki, J. Phys. A. Math. Gen.29, L75 (1996)

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Srednicki, J

    M. Srednicki, J. Phys. A. Math. Gen.32, 1163 (1999)

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    57,165201(2024)

    H.A.Weidenmüller,J.Phys.AMath.Theor. 57,165201(2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Haake, S

    F. Haake, S. Gnutzmann, and M. Kuś,Quantum Signatures of Chaos, edited by H. Haken, Springer Series in Synergetics (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2018)

    work page 2018

  9. [9]

    F. M. Izrailev, Phys. Rep.196, 299 (1990)

    work page 1990

  10. [10]

    D’Alessio, Y

    L. D’Alessio, Y. Kafri, A. Polkovnikov, and M. Rigol, Adv. Phys. 65, 239 (2016)

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    Borgonovi, F

    F. Borgonovi, F. M. Izrailev, L. F. Santos, and V. G. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rep.626, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    D. A. Abanin, E. Altman, I. Bloch, and M. Serbyn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 021001 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Sierant, M

    P. Sierant, M. Lewenstein, A. Scardicchio, L. Vidmar, and J. Zakrzewski, Rep. Prog. Phys.88, 026502 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Berke, E

    C. Berke, E. Varvelis, S. Trebst, A. Altland, and D. P. DiVin- cenzo, Nat. Commun.13, 2495 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Chaotic fluctuations in a universal set of transmon qubit gates

    D. Basilewitsch, S.-D. Börner, C. Berke, A. Altland, S. Trebst, and C. P. Koch, (2023), arXiv:2311.14592

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Börner, C

    S.-D. Börner, C. Berke, D. P. DiVincenzo, S. Trebst, and A. Altland, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033128 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkelstein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brandão, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Nature 613, 468 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    D. K. Mark, J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, M. Endres, and S. Choi, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 110601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    Kinoshita, T

    T. Kinoshita, T. Wenger, and D. S. Weiss, Nature440, 900 (2006)

    work page 2006

  20. [20]

    Trotzky, Y.-A

    S. Trotzky, Y.-A. Chen, A. Flesch, I. P. McCulloch, U. Scholl- wöck, J. Eisert, and I. Bloch, Nat. Phys.8, 325 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Cheneau, P

    M. Cheneau, P. Barmettler, D. Poletti, M. Endres, P. Schauß, T.Fukuhara,C.Gross,I.Bloch,C.Kollath,andS.Kuhr,Nature 481, 484 (2012)

    work page 2012

  22. [22]

    Gring, M

    M. Gring, M. Kuhnert, T. Langen, T. Kitagawa, B. Rauer, M.Schreitl,I.Mazets,D.AduSmith,E.Demler,andJ.Schmied- mayer, Science337, 1318 (2012)

    work page 2012

  23. [23]

    J. P. Ronzheimer, M. Schreiber, S. Braun, S. S. Hodgman, S. Langer, I. P. McCulloch, F. Heidrich-Meisner, I. Bloch, and U. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 205301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  24. [24]

    Langen, R

    T. Langen, R. Geiger, M. Kuhnert, B. Rauer, and J. Schmied- mayer, Nat. Phys.9, 640 (2013)

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Meinert, M

    F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, E. Kirilov, K. Lauber, P. Weinmann, M. Gröbner, A. J. Daley, and H.-C. Nägerl, Science344, 1259 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Rohringer, I

    T.Langen,S.Erne,R.Geiger,B.Rauer,T.Schweigler,M.Kuh- nert, W. Rohringer, I. E. Mazets, T. Gasenzer, and J. Schmied- mayer, Science348, 207 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    A. M. Kaufman, M. E. Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, P. M. Preiss, and M. Greiner, Science353, 794 (2016)

    work page 2016

  28. [28]

    J.-Y. Choi, S. Hild, J. Zeiher, P. Schauß, A. Rubio-Abadal, T. Yefsah, V. Khemani, D. A. Huse, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Science 352, 1547 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Schneider, Phys

    P.Bordia,H.P.Lüschen,S.S.Hodgman,M.Schreiber,I.Bloch, and U. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 140401 (2016)

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Lukin, M

    A. Lukin, M. Rispoli, R. Schittko, M. E. Tai, A. M. Kaufman, S. Choi, V. Khemani, J. Léonard, and M. Greiner, Science364, 256 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Greiner, Nature573, 385 (2019)

    M.Rispoli,A.Lukin,R.Schittko,S.Kim,M.E.Tai,J.Léonard, and M. Greiner, Nature573, 385 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Rubio-Abadal, J.-Y

    A. Rubio-Abadal, J.-Y. Choi, J. Zeiher, S. Hollerith, J. Rui, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Phys. Rev. X9, 041014 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    127,150504(2021)

    A.Bohrdt, S.Kim, A.Lukin, M.Rispoli, R.Schittko, M.Knap, M.Greiner,andJ.Léonard,Phys.Rev.Lett. 127,150504(2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Takasu, T

    Y. Takasu, T. Yagami, H. Asaka, Y. Fukushima, K. Nagao, S. Goto, I. Danshita, and Y. Takahashi, Sci. Adv.6, eaba9255 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Léonard, S

    J. Léonard, S. Kim, M. Rispoli, A. Lukin, R. Schittko, J. Kwan, E. Demler, D. Sels, and M. Greiner, Nat. Phys.19, 481 (2023)

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Y. Le, Y. Zhang, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Rigol, and D. S. Weiss, Nature 618, 494 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    M. P. Fisher, P. B. Weichman, G. Grinstein, and D. S. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B40, 546 (1989)

    work page 1989

  38. [38]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, V. Ahufinger, B. Damski, A. Sen, and U. Sen, Adv. Phys.56, 243 (2007)

    work page 2007

  39. [39]

    Bloch, J

    I. Bloch, J. Dalibard, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 885 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    M. A. Cazalilla, R. Citro, T. Giamarchi, E. Orignac, and M. Rigol, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1405 (2011)

    work page 2011

  41. [41]

    K. V. Krutitsky, Phys. Rep.607, 1 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Ben Dahan, E

    M. Ben Dahan, E. Peik, J. Reichel, Y. Castin, and C. Salomon, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4508 (1996)

    work page 1996

  43. [43]

    E.Peik,M.BenDahan,I.Bouchoule,Y.Castin,andC.Salomon, Phys. Rev. A55, 2989 (1997)

    work page 1997

  44. [44]

    E.Peik,M.BenDahan,I.Bouchoule,Y.Castin,andC.Salomon, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt.65, 685 (1997). 10

    work page 1997

  45. [45]

    S. R. Wilkinson, C. F. Bharucha, K. W. Madison, Q. Niu, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4512 (1996)

    work page 1996

  46. [46]

    Sundaram, and M

    C.F.Bharucha, K.W.Madison, P.R.Morrow, S.R.Wilkinson, B. Sundaram, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. A55, R857 (1997)

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    Madison, C

    K. Madison, C. Bharucha, P. Morrow, S. Wilkinson, Q. Niu, B. Sundaram, and M. Raizen, Appl. Phys. B Lasers Opt.65, 693 (1997)

    work page 1997

  48. [48]

    K. W. Madison, M. C. Fischer, and M. G. Raizen, Phys. Rev. A 60, R1767 (1999)

    work page 1999

  49. [49]

    B. P. Anderson and M. A. Kasevich, Science282, 1686 (1998)

    work page 1998

  50. [50]

    Morsch, J

    O. Morsch, J. H. Müller, M. Cristiani, D. Ciampini, and E. Ari- mondo, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 140402 (2001)

    work page 2001

  51. [51]

    Cristiani, O

    M. Cristiani, O. Morsch, J. H. Müller, D. Ciampini, and E. Ari- mondo, Phys. Rev. A65, 063612 (2002)

    work page 2002

  52. [52]

    Ferrari, N

    G. Ferrari, N. Poli, F. Sorrentino, and G. M. Tino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 060402 (2006)

    work page 2006

  53. [53]

    Phys.18, 102001 (2016)

    H.Keßler,J.Klinder,B.P.Venkatesh,C.Georges,andA.Hem- merich, New J. Phys.18, 102001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Z. A. Geiger, K. M. Fujiwara, K. Singh, R. Senaratne, S. V. Rajagopal,M.Lipatov,T.Shimasaki,R.Driben,V.V.Konotop, T. Meier, and D. M. Weld, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 213201 (2018)

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    L. Masi, T. Petrucciani, G. Ferioli, G. Semeghini, G. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and M. Fattori, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 020601 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [56]

    Modugno, M

    M.Fattori,C.D’Errico,G.Roati,M.Zaccanti,M.Jona-Lasinio, M. Modugno, M. Inguscio, and G. Modugno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080405 (2008)

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Gustavsson, E

    M. Gustavsson, E. Haller, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, G. Rojas- Kopeinig, and H.-C. Nägerl, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 080404 (2008)

    work page 2008

  58. [58]

    Gustavsson, E

    M. Gustavsson, E. Haller, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, R. Hart, A. J. Daley, and H.-C. Nägerl, New J. Phys.12, 065029 (2010)

    work page 2010

  59. [59]

    Lahini, R

    P.M.Preiss,R.Ma,M.E.Tai,A.Lukin,M.Rispoli,P.Zupancic, Y. Lahini, R. Islam, and M. Greiner, Science347, 1229 (2015)

    work page 2015

  60. [60]

    Meinert, M

    F. Meinert, M. J. Mark, E. Kirilov, K. Lauber, P. Weinmann, M. Gröbner, and H.-C. Nägerl, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 193003 (2014)

    work page 2014

  61. [61]

    V. V. Ivanov, A. Alberti, M. Schioppo, G. Ferrari, M. Artoni, M. L. Chiofalo, and G. M. Tino, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 043602 (2008)

    work page 2008

  62. [62]

    C. Sias, H. Lignier, Y. P. Singh, A. Zenesini, D. Ciampini, O. Morsch, and E. Arimondo, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 040404 (2008)

    work page 2008

  63. [63]

    Alberti, V

    A. Alberti, V. V. Ivanov, G. M. Tino, and G. Ferrari, Nat. Phys. 5, 547 (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [64]

    Haller, R

    E. Haller, R. Hart, M. J. Mark, J. G. Danzl, L. Reichsöllner, and H.-C. Nägerl, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 200403 (2010)

    work page 2010

  65. [65]

    Alberti, G

    A. Alberti, G. Ferrari, V. V. Ivanov, M. L. Chiofalo, and G. M. Tino, New J. Phys.12, 065037 (2010)

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    R. Ma, M. E. Tai, P. M. Preiss, W. S. Bakr, J. Simon, and M. Greiner, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 095301 (2011)

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    C. J. Fujiwara, K. Singh, Z. A. Geiger, R. Senaratne, S. V. Rajagopal, M. Lipatov, and D. M. Weld, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 010402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner, Science386, 1055 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [69]

    91,253002 (2003)

    A.BuchleitnerandA.R.Kolovsky,Phys.Rev.Lett. 91,253002 (2003)

    work page 2003

  70. [70]

    A. R. Kolovsky and A. Buchleitner, Phys. Rev. E68, 056213 (2003)

    work page 2003

  71. [71]

    A. R. Kolovsky and A. Buchleitner, Europhys. Lett.68, 632 (2004)

    work page 2004

  72. [72]

    A. R. Kolovsky, H. J. Korsch, and E.-M. Graefe, Phys. Rev. A 80, 023617 (2009)

    work page 2009

  73. [73]

    A. R. Kolovsky, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B30, 1630009 (2016)

    work page 2016

  74. [74]

    Pausch,Eigenstate structure and quantum chaos in the Bose- Hubbard Hamiltonian, Phd thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (2022)

    L. Pausch,Eigenstate structure and quantum chaos in the Bose- Hubbard Hamiltonian, Phd thesis, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (2022)

    work page 2022

  75. [75]

    Hartmann, F

    T. Hartmann, F. Keck, H. J. Korsch, and S. Mossmann, New J. Phys. 6, 2 (2004)

    work page 2004

  76. [76]

    Biroli, C

    G. Biroli, C. Kollath, and A. M. Läuchli, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 250401 (2010)

    work page 2010

  77. [77]

    Theory Exp.2010, P08011 (2010)

    C.Kollath,G.Roux,G.Biroli,andA.M.Läuchli,J.Stat.Mech. Theory Exp.2010, P08011 (2010)

    work page 2010

  78. [78]

    Beugeling, R

    W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Phys. Rev. E89, 042112 (2014)

    work page 2014

  79. [79]

    Beugeling, R

    W. Beugeling, R. Moessner, and M. Haque, Phys. Rev. E91, 012144 (2015)

    work page 2015

  80. [80]

    Beugeling, A

    W. Beugeling, A. Andreanov, and M. Haque, J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp.2015, P02002 (2015)

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.