pith. sign in

arxiv: 2311.14592 · v2 · submitted 2023-11-24 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.mes-hall

Chaotic fluctuations in a universal set of transmon qubit gates

Daniel Basilewitsch , Simon-Dominik B\"orner , Christoph Berke , Alexander Altland , Simon Trebst , Christiane P. Koch This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 05:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords transmon qubitschaotic fluctuationsentangling gatesquantum speed limiteigenphasestime evolution operatornonlinear resonators
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fast entangling gates on two transmons develop partial chaotic dynamics in transient regimes when operated near the quantum speed limit.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how nonlinearities in transmon qubits can lead to chaotic fluctuations during fast gate operations that temporarily involve higher energy states. It proposes using the curvatures of instantaneous eigenphases from the time evolution operator to statistically detect which parts of the system are affected by these instabilities. Analysis of a universal set of gates reveals that even with only two transmons, operations close to the quantum speed limit include periods of partial chaos. This matters because such fluctuations could impact the reliability of quantum computations relying on these fast gates. A sympathetic reader would care as it highlights a potential hidden challenge in scaling transmon-based quantum processors.

Core claim

A statistical analysis of the curvatures of instantaneous eigenphases of the time evolution operator identifies the subspace affected by chaotic fluctuations, showing that fast entangling gates operating near the quantum speed limit contain transient regimes of partial chaos for two transmons.

What carries the argument

The curvatures of instantaneous eigenphases of the time evolution operator, used to statistically identify chaotic subspaces.

If this is right

  • Fast gates near the quantum speed limit will exhibit partial chaotic dynamics even in two-transmon systems.
  • The affected subspace can be identified through statistical analysis of eigenphase curvatures.
  • Transient regimes during gate operations are where chaos manifests.
  • Universal sets of transmon gates are subject to these instabilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers of fast quantum gates may need to account for these chaotic periods to maintain gate fidelity.
  • Similar analysis could apply to larger numbers of qubits or different qubit types.
  • Experimental verification might involve measuring phase fluctuations in transmon systems.

Load-bearing premise

The curvatures of instantaneous eigenphases can be used to statistically identify the subspace affected by chaotic fluctuations.

What would settle it

A calculation or experiment showing no partial chaos in the eigenphase curvatures for fast entangling gates near the quantum speed limit would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2311.14592 by Alexander Altland, Christiane P. Koch, Christoph Berke, Daniel Basilewitsch, Simon-Dominik B\"orner, Simon Trebst.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Transmon qubits arise from the quantization of nonlinear resonators, systems that are prone to the buildup of strong, possibly chaotic, fluctuations. Such instabilities will likely affect fast gate operations which involve the transient population of higher excited states outside the computational subspace. Here we show that a statistical analysis of the instantaneous eigenphases of the time evolution operator, in particular of their curvatures, allows for identifying the subspace affected by chaotic fluctuations. Our analysis shows that fast entangling gates, operating at speeds close to the so-called quantum speed limit, contain transient regimes where the dynamics indeed becomes partially chaotic for just two transmons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that a statistical analysis of the curvatures of instantaneous eigenphases of the time-evolution operator can identify subspaces affected by chaotic fluctuations in transmon systems, and that fast entangling gates operating near the quantum speed limit exhibit transient partial chaos even for just two transmons.

Significance. If the curvature-based diagnostic is shown to reliably distinguish chaos from other non-integrable effects such as avoided crossings or anharmonicity, the result would be significant for understanding fidelity limits in high-speed superconducting qubit gates. The work correctly identifies that fast gates transiently populate higher levels, but the diagnostic itself is non-standard and requires explicit validation to support the chaos interpretation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the section introducing the curvature analysis] The central claim rests on interpreting eigenphase curvatures as a chaos identifier, yet the manuscript provides no benchmarking of this statistic against integrable limits, known chaotic driven resonators, or standard diagnostics such as nearest-neighbor spacing distributions or spectral form factors. This is load-bearing for the conclusion of 'partially chaotic' dynamics.
  2. [Results for the two-transmon entangling gates] Without explicit comparison to control cases (e.g., linear resonators or parameter regimes known to be integrable), the reported curvatures could arise from diabatic transitions or anharmonic level repulsion rather than chaotic fluctuations; the two-transmon results therefore do not yet establish the claimed transient chaos.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] Notation for instantaneous eigenphases and their curvatures should be defined with an explicit equation early in the text.
  2. [Discussion] The abstract states the conclusion for 'just two transmons' but the manuscript should clarify whether the same curvature signature appears in larger systems or is an artifact of the two-qubit truncation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report. The two major comments correctly identify that the curvature diagnostic requires additional validation against standard measures and control cases to support the interpretation of transient partial chaos. We address both points below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and the section introducing the curvature analysis] The central claim rests on interpreting eigenphase curvatures as a chaos identifier, yet the manuscript provides no benchmarking of this statistic against integrable limits, known chaotic driven resonators, or standard diagnostics such as nearest-neighbor spacing distributions or spectral form factors. This is load-bearing for the conclusion of 'partially chaotic' dynamics.

    Authors: We agree that explicit benchmarking is needed to establish the curvature statistic as a reliable chaos identifier. The manuscript introduces the curvature analysis as a time-local diagnostic suited to driven transmon systems but does not include direct comparisons to nearest-neighbor spacing distributions or spectral form factors in integrable limits. We will add a new subsection performing these benchmarks on both the two-transmon model and a known chaotic driven resonator, showing that large curvature fluctuations correlate with level repulsion statistics only in the non-integrable regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results for the two-transmon entangling gates] Without explicit comparison to control cases (e.g., linear resonators or parameter regimes known to be integrable), the reported curvatures could arise from diabatic transitions or anharmonic level repulsion rather than chaotic fluctuations; the two-transmon results therefore do not yet establish the claimed transient chaos.

    Authors: The manuscript contrasts fast gates with slower ones but lacks explicit control calculations in linear-resonator or low-anharmonicity limits. We acknowledge this gap and will revise the results section to include such controls: we will recompute eigenphase curvatures for the same gate protocols with the transmon nonlinearity set to zero (linear resonators) and with reduced anharmonicity, demonstrating that the reported large curvature fluctuations are absent in these integrable cases and thus specific to the chaotic regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes a curvature-based statistical analysis of instantaneous eigenphases of the time-evolution operator as a diagnostic for identifying subspaces affected by chaotic fluctuations in transmon systems, then applies the diagnostic to fast entangling gates to report transient partial chaos near the quantum speed limit. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the method is presented as an independent statistical identifier and the conclusion follows from its application to the two-transmon dynamics. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No information available from abstract to identify free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5646 in / 821 out tokens · 23019 ms · 2026-05-24T05:32:26.486896+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Characterization of the chaotic phase in the tilted Bose-Hubbard model

    quant-ph 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    The chaotic phase of the tilted Bose-Hubbard model is identified via eigenstate structure and energy spectrum statistics as a function of energy, tilt strength, and interaction, with moderate tilt enhancing chaos and ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Krantz, M

    P. Krantz, M. Kjaergaard, F. Yan, T. P. Orlando, S. Gustavsson, and W. D. Oliver, A quantum engineer’s guide to superconduct- ing qubits, Applied Physics Reviews 6 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    J. J. Garc ´ıa-Ripoll,Quantum Information and Quantum Optics with Superconducting Circuits (Cambridge University Press, 2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Berke, E

    C. Berke, E. Varvelis, S. Trebst, A. Altland, and D. P. DiVin- cenzo, Transmon platform for quantum computing challenged by chaotic fluctuations, Nat. Commun. 13, 2495 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Cohen, A

    J. Cohen, A. Petrescu, R. Shillito, and A. Blais, Reminiscence of Classical Chaos in Driven Transmons, PRX Quantum 4, 020312 (2023). 9

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    B ¨orner, C

    S.-D. B ¨orner, C. Berke, D. P. DiVincenzo, S. Trebst, and A. Altland, Classical Chaos in Quantum Computers (2023), arXiv:2304.14435

    work page arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    F. W. Strauch, P. R. Johnson, A. J. Dragt, C. J. Lobb, J. R. An- derson, and F. C. Wellstood, Quantum Logic Gates for Coupled Superconducting Phase Qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 167005 (2003)

    work page 2003

  7. [7]

    Magnard, P

    P. Magnard, P. Kurpiers, B. Royer, T. Walter, J.-C. Besse, S. Gasparinetti, M. Pechal, J. Heinsoo, S. Storz, A. Blais, and A. Wallraff, Fast and Unconditional All-Microwave Reset of a Superconducting Qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 060502 (2018)

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Deffner and S

    S. Deffner and S. Campbell, Quantum speed limits: from Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle to optimal quantum control, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 50, 453001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    M. H. Goerz, F. Motzoi, K. B. Whaley, and C. P. Koch, Charting the circuit QED design landscape using optimal control theory, npj Quantum Inf. 3, 37 (2017)

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    C. P. Koch, U. Boscain, T. Calarco, G. Dirr, S. Filipp, S. J. Glaser, R. Kosloff, S. Montangero, T. Schulte-Herbr ¨uggen, D. Sugny, and F. K. Wilhelm, Quantum optimal control in quantum technologies. strategic report on current status, visions and goals for research in europe, EPJ Quantum Technol. 9, 19 (2022), 2205.12110

    work page arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Zhang, J

    J. Zhang, J. Vala, S. Sastry, and K. B. Whaley, Minimum Con- struction of Two-Qubit Quantum Operations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 020502 (2004)

    work page 2004

  12. [12]

    Supplemental material

    work page

  13. [13]

    Kullback and R

    S. Kullback and R. A. Leibler, On Information and Sufficiency, Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79 (1951)

    work page 1951

  14. [14]

    Filippone, P

    M. Filippone, P. W. Brouwer, J. Eisert, and F. von Oppen, Drude weight fluctuations in many-body localized systems, Phys. Rev. B 94, 201112 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    von Oppen, Exact distribution of eigenvalue curvatures of chaotic quantum systems, Phys

    F. von Oppen, Exact distribution of eigenvalue curvatures of chaotic quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 798 (1994)

    work page 1994

  16. [16]

    Maksymov, P

    A. Maksymov, P. Sierant, and J. Zakrzewski, Energy level dy- namics across the many-body localization transition, Phys. Rev. B 99, 224202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    S. J. Garratt, S. Roy, and J. T. Chalker, Local resonances and parametric level dynamics in the many-body localized phase, Phys. Rev. B 104, 184203 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [18]

    M. M. M ¨uller, D. M. Reich, M. Murphy, H. Yuan, J. Vala, K. B. Whaley, T. Calarco, and C. P. Koch, Optimizing entangling quantum gates for physical systems, Phys. Rev. A 84, 042315 (2011)

    work page 2011

  19. [19]

    A. V . Andreev, A. G. Balanov, T. M. Fromhold, M. T. Green- away, A. E. Hramov, W. Li, V . V . Makarov, and A. M. Zagoskin, Emergence and control of complex behaviors in driven systems of interacting qubits with dissipation, npj Quantum Inf. 7, 1 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Aifer and S

    M. Aifer and S. Deffner, From quantum speed limits to energy- efficient quantum gates, New J. Phys. 24, 055002 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    J. P. Palao, D. M. Reich, and C. P. Koch, Steering the optimiza- tion pathway in the control landscape using constraints, Phys. Rev. A 88, 053409 (2013)

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    M. H. Goerz, E. J. Halperin, J. M. Aytac, C. P. Koch, and K. B. Whaley, Robustness of high-fidelity Rydberg gates with single- site addressability, Phys. Rev. A 90, 032329 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Koswara, V

    A. Koswara, V . Bhutoria, and R. Chakrabarti, Robust control of quantum dynamics under input and parameter uncertainty, Phys. Rev. A 104, 053118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Araki, F

    T. Araki, F. Nori, and C. Gneiting, Robust quantum control with disorder-dressed evolution, Phys. Rev. A107, 032609 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    C. A. Weidner, E. A. Reed, J. Monroe, B. Sheller, S. O’Neil, E. Maas, E. A. Jonckheere, F. C. Langbein, and S. G. Schirmer, Robust quantum control in closed and open systems: Theory and practice (2023), arXiv:2401.00294 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    kinematic fitting

    D. Basilewitsch, S.-D. B ¨orner, C. Berke, A. Altland, S. Trebst, and C. P. Koch, Data underpinning ‘Chaotic fluctuations in a universal set of transmon qubit gates’, 10.5281/zen- odo.10160591 (2023)

    work page doi:10.5281/zen- 2023

  27. [27]

    Note that this sorting might break continuity if a single eigen- phase ϕn(t) is viewed as a function of time

    work page

  28. [28]

    Oganesyan and D

    V . Oganesyan and D. A. Huse, Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature, Phys. Rev. B 75, 155111 (2007)

    work page 2007

  29. [29]

    However, where the statistics of nearby levels is concerned, this point does not matter

    Strictly speaking, the distribution of maximally chaotic unitary operators is governed by the circular ensembles [32]. However, where the statistics of nearby levels is concerned, this point does not matter

    work page

  30. [30]

    Y . Y . Atas, E. Bogomolny, O. Giraud, and G. Roux, Distribution of the Ratio of Consecutive Level Spacings in Random Matrix Ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 084101 (2013)

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order cor- relators, Nat

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order cor- relators, Nat. Phys. 14, 988 (2018)

    work page 2018

  32. [32]

    T. Guhr, A. M ¨uller-Groeling, and H. A. Weidenm ¨uller, Random-matrix theories in quantum physics: common con- cepts, Physics Reports 299, 189 (1998)

    work page 1998