REVIEW 1 cited by
A unified algorithm for multi-particle correlations between azimuthal angle and transverse momentum in ultra-relativistic nuclear collisions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Multi-particle correlations between azimuthal angle and mean transverse momentum are a powerful tool for probing size and shape correlations in the initial conditions of heavy-ion collisions. These correlations have also been employed to investigate nuclear structure, including potential nuclear shape phase transitions at the energy frontier. However, their implementation is highly nontrivial, and prior studies have been mostly limited to lower-order correlations, such as the modified Pearson correlation coefficient, $\rho(v_{\rm n}^{2}, [p_{\rm T}])$. This paper presents a unified framework that employs a recursive algorithm, enabling the efficient evaluation of arbitrary-order correlations while maintaining computational efficiency. This framework is demonstrated using widely adopted transport models, including AMPT and HIJING. The proposed unified algorithm for multi-particle correlations between azimuthal angle and transverse momentum provides a systematic and efficient approach for multi-particle correlation analyses. Its application in experiments at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider and the Large Hadron Collider facilitates the exploration of nuclear structure at ultra-relativistic energies.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Nuclear Physics Confronts Relativistic Collisions Of Isobars
RHIC isobar data are explained by different shapes of 96Ru and 96Zr, with 96Zr showing a large octupole deformation, so nuclear structure uncertainty, not the magnetic field, dominates the observed ratios.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.