Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

M1: Towards Scalable Test-Time Compute with Mamba Reasoning Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.10449 v3 pith:VFZ3XYXJ submitted 2025-04-14 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords reasoningmodelsgenerationlinearmambatest-timeapproachcompared
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Effective reasoning is crucial to solving complex mathematical problems. Recent large language models (LLMs) have boosted performance by scaling test-time computation through long chain-of-thought reasoning. However, transformer-based models are inherently limited in extending context length due to their quadratic computational complexity and linear memory requirements. In this paper, we introduce a novel hybrid linear RNN reasoning model, M1, built on the Mamba architecture, which allows memory-efficient inference. Our approach leverages a distillation process from existing reasoning models and is further enhanced through RL training. Experimental results on the AIME and MATH benchmarks show that M1 not only outperforms previous linear RNN models but also matches the performance of state-of-the-art Deepseek R1 distilled reasoning models at a similar scale. We also compare our generation speed with a highly performant general purpose inference engine, vLLM, and observe more than a 3x speedup compared to a same size transformer. With throughput speedup, we are able to achieve higher accuracy compared to DeepSeek R1 distilled transformer reasoning models under a fixed generation time budget using self-consistency voting. Overall, we introduce a hybrid Mamba reasoning model and provide a more effective approach to scaling test-time generation using self-consistency or long chain of thought reasoning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bridging Compute- and Data-Optimal Pretraining

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Pretraining loss obeys a single law in which repeated or paraphrased tokens count as η(N, data-per-parameter, expansion-ratio) fresh tokens, with total effective data saturating as derived tokens grow.

  2. Kinetics: Rethinking Test-Time Scaling Laws

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A memory-aware test-time scaling law shows small models are overestimated and sparse attention is needed for efficient scaling.

  3. When Perplexity Lies: Generation-Focused Distillation of Hybrid Sequence Models

    cs.CL 2026-03 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Perplexity-based scoring systematically understates teacher–student gaps in distilled hybrid LLMs and can reverse design-choice rankings; generation-based evaluation is the more reliable protocol.

  4. Scaling Reasoning without Attention

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A purely attention-free Mamba-2 model, fine-tuned with PromptCoT-style synthetic data, reaches state-of-the-art scores on AIME and LiveCodeBench among open models of its size and surpasses Gemma3-27B on three benchmarks.

  5. Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey

    cs.AI 2025-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review that categorizes methods for shortening and adaptively triggering chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models.

Pith tools