pith. sign in

arxiv: 2504.11244 · v1 · submitted 2025-04-15 · ⚛️ nucl-th · nucl-ex

Multireference covariant density functional theory for shape coexistence and isomerism in ⁴³S

E. F. Zhou , X. Y. Wu , J. Xiang , J. M. Yao , P. Ring This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 20:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th nucl-ex
keywords shape coexistenceisomerismcovariant density functional theorymultireferenceodd-mass nucleiN=2843Squasiparticle configurations
0
0 comments X

The pith

MR-CDFT wave functions built from projected configurations with different shapes and K values reproduce the low-energy spectrum of 43S, with the ground state dominated by an intruder prolate one-quasiparticle state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends multireference covariant density functional theory to odd-mass nuclei by constructing low-lying states as superpositions of intrinsic configurations that differ in shape and K quantum number, then projecting each onto good particle number and angular momentum. Applied to 43S near the N=28 closure, the calculation matches the observed ordering and character of the lowest states. It finds the 3/2− ground state mostly built on the prolate intruder configuration ν1/2−[321], the 7/2−1 state as a high-K isomer on ν7/2−[303], and the 3/2−2 state as a mixture dominated by an oblate K=1/2− configuration. These results illustrate how shape coexistence and K-mixing together produce isomerism without invoking further correlations beyond the chosen density functional and projection.

Core claim

The MR-CDFT calculation reproduces the main features of the low-energy structure in 43S. The ground state 3/2−1 is predominantly the intruder prolate one-quasiparticle configuration ν1/2−[321]. The 7/2−1 state is a high-K isomer built primarily on the prolate configuration ν7/2−[303]. The 3/2−2 state is an admixture dominated by an oblate Kπ=1/2− configuration with a smaller prolate Kπ=3/2− contribution. The method thereby captures the interplay of shape coexistence, K-mixing, and isomerism in odd-mass nuclei around N=28.

What carries the argument

Superpositions of configurations with different intrinsic shapes and K quantum numbers, each projected onto good particle numbers and angular momenta, within the multireference covariant density functional theory framework.

If this is right

  • The ground state 3/2−1 is predominantly composed of the intruder prolate 1qp configuration ν1/2−[321].
  • The 7/2−1 state is a high-K isomer primarily built on the prolate 1qp configuration ν7/2−[303].
  • The 3/2−2 state is an admixture dominated by an oblate configuration with Kπ=1/2− together with a small prolate Kπ=3/2− component.
  • MR-CDFT captures the interplay among shape coexistence, K-mixing, and isomerism in low-energy structure of odd-mass nuclei around N=28.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same limited-configuration projection approach may be used to predict isomer lifetimes and electromagnetic properties in neighboring odd-A nuclei near N=28.
  • If the calculated mixing amplitudes prove accurate, they imply that additional beyond-mean-field correlations play only a minor role for these particular states.
  • Comparison with measured magnetic moments could test whether the dominant intruder configuration assignment holds.

Load-bearing premise

The low-lying states can be adequately described as superpositions of a limited set of intrinsic configurations with different shapes and K quantum numbers, projected onto good particle numbers and angular momenta.

What would settle it

Measurement showing that the electromagnetic transition rates or spectroscopic quadrupole moments of the lowest 3/2− or 7/2− states deviate substantially from those calculated from the reported configuration mixing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.11244 by E. F. Zhou, J. M. Yao, J. Xiang, P. Ring, X. Y. Wu.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) Energies of symmetry-conserving 1qp states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online) Energy spectra of low-lying states in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We extend the multireference covariant density functional theory (MR-CDFT) to describe the low-lying states of the odd-mass nucleus $^{43}$S near the neutron magic number $N=28$ with shape coexistence. The wave functions of the low-lying states are constructed as superpositions of configurations with different intrinsic shapes and $K$ quantum numbers, projected onto good particle numbers and angular momenta. The MR-CDFT successfully reproduces the main features of the low-energy structure in $^{43}$S. Our results indicate that the ground state, $3/2^-_1$, is predominantly composed of the intruder prolate one-quasiparticle (1qp) configuration $\nu1/2^-[321]$. In contrast, the $7/2^-_1$ state is identified as a high-$K$ isomer, primarily built on the prolate 1qp configuration $\nu7/2^-[303]$. Additionally, the $3/2^-_2$ state is found to be an admixture dominated by an oblate configuration with $K^\pi = 1/2^-$, along with a small contribution from a prolate configuration with $K^\pi = 3/2^-$. These results demonstrate the capability of MR-CDFT to capture the intricate interplay among shape coexistence, $K$-mixing, and isomerism in the low-energy structure of odd-mass nuclei around $N = 28$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends multireference covariant density functional theory (MR-CDFT) to the odd-mass nucleus ^{43}S near N=28. Low-lying states are constructed as superpositions of one-quasiparticle configurations with different intrinsic shapes and K values, after particle-number and angular-momentum projection. The central claims are that the method reproduces the main features of the low-energy structure, that the 3/2^-_1 ground state is dominated by the prolate intruder ν1/2^-[321] 1qp configuration, that the 7/2^-_1 state is a high-K isomer built on ν7/2^-[303], and that the 3/2^-_2 state is an oblate K=1/2 admixture with a small prolate K=3/2 component.

Significance. If the quantitative agreement with data can be demonstrated, the work would illustrate the applicability of MR-CDFT with K-mixing to shape coexistence and high-K isomerism in odd nuclei, providing configuration assignments that are difficult to obtain from other methods. The technical extension to blocked quasiparticle states in the multireference framework is a clear strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results section] The central claim that MR-CDFT 'successfully reproduces the main features' of the low-energy structure (Abstract and results section) is not accompanied by explicit numerical comparisons. No table or figure presents calculated excitation energies, B(E2) values, or magnetic moments alongside experimental data, nor are root-mean-square deviations or similar metrics reported. This prevents assessment of whether the reproduction is quantitative or selective.
  2. [results section] The identification of dominant configurations (e.g., ground state as predominantly ν1/2^-[321] prolate 1qp) rests on the truncation to a finite set of 1qp configurations with selected K values. No convergence test is shown demonstrating that the extracted mixing amplitudes remain stable when the configuration space is enlarged to include additional 3qp states or further shape degrees of freedom (results section).
minor comments (2)
  1. [methods or results section] The precise list of intrinsic configurations and K values included in the MR mixing (including how many prolate and oblate shapes) should be tabulated for reproducibility.
  2. Notation for the Nilsson labels (e.g., ν1/2^-[321]) is standard but a brief reminder of the underlying single-particle basis or reference to the chosen covariant functional parameterization would aid clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the positive evaluation of the technical extension of MR-CDFT. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results section] The central claim that MR-CDFT 'successfully reproduces the main features' of the low-energy structure (Abstract and results section) is not accompanied by explicit numerical comparisons. No table or figure presents calculated excitation energies, B(E2) values, or magnetic moments alongside experimental data, nor are root-mean-square deviations or similar metrics reported. This prevents assessment of whether the reproduction is quantitative or selective.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical comparisons are necessary to substantiate the claim of reproducing the main features. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated table in the results section that directly compares the calculated excitation energies, B(E2) transition strengths, and magnetic moments with the available experimental data. We will also report root-mean-square deviations to provide a quantitative measure of agreement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [results section] The identification of dominant configurations (e.g., ground state as predominantly ν1/2^-[321] prolate 1qp) rests on the truncation to a finite set of 1qp configurations with selected K values. No convergence test is shown demonstrating that the extracted mixing amplitudes remain stable when the configuration space is enlarged to include additional 3qp states or further shape degrees of freedom (results section).

    Authors: The present framework is formulated for superpositions of 1qp configurations; inclusion of 3qp states would require a substantial methodological extension beyond the scope of this work. Nevertheless, we will add an explicit discussion in the results section justifying the chosen 1qp configuration space and will test the stability of the mixing amplitudes by systematically varying the included K values and shapes within the 1qp space. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies established MR-CDFT with external parameters

full rationale

The paper's central results follow from constructing and diagonalizing a Hamiltonian matrix of particle-number and angular-momentum projected 1qp configurations within a covariant density functional whose parameters are taken from prior literature (not fitted to 43S data here). No equation reduces a claimed prediction to an input by construction, no self-citation chain supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and the configuration mixing is not renamed or smuggled from the authors' own prior ansatz in a way that forces the output. The method is self-contained against external benchmarks once the functional and configuration selection are granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation rests on the validity of the covariant density functional for odd-mass nuclei, the completeness of the selected intrinsic configurations, and the accuracy of angular-momentum and particle-number projection for capturing K-mixing.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The chosen covariant density functional provides a sufficiently accurate mean-field description of the intrinsic states in the N=28 region.
    Invoked when constructing the basis of intrinsic configurations for projection.
  • ad hoc to paper A finite set of prolate and oblate shapes with selected K values is adequate to span the low-lying spectrum.
    The abstract states that wave functions are superpositions of configurations with different intrinsic shapes and K quantum numbers.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5809 in / 1499 out tokens · 32019 ms · 2026-05-22T20:39:25.411891+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages · 15 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Yano, Nucl

    Y . Yano, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B261, 1009 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Glasmacher, B

    T. Glasmacher, B. Sherrill, W. Nazarewicz, A. Gade, P. Man- tica, J. Wei, G. Bollen, and B. Bull, Nucl. Phys. News 27, 28 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Y . Ye, X. Yang, H. Sakurai, and B. Hu, Nature Rev. Phys.7, 21 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Caurier, G

    E. Caurier, G. Martinez-Pinedo, F. Nowacki, A. Poves, and A. P. Zuker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 427 (2005), arXiv:nucl- th/0402046

    work page arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Nuclear magic numbers: new features far from stability

    O. Sorlin and M. G. Porquet, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 61, 602 (2008), arXiv:0805.2561 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Otsuka, A

    T. Otsuka, A. Gade, O. Sorlin, T. Suzuki, and Y . Utsuno, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015002 (2020), arXiv:1805.06501 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Tsunoda, T

    N. Tsunoda, T. Otsuka, K. Takayanagi, N. Shimizu, T. Suzuki, Y . Utsuno, S. Yoshida, and H. Ueno, Nature587, 66 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 75, 1969 (1949)

    work page 1969

  9. [9]

    Haxel, J

    O. Haxel, J. H. D. Jensen, and H. E. Suess, Phys. Rev. 75, 1766 (1949)

    work page 1949

  10. [10]

    Sorlin et al., Phys

    O. Sorlin et al., Phys. Rev. C 47, 2941 (1993)

    work page 1993

  11. [11]

    Scheit et al., Phys

    H. Scheit et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3967 (1996)

    work page 1996

  12. [12]

    Glasmacher et al., Phys

    T. Glasmacher et al., Phys. Lett. B 395, 163 (1997)

    work page 1997

  13. [13]

    Is the structure of 42Si understood?

    A. Gade et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 222501 (2019), arXiv:1905.04142 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Collapse of the N=28 shell closure in $^{42}$Si

    B. Bastin et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 022503 (2007), arXiv:0705.4526 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  15. [15]

    Well-developed deformation in 42Si

    S. Takeuchi et al. , Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 182501 (2012), arXiv:1207.6191 [nucl-ex]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  16. [16]

    H. L. Crawford et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 052501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Grévy et al

    S. Grévy et al. , The European Physical Journal A 25, 111 (2005)

    work page 2005

  18. [18]

    T. R. Rodriguez and J. L. Egido, Phys. Rev. C 84, 051307 (2011), arXiv:1109.6516 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  19. [19]

    J. L. Egido, M. Borrajo, and T. R. Rodríguez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 052502 (2016), arXiv:1512.04232 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  20. [20]

    Z. P. Li, J. M. Yao, D. Vretenar, T. Niksic, H. Chen, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 84, 054304 (2011), arXiv:1209.6074 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  21. [21]

    Santiago-Gonzalez et al., Phys

    D. Santiago-Gonzalez et al., Phys. Rev. C 83, 061305 (2011)

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    J. J. Parker et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 052501 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Nature of isomerism in exotic sulfur isotopes

    Y . Utsuno, N. Shimizu, T. Otsuka, T. Yoshida, and Y . Tsunoda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 032501 (2015), arXiv:1407.0444 [nucl- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    Sarazin, H

    F. Sarazin, H. Savajols, W. Mittig, F. Nowacki, N. A. Orr, Z. Ren, P. Roussel-Chomaz, G. Auger, D. Baiborodin, A. V . Belozyorov, C. Borcea, E. Caurier, Z. Dlouhý, A. Gillibert, A. S. Lalleman, M. Lewitowicz, S. M. Lukyanov, F. de Oliveira, 7 Y . E. Penionzhkevich, D. Ridikas, H. Sakuraï, O. Tarasov, and A. de Vismes, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5062 (2000)

    work page 2000

  25. [25]

    Gaudefroy et al., Phys

    L. Gaudefroy et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 092501 (2009)

    work page 2009

  26. [26]

    Chevrier et al., Phys

    R. Chevrier et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 162501 (2012)

    work page 2012

  27. [27]

    Kimura, Y

    M. Kimura, Y . Taniguchi, Y . Kanada-En’yo, H. Horiuchi, and K. Ikeda, Phys. Rev. C 87, 011301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Chevrier and L

    R. Chevrier and L. Gaudefroy, Phys. Rev. C89, 051301 (2014)

    work page 2014

  29. [29]

    Mijatovi ´c et al., Phys

    T. Mijatovi ´c et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 012501 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Longfellow, D

    B. Longfellow, D. Weisshaar, A. Gade, B. A. Brown, D. Bazin, K. W. Brown, B. Elman, J. Pereira, D. Rhodes, and M. Spieker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 232501 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    Q. Yuan, J. G. Li, and W. Zuo, Phys. Rev. C 109, L041301 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    Vretenar, A

    D. Vretenar, A. Afanasjev, G. Lalazissis, and P. Ring, Physics Reports 409, 101 (2005)

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    J. Meng, H. Toki, S. G. Zhou, S. Q. Zhang, W. H. Long, and L. S. Geng, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57, 470 (2006), arXiv:nucl- th/0508020

    work page arXiv 2006

  34. [34]

    Meng, Relativistic Density Functional for Nuclear Structure , V ol

    J. Meng, Relativistic Density Functional for Nuclear Structure , V ol. 26 (World Scientific, 2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    J. M. Yao, J. Meng, P. Ring, and D. Pena Arteaga, Phys. Rev. C 79, 044312 (2009), arXiv:0903.5027 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  36. [36]

    J. M. Yao, J. Meng, P. Ring, and D. Vretenar, Phys. Rev. C 81, 044311 (2010), arXiv:0912.2650 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  37. [37]

    Relativistic Nuclear Energy Density Functionals: Mean-Field and Beyond

    T. Niksic, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 66, 519 (2011), arXiv:1102.4193 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  38. [38]

    J. M. Yao, K. Hagino, Z. P. Li, J. Meng, and P. Ring, Phys. Rev. C 89, 054306 (2014), arXiv:1403.4812 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  39. [39]

    J. M. Yao, E. F. Zhou, and Z. P. Li, Phys. Rev. C 92, 041304 (2015), arXiv:1507.03298 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  40. [40]

    E. F. Zhou and J. M. Yao, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 32, 2340011 (2023), arXiv:2309.09488 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    J. M. Yao, J. Meng, Y . F. Niu, and P. Ring, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 126, 103965 (2022), arXiv:2111.15543 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    H. Mei, K. Hagino, and J. M. Yao, Phys. Rev. C 93, 011301 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [43]

    H. Xia, X. Wu, H. Mei, and J. Yao, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 62, 42011 (2019), arXiv:1811.01486 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  44. [44]

    H. Xia, X. Wu, H. Mei, and J. Yao, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 66, 252011 (2023), arXiv:2211.09356 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    E. F. Zhou, X. Y . Wu, and J. M. Yao, Phys. Rev. C109, 034305 (2024), arXiv:2311.15305 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Ring and P

    P. Ring and P. Schuck, The nuclear many-body problem (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1980)

    work page 1980

  47. [47]

    P. W. Zhao, Z. P. Li, J. M. Yao, and J. Meng, Phys. Rev. C 82, 054319 (2010), arXiv:1002.1789 [nucl-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. 89, 1102 (1953)

    work page 1953

  49. [49]

    S. J. Krieger, P. Bonche, H. Flocard, P. Quentin, and M. S. Weiss, Nucl. Phys. A 517, 275 (1990)

    work page 1990