Pith. sign in

REVIEW 68 references

Refining the Understanding of Operator Size Dynamics in Open Quantum Systems

T0 review · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In Brownian SYK models, operator size under the bath-traced Lindblad definition shows a scrambling signature only for intra-system interactions, with the same early-time critical point as the full-contour definition, plus finite-size corrections.

arxiv 2504.12056 v1 pith:W6NKGHFF submitted 2025-04-16 quant-ph cond-mat.str-elhep-th

Haolin Jiang , Pengfei Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.str-elhep-th
keywords sizeoperatorquantumdynamicssystemsopeninformationsystem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Quantum information can spread through a many-body system, and one way to track this is to ask how many fermions, or qubits, an operator involves. That number is called its size. In an open system, where the system is coupled to a bath, there are two natural definitions of operator size. Definition I keeps the bath in the calculation and evolves operators with the full Hamiltonian. Definition II traces the bath out and evolves operators with a Lindblad equation. The two definitions disagree in important ways, for example on whether a scrambling transition exists at all. This paper asks exactly when the two definitions agree and when they do not. The authors use Brownian SYK models, where couplings are random and refreshed at every time step, which allows exact calculations. They derive master equations for the size distribution under both definitions. With an intra-system four-fermion interaction, both definitions show early-time growth above a threshold. With a system-bath interaction involving three system fermions, only the full Definition I produces a scrambling transition; the Lindblad version only decays. The paper also computes finite-size effects: the critical ratio shifts at order 1/N, and late-time decay is exponentially small in system size, both invisible to the scramblon effective theory. A caveat is that the Lindblad size is not normalized, and part of the apparent threshold comes from operator norm decay. The exact equations still provide a concrete map between the two definitions.
Extended reading notes

Core claim

The summary states that under Definition II, the signature of a scrambling transition appears only when intra-system interactions are present, and the early-time critical point for Model B coincides with the Definition I transition. If the paper is correct, the two definitions of operator size are inequivalent in a precise way: system-bath interactions alone produce no growth under the Lindblad definition, while intra-system interactions produce a short-time signature at the same V1/V4 ratio as the full-contour definition. The paper further claims finite-size corrections that the scramblon effective theory misses, including a finite-N shift of the critical ratio and an exponentially small late-time decay of operator size under Definition I.

Load-bearing premise

The central results rest on replacing the bath Schwinger operators G, built from M bath fermions, by their c-number expectation values in Eqs. (26) and (27). This is an M-to-infinity central-limit step that assumes bath fluctuations and intrinsic bath dynamics are negligible, justified by the claim that the bath scrambling time is of order ln M and diverges. If finite-M bath fluctuations or bath dynamics contribute at the timescales studied, the exact rate equations (30)-(33) and the transition conditions derived from them could change. This assumption is load-bearing because it is what turns the two different bath boundary conditions into the different rate equations for Definition I and Definition II.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No fitted parameters appear; V1, V3, and V4 are Hamiltonian inputs rather than numbers fit to data. The axioms are the standard Brownian SYK large-M bath assumptions plus prior operator-state identities. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Disorder average over independent Brownian couplings can be performed over an infinitesimal time step, yielding a Liouvillian L with delta(0)=1/dt (Eq. 20).
    This is the standard Brownian SYK treatment; it requires the couplings to be white-noise and independent at each time, as chosen in Eq. (12).
  • domain assumption The bath has M-to-infinity Majorana fermions, so the Schwinger operators G can be replaced by their expectation values in Eqs. (26) and (27), and bath fluctuations and intrinsic bath dynamics are negligible.
    Central limit theorem suppresses 1/M fluctuations; the paper argues the bath scrambling time is of order ln M and diverges. This underpins the exact rate equations (30)-(33).
  • standard math The operator-state mapping identities, including the Lz eigenstates |Pn) and Wick theorem for Gaussian states, are valid.
    Borrowed from prior literature, Refs. [34,38,43], and not re-derived in this paper.
  • domain assumption For Definition II, the Born-Markov approximation holds, and OII(t) equals the trace of the full Heisenberg operator over the bath, up to normalization (Eq. 18).
    Open-system modeling; the paper states the Born approximation is exact in the large-M Brownian limit and the Markov approximation is justified by Brownian couplings.
  • domain assumption The system has permutation symmetry and the initial operator is averaged over sites, confining dynamics to the N+1-dimensional spin-N/2 subspace.
    Invoked around Eq. (25) to reduce the Liouvillian to a finite-dimensional rate equation for P(n,t).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Refining the Understanding of Operator Size Dynamics in Open Quantum Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W6NKGHFF

@misc{pith2026250412056,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Refining the Understanding of Operator Size Dynamics in Open Quantum Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W6NKGHFF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.12056}
}
read the original abstract

Information scrambling refers to the phenomenon in which local quantum information in a many-body system becomes dispersed throughout the entire system under unitary evolution. It has been extensively studied in closed quantum systems, where it is quantified by operator size growth, revealing deep connections between condensed matter physics, high-energy physics, and quantum information. However, when extending the study of operator size dynamics to open quantum systems, two different definitions of operator size distributions emerge. These definitions are based on different treatments of the bath. In this work, we aim to establish a unified picture for operator size dynamics in open quantum systems, using the solvable Brownian SYK models at generic system size. In particular, we provide the conditions under which the signature of scrambling transition, discovered using one particular definition, appears in operator size dynamics under the other definition. Additionally, we extend previous studies by exploring finite-size effects that are not captured by the scramblon theory. Our results provide a refined understanding of operator size dynamics in open quantum systems.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.12056 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematics of various terms in the Brownian SYK model, including (a) direct hopping, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of the evolution contours for two different definitions, differing only in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. A sketch for the derivation of the Liouvillian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical results of the evolution of average operator size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical results of the evolution of average operator size [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Numerical results for the second-largest eigenvalue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hayden and J

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill, Black holes as mirrors: Quantum information in random subsystems, JHEP 09 (2007) 120, [ 0708.4025]

    arXiv 2007

  2. [2]

    Sekino and L

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, Fast Scramblers, JHEP 10 (2008) 065, [ 0808.2096]

    arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, Stringy effects in scrambling , JHEP 05 (2015) 132, [1412.6087]

    arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Kitaev, talk given at fundamental physics prize symposium , 2014

    A. Kitaev, talk given at fundamental physics prize symposium , 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Qi, Does gravity come from quantum information? , Nature Phys

    X.-L. Qi, Does gravity come from quantum information? , Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 984–987

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators , Nature Phys

    B. Swingle, Unscrambling the physics of out-of-time-order correlators , Nature Phys. 14 (2018) 988–990

    work page 2018

  7. [7]

    Islam, R

    R. Islam, R. Ma, P. M. Preiss, M. Eric Tai, A. Lukin, M. Rispoli et al., Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system , Nature 528 (Dec., 2015) 77–83, [1509.01160]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [8]

    J. Li, R. Fan, H. Wang, B. Ye, B. Zeng, H. Zhai et al., Measuring Out-of-Time-Order Correlators on a Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Quantum Simulator , Phys. Rev. X 7 (2017) 031011, [ 1609.01246]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    G¨ arttner, J

    M. G¨ arttner, J. G. Bohnet, A. Safavi-Naini, M. L. Wall, J. J. Bollinger and A. M. Rey, Measuring out-of-time-order correlations and multiple quantum spectra in a trapped ion quantum magnet, Nature Phys. 13 (2017) 781, [ 1608.08938]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Brydges, A

    T. Brydges, A. Elben, P. Jurcevic, B. Vermersch, C. Maier, B. P. Lanyon et al., Probing R´ enyi entanglement entropy via randomized measurements, Science 364 (Apr., 2019) 260–263, [1806.05747]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    C. M. S´ anchez, A. K. Chattah, K. X. Wei, L. Buljubasich, P. Cappellaro and H. M. Pastawski, Emergent perturbation independent decay of the Loschmidt echo in a many-spin system studied through scaled dipolar dynamics , arXiv e-prints (Feb., 2019) arXiv:1902.06628, [1902.06628]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    K. A. Landsman, C. Figgatt, T. Schuster, N. M. Linke, B. Yoshida, N. Y. Yao et al., Verified quantum information scrambling, Nature 567 (Mar., 2019) 61–65, [ 1806.02807]. 16

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    M. K. Joshi, A. Elben, B. Vermersch, T. Brydges, C. Maier, P. Zoller et al., Quantum Information Scrambling in a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator with Tunable Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (June, 2020) 240505, [ 2001.02176]

    2020 arXiv

  6. [14]

    M. S. Blok, V. V. Ramasesh, T. Schuster, K. O’Brien, J. M. Kreikebaum, D. Dahlen et al., Quantum Information Scrambling on a Superconducting Qutrit Processor , Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 021010, [ 2003.03307]

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    F. D. Dom´ ınguez, M. C. Rodr´ ıguez, R. Kaiser, D. Suter and G. A.´Alvarez, Decoherence scaling transition in the dynamics of quantum information scrambling , Phys. Rev. A 104 (July, 2021) 012402, [2005.12361]

    2021 arXiv

  8. [16]

    F. D. Dom´ ınguez and G. A. ´Alvarez, Dynamics of quantum information scrambling under decoherence effects measured via active spin clusters , Phys. Rev. A

  9. [17]

    Mi et al., Information scrambling in quantum circuits , Science 374 (2021) abg5029, [2101.08870]

    X. Mi et al., Information scrambling in quantum circuits , Science 374 (2021) abg5029, [2101.08870]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Cotler, T

    J. Cotler, T. Schuster and M. Mohseni, Information-theoretic Hardness of Out-of-time-order Correlators, 2208.02256

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    C. M. S´ anchez, A. K. Chattah and H. M. Pastawski, Emergent decoherence induced by quantum chaos in a many-body system: A Loschmidt echo observation through NMR , Phys. Rev. A 105 (May, 2022) 052232, [2112.00607]

    2022 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Liang, Z

    X. Liang, Z. Yue, Y.-X. Chao, Z.-X. Hua, Y. Lin, M. K. Tey et al., Observation of anomalous information scrambling in a Rydberg atom array , 2410.16174

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Li et al., Emergent universal quench dynamics in randomly interacting spin models , Nature Phys

    Y. Li et al., Emergent universal quench dynamics in randomly interacting spin models , Nature Phys. 20 (2024) 1966–1972, [ 2406.07625]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 03 (2015) 051, [1409.8180]

    2015 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Nahum, S

    A. Nahum, S. Vijay and J. Haah, Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits , Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 021014, [ 1705.08975]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [24]

    von Keyserlingk, T

    C. von Keyserlingk, T. Rakovszky, F. Pollmann and S. Sondhi, Operator hydrodynamics, OTOCs, and entanglement growth in systems without conservation laws , Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 021013, [ 1705.08910]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Khemani, A

    V. Khemani, A. Vishwanath and D. A. Huse, Operator spreading and the emergence of dissipation in unitary dynamics with conservation laws , Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018) 031057, [1710.09835]

    2018 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Hunter-Jones, Operator growth in random quantum circuits with symmetry , arXiv e-prints (Dec., 2018) arXiv:1812.08219, [ 1812.08219]

    N. Hunter-Jones, Operator growth in random quantum circuits with symmetry , arXiv e-prints (Dec., 2018) arXiv:1812.08219, [ 1812.08219]

    2018 arXiv

  19. [27]

    D. A. Roberts, D. Stanford and A. Streicher, Operator growth in the SYK model , JHEP 06 (2018) 122, [ 1802.02633]. 17

    2018 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Chen and A

    C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas, Operator Growth Bounds from Graph Theory , Commun. Math. Phys. 385 (2021) 1273–1323, [ 1905.03682]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Lucas, Operator size at finite temperature and planckian bounds on quantum dynamics, Phys

    A. Lucas, Operator size at finite temperature and planckian bounds on quantum dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (May, 2019) 216601

    2019

  22. [30]

    X. Chen, Y. Gu and A. Lucas, Many-body quantum dynamics slows down at low density , SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 071, [ 2007.10352]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Lucas and A

    A. Lucas and A. Osborne, Operator growth bounds in a cartoon matrix model , J. Math. Phys. 61 (2020) 122301, [ 2007.07165]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Yin and A

    C. Yin and A. Lucas, Quantum operator growth bounds for kicked tops and semiclassical spin chains, Phys. Rev. A 103 (2021) 042414, [ 2010.06592]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Zhou and X

    T. Zhou and X. Chen, Operator dynamics in a brownian quantum circuit , Phys. Rev. E 99 (May, 2019) 052212

    2019

  26. [34]

    Qi and A

    X.-L. Qi and A. Streicher, Quantum Epidemiology: Operator Growth, Thermal Effects, and SYK, JHEP 08 (2019) 012, [ 1810.11958]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    B. C. Dias, M. Haque, P. Ribeiro and P. McClarty, Diffusive Operator Spreading for Random Unitary Free Fermion Circuits, arXiv e-prints (Feb., 2021) arXiv:2102.09846, [2102.09846]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Y. Wu, P. Zhang and H. Zhai, Scrambling ability of quantum neural network architectures, Physical Review Research 3 (Sept., 2021) L032057, [ 2011.07698]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Y. Gu, A. Kitaev and P. Zhang, A two-way approach to out-of-time-order correlators , JHEP 03 (2022) 133, [ 2111.12007]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Yao, Notes on solvable models of many-body quantum chaos , arXiv e-prints (Aug.,

    S. Yao, Notes on solvable models of many-body quantum chaos , arXiv e-prints (Aug.,

  31. [39]

    Zhang and Y

    P. Zhang and Y. Gu, Operator size distribution in large N quantum mechanics of Majorana fermions, JHEP 10 (2023) 018, [ 2212.04358]

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Zhang, Information scrambling and entanglement dynamics of complex Brownian Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, JHEP 04 (2023) 105, [ 2301.03189]

    P. Zhang, Information scrambling and entanglement dynamics of complex Brownian Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models, JHEP 04 (2023) 105, [ 2301.03189]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Liu and P

    Z. Liu and P. Zhang, Signature of Scramblon Effective Field Theory in Random Spin Models, 2306.05678

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    T.-G. Zhou, Y. Gu and P. Zhang, Size winding mechanism beyond maximal chaos , JHEP 11 (2024) 044, [ 2401.09524]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Xu, Dynamics of operator size distribution in q-local quantum Brownian SYK and spin models, J

    S. Xu, Dynamics of operator size distribution in q-local quantum Brownian SYK and spin models, J. Phys. A 58 (2025) 045301, [ 2408.11737]. 18

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov, Quasiclassical Method in the Theory of Superconductivity, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 28 (June,

  37. [45]

    Y. Chen, H. Zhai and P. Zhang, Tunable Quantum Chaos in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Model Coupled to a Thermal Bath , JHEP 07 (2017) 150, [ 1705.09818]

    2017 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Zhang, Evaporation dynamics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys

    P. Zhang, Evaporation dynamics of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 245104, [ 1909.10637]

    2019 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Almheiri, A

    A. Almheiri, A. Milekhin and B. Swingle, Universal Constraints on Energy Flow and SYK Thermalization, 1912.04912

    1912 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Zhang and Z

    P. Zhang and Z. Yu, Dynamical Transition of Operator Size Growth in Quantum Systems Embedded in an Environment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 250401

    2023

  41. [49]

    Weinstein, S

    Z. Weinstein, S. P. Kelly, J. Marino and E. Altman, Scrambling Transition in a Radiative Random Unitary Circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 220404, [ 2210.14242]

    2023 arXiv

  42. [50]

    C. Liu, H. Tang and H. Zhai, Krylov complexity in open quantum systems , Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (Aug, 2023) 033085

    2023

  43. [51]

    Bhattacharya, P

    A. Bhattacharya, P. Nandy, P. P. Nath and H. Sahu, Operator growth and Krylov construction in dissipative open quantum systems , JHEP 12 (2022) 081, [ 2207.05347]

    2022 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Schuster and N

    T. Schuster and N. Y. Yao, Operator Growth in Open Quantum Systems , Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 160402, [ 2208.12272]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Bhattacharjee, X

    B. Bhattacharjee, X. Cao, P. Nandy and T. Pathak, Operator growth in open quantum systems: lessons from the dissipative SYK , JHEP 03 (2023) 054, [ 2212.06180]

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Bhattacharjee, P

    B. Bhattacharjee, P. Nandy and T. Pathak, Operator dynamics in Lindbladian SYK: a Krylov complexity perspective, JHEP 01 (2024) 094, [ 2311.00753]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Zhang and Z

    P. Zhang and Z. Yu, Environment-induced information scrambling transition with charge conservations, AAPPS Bull. 34 (2024) 19, [ 2403.08622]

    2024 arXiv

  48. [56]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, J. J. M. Verbaarschot and J.-p. Zheng,Lyapunov exponent as a signature of dissipative many-body quantum chaos , Phys. Rev. D 110 (Oct, 2024) 086010

    2024

  49. [57]

    A. M. Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa, C. Liu, L. S´ a, J. J. M. Verbaarschot and J.-p. Zheng,Anatomy of information scrambling and decoherence in the integrable Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , 2412.20182

  50. [58]

    Sachdev and J

    S. Sachdev and J. Ye, Gapless spin-fluid ground state in a random quantum Heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (May, 1993) 3339–3342, [cond-mat/9212030]

    1993 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A simple model of quantum holography

    A. Kitaev, “A simple model of quantum holography.” Talks at KITP http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev/ and http://online.kitp.ucsb.edu/online/entangled15/kitaev2/, April and May, 2015. 19

    2015

  52. [60]

    Maldacena and D

    J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 106002, [ 1604.07818]

    2016 arXiv

  53. [61]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity , 1806.06840

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    S¨ underhauf, L

    C. S¨ underhauf, L. Piroli, X.-L. Qi, N. Schuch and J. I. Cirac, Quantum chaos in the Brownian SYK model with large finite N: OTOCs and tripartite information , JHEP 11 (2019) 038, [ 1908.00775]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    I. L. Aleiner, L. Faoro and L. B. Ioffe, Microscopic model of quantum butterfly effect: out-of-time-order correlators and traveling combustion waves , Annals of Physics 375 (2016) 378–406

    2016

  56. [64]

    Gu and A

    Y. Gu and A. Kitaev, On the relation between the magnitude and exponent of OTOCs , JHEP 02 (2019) 075, [ 1812.00120]

    2019 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Zhang, Y

    P. Zhang, Y. Gu and A. Kitaev, An obstacle to sub-AdS holography for SYK-like models , JHEP 21 (2020) 094, [ 2012.01620]

    2020 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Stanford, Z

    D. Stanford, Z. Yang and S. Yao, Subleading Weingartens, JHEP 02 (2022) 200, [2107.10252]

    2022 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Zhou, Generalized Lindblad master equation for measurement-induced phase transition, SciPost Phys

    Y.-N. Zhou, Generalized Lindblad master equation for measurement-induced phase transition, SciPost Phys. Core 6 (2023) 023, [ 2204.09049]. 20

    2023 arXiv

  60. [2024]

    arXiv:2408.11123, [ 2408.11123]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.