Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Designing a reliable lateral movement detector using a graph foundation model

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2504.13527 v1 pith:5KTLCK4B submitted 2025-04-18 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords foundationmodelscybersecuritydatagfmsbuildcasedetector
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Foundation models have recently emerged as a new paradigm in machine learning (ML). These models are pre-trained on large and diverse datasets and can subsequently be applied to various downstream tasks with little or no retraining. This allows people without advanced ML expertise to build ML applications, accelerating innovation across many fields. However, the adoption of foundation models in cybersecurity is hindered by their inability to efficiently process data such as network traffic captures or binary executables. The recent introduction of graph foundation models (GFMs) could make a significant difference, as graphs are well-suited to representing these types of data. We study the usability of GFMs in cybersecurity through the lens of one specific use case, namely lateral movement detection. Using a pre-trained GFM, we build a detector that reaches state-of-the-art performance without requiring any training on domain-specific data. This case study thus provides compelling evidence of the potential of GFMs for cybersecurity.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. REAL-IoT: Characterizing GNN Intrusion Detection Robustness under Practical Adversarial Attack

    cs.CR 2025-07 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    GNN-based intrusion detectors show lower accuracy on REAL-IoT's merged datasets, but the paper's own tables are inconsistent and the drift protocol is not a true distribution-shift test.

Pith tools