Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 45 references

Fabrication and characterization of boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN using STEM, EELS and electron ptychography

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Scanning monolayer hexagonal boron nitride with a 60 kV electron beam at high dose rate preferentially ejects nitrogen atoms, leaving stable triangular pores with boron-terminated edges.

desk verdict A credible room-temperature fabrication route for boron-terminated tetravacancies, but the dose-rate mechanism is confounded with total dose and frame selection; deserves peer review with a request for a controlled experiment. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14217 v2 pith:MRVN4BAQ submitted 2025-04-19 cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Dana O. Byrne , Stephanie M. Ribet , Demie Kepaptsoglou , Quentin M. Ramasse , Colin Ophus , Frances I. Allen This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords 2DhBNdefectengineeringnanoporesSTEMEELSptychographytetravacancyborontermination
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Monolayer hexagonal boron nitride is a membrane material whose usefulness in selective ion transport and neuromorphic computing would come from triangular nanopores with well-defined edge chemistry. This paper reports that the edge chemistry can be chosen by how fast the electron beam is scanned: at 60 kV in ultrahigh vacuum at room temperature, high-dose-rate scanning preferentially ejects nitrogen atoms, so the resulting triangular tetravacancies are lined with boron, while lower-dose scanning yields a mix of nitrogen-terminated, boron-terminated, and mixed-edge defects. The boron termination is identified two independent ways: Z-contrast in annular dark-field STEM and a pre-peak in the boron K-edge electron energy-loss spectrum. Electron ptychography shows the pore corners relax inward to a B-B distance near 1.9 Å, with enhanced phase around the rim that may reflect bonding-related charge redistribution. The paper's central claim is that dose rate acts like temperature: high dose rate at room temperature produces the same boron-terminated tetravacancies that previously required heating to about 500 °C.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on a controlled-etching mechanism plus a three-channel characterization chain. The mechanism is dose-rate-dependent inelastic damage: at 60 kV, below the elastic knock-on threshold, damage is governed by inelastic processes such as radiolysis and charging, and the paper proposes that raising the dose rate switches preferential ejection from boron (giving nitrogen-terminated pores) to nitrogen (giving boron-terminated pores). The shape itself is the first readout: triangular pores in hBN point in opposite directions depending on whether their edges are all boron or all nitrogen. Termination is then confirmed by (i) HAADF Z-contrast, where nitrogen columns are the brighter ones, and (ii) the boron K-edge EELS pre-peak, a chemical shift of the bulk $\pi^*$ peak caused by dangling bonds on edge boron atoms. Electron ptychography supplies the structural and electronic readout: the reconstructed atom maps show the pore corners contract to a B-B distance of about 1.9 Å, attributed to direct B-B bonding, and the enhanced phase around the perimeter is discussed as a possible map of charge redistribution.

What would settle it

A decisive test: keep the same total electron dose on a fresh hBN region but deliver it at low versus high dose rate by changing only the scan speed or beam current, then count the fraction of triangular defects that are boron-terminated; the dose-rate mechanism predicts a higher boron-termination fraction at the higher dose rate even at matched total dose.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that, in 60 kV STEM of monolayer hBN in UHV at room temperature, the electron dose rate selects which sublattice is etched: at high dose rates ($10^7$-$10^8$ e/nm$^2$/s) nitrogen atoms are preferentially ejected, so the growing triangular vacancy is terminated by boron, and the boron-terminated tetravacancy is the most stable high-dose product. The statistical evidence is 62 high-dose-rate scans with clearly identifiable edge termination: 44 had at least one boron-terminated defect and 16 had at least one nitrogen-terminated defect. Boron termination is confirmed independently by HAADF Z-contrast (nitrogen atoms appear brighter than boron) and by a pre-peak on the low-energy side of the boron K-edge $\pi^*$ peak, assigned to dangling bonds on undercoordinated edge boron atoms. Electron ptychography of three tetravacancies finds all of them boron terminated, measures corner B-B distances of ($1.9 \pm 0.1$) Å against 2.5 Å in the pristine lattice, consistent with direct B-B bonding after relaxation, and shows brighter phase around the pore perimeters, which the authors interpret cautiously as possible charge redistribution from bonding while noting atom motion and charging as alternative explanations.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the high dose rate itself causes the switch to nitrogen ejection, rather than some other difference between the low- and high-dose experiments, because total dose, scan area, beam current, and local defect history changed together with dose rate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN can be fabricated at room temperature by choosing high-dose-rate 60 kV STEM conditions in UHV, without heating the sample.
  • Edge termination can be read from the boron K-edge EELS: a pre-peak at the edge onset fingerprints boron-terminated pores, so termination does not have to be judged by contrast alone.
  • The relaxed corner contraction to about 1.9 Å means the pore rim is not a rigid hole; the reconstructed edge changes the local electronic environment, which should be included in models of ion transport and memristive response.
  • Because low-dose survey scans produced mixed and nitrogen-terminated defects, and some boron-terminated tetravacancies later reconfigured, the final defect state depends on the full irradiation history, not only on the fabrication scan.
  • If the equivalence with heating holds, high dose rate provides a room-temperature route to the defect structures previously obtained only at roughly 500 °C.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Testable extension the paper leaves open: the data do not yet isolate dose rate from total dose, since the low- and high-dose-rate regimes differ in accumulated dose, scan area, and beam current; an experiment that holds total dose constant while varying only dose rate would directly test whether rate, not dose, drives boron termination.
  • Going beyond the paper's interpretation: the enhanced ptychographic phase around pore rims could be tested quantitatively by computing the relaxed defect's charge density with first-principles methods, simulating the exit-wave phase shift, and comparing the predicted map with the measured one.
  • A further consequence the paper does not state: if the dose-rate mechanism acts through charging or radiolysis rather than local heating, the crossover dose rate should depend on the substrate and its conductivity, which could be checked by comparing hBN on metallic, semiconducting, and insulating supports.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports that high-dose-rate 60 kV STEM irradiation of monolayer hBN under UHV at room temperature preferentially produces boron-terminated tetravacancies, identified by HAADF-Z-contrast, boron K-edge EELS pre-peak fingerprinting, and electron ptychography. The authors compare low-dose-rate survey images (where a mixture of terminations and shapes is observed) with high-dose-rate scans (where boron-terminated defects dominate), and use ptychography to report structural relaxation at the defect corners and an enhanced phase signal around defect perimeters. The paper contextualizes the dose-rate dependence with prior literature, proposing a parallel between high dose rate and elevated temperature in driving nitrogen-atom ejection.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a potentially practical route to fabricate boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN, which are of interest for nanofluidic and neuromorphic applications, and it adds a multimodal characterization protocol (HAADF, monochromated EELS, ptychography) for identifying edge termination and probing local bonding. Strengths of the paper include the use of a scan-level dataset (62 scans, 44 with boron-terminated defects vs. 16 with nitrogen-terminated), reliance on an independently established EELS pre-peak fingerprint from Cretu et al., explicit reporting of all relevant beam parameters, and the use of open-source analysis tools (HyperSpy, py4DSTEM). The ptychographic observation of enhanced phase at the defect edge is intriguing and could be significant if confirmed as a bonding signature rather than an artifact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.1, statistics] The termination statistics are presented as raw scan counts ('44 of 62 scans had at least one frame with a boron-terminated defect, 16 with a nitrogen-terminated defect') without per-defect or per-frame normalization, without uncertainty estimates, and without a comparable count for the low-dose condition. Additionally, 44 + 16 = 60, leaving two of the 62 scans unaccounted for. The analysis also selects only frames with 'minimal defect movement' and only defects whose termination could be 'clearly identified', which may systematically exclude mobile nitrogen-terminated or mixed-termination defects. These issues weaken the quantitative comparison between conditions, though the raw association between the high-dose protocol and boron-terminated defects remains plausible.
  2. [Section 3.3 / Abstract] The ptychographic claim of 'enhanced electron density around the defect perimeters indicative of bonding effects' is not sufficiently distinguished from known artifacts. The paper notes that lattice distortion attributable to charging is visible in the reconstruction (Figure S3) and that atom movement at open edges is a possible cause of the brightness enhancement, yet the abstract and conclusions state the bonding interpretation as a likely result. Since ptychographic phase enhancements can arise from drift, charging, or atomic displacement during acquisition, the 'indication of bonding' statement needs a control analysis, such as comparison to multislice simulations including charging/displacement models, or a stability test across frames with different scan directions. Without such a control, this part of the central characterization claim is not yet established.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The sentence 'Here were use electron irradiation...' contains a typo: 'were use' should be 'we use'.
  2. [Section 3.1] The phrase 'identification of stable defect states was often challenging' directly undercuts the reliability of the termination counts; this caveat should be reflected in the error analysis or in the strength of the stated preference.
  3. [Section 2.3] The ptychographic length-scale calibration is described as measuring a mean B–B distance of (2.65 ± 0.10) Å in the reconstruction and then scaling to the literature value 2.51 Å; this procedure is reasonable, but the uncertainty in the scaling factor should be propagated into the reported corner B–B contraction of (1.9 ± 0.1) Å, especially because the reconstruction shows distortion attributed to charging.
  4. [Section 3.2 / Table 1] Table 1 would be easier to interpret if the row for 'This work' included the dose-rate values and vacuum level, since those are the parameters used to distinguish this study from Prior STEM work at 500 °C.
  5. [References] Reference [31] should be formatted as 'SciPy' rather than 'Scipy' for consistency with the software's official name.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are direct experimental observations with independent calibration references.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are empirical observations rather than derivations, so the circularity patterns do not apply. Defect edge terminations are assigned from HAADF Z-contrast and from a boron K-edge pre-peak whose fingerprint is taken from independent prior work by Cretu et al. (Ref. [14]); it is not fitted here. The EELS energy-axis alignment uses the B-N pi* peak from the authors' earlier work (Ref. [29]), but this is a routine spectral calibration and is not load-bearing for any conclusion. The ptychographic length scale is set by measuring the mean B-B distance in the reconstruction and then scaling to the literature lattice constant of 2.51 Å (Ref. [34]); this is standard calibration, and the reported corner B-B contraction of ~1.9 Å is measured after that scaling, so the claimed relaxation is not an input of the calibration. The dose-rate claim that higher dose rates favor nitrogen atom ejection and boron-terminated defects is a direct experimental statistic (44 of 62 high-dose scans with boron-terminated defects vs. 16 with nitrogen-terminated), not a quantity derived from any fitted parameter or defining equation. The confound concerns raised by the skeptic — differing accumulated dose, beam current, scan area, and selection of 'stable' frames — are threats to causal inference and experimental design, not circularity. Self-citations (Refs. [28], [29], [33]) provide sample preparation, energy calibration, and software tools, but none is used to force the paper's conclusions. No circular step can be exhibited by quoting an equation or construction that reduces to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main claims rest on standard microscopy contrast interpretations (HAADF Z-contrast), prior literature assignment of the EELS pre-peak to B-terminated edges, and an internal ptychographic length calibration. No new entities or fitted parameters are introduced; the riskiest interpretive assumption is attributing the ptychographic perimeter contrast to bonding rather than charging or drift artifacts.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption HAADF Z-contrast distinguishes B from N atoms, with N appearing brighter.
    Used in Section 3.1 to assign edge termination; relies on standard atomic-number contrast in annular dark-field imaging.
  • domain assumption The boron K-edge pre-peak is a fingerprint of boron-terminated edges.
    Introduced via citation to Cretu et al. [14]; the paper uses this assignment to support termination identification in EELS.
  • domain assumption The ptychographic reconstruction and internal length calibration (measured bulk B-B 2.65 Å scaled to literature 2.51 Å) faithfully represent atomic positions.
    Section 2.3 and Figure S3; assumes the single-slice stochastic gradient descent reconstruction is free of significant distortion except where charging artifacts are acknowledged.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed termination preference is caused by dose rate rather than by confounded variables such as total dose, vacuum quality, or He-ion pre-seeding.
    Interpretive claim in Sections 3.1 and 3.2; low- and high-dose-rate experiments differ in multiple parameters and the comparison to literature [18] shows vacuum sensitivity, so the dose-rate attribution is not uniquely established.
  • ad hoc to paper The enhanced ptychographic phase around defect perimeters reflects charge redistribution due to bonding rather than charging, drift, or atom movement.
    Section 3.3; the authors explicitly list alternative explanations and cite Hofer et al. [41] for the bonding interpretation, but do not provide a quantitative test that excludes artifacts.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fabrication and characterization of boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN using STEM, EELS and electron ptychography." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MRVN4BAQ

@misc{pith2026250414217,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fabrication and characterization of boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN using STEM, EELS and electron ptychography},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MRVN4BAQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14217}
}
read the original abstract

Tetravacancies in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) with consistent edge termination (boron or nitrogen) form triangular nanopores with electrostatic potentials that can be leveraged for applications such as selective ion transport and neuromorphic computing. In order to quantitatively predict the properties of these structures, an atomic-level understanding of their local electronic and chemical environments is required. Moreover, robust methods for their precision manufacture are needed. Here were use electron irradiation in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) at high dose rate to drive the formation of boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN. Characterization of the defects is achieved using aberration-corrected STEM, monochromated electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS), and electron ptychography. Z-contrast in STEM and chemical fingerprinting by core-loss EELS enable identification of the edge terminations, while electron ptychography gives insight into structural relaxation of the tetravacancies and provides evidence of enhanced electron density around the defect perimeters indicative of bonding effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14217 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) HAADF-STEM survey showing vacancy defects in hBN after scanning at low dose rate. A number of defects are circled to indicate those with predominantly nitrogen termination (blue), boron termination (orange), and mixed edge termination (pink). (b-c) High magnification HAADF-STEM images of a monovacancy and a tetravacancy, respectively, acquired at high dose rate with edge atom models overlaid. These defects are b… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Boron K-edge EEL spectrum imaging of a boron￾terminated tetravacancy comparing the signal from inside the defect vs. outside the defect, normalized to the 𝜎* peak (see Fig. S2). The gray dashed line marks the energy of the 𝜋* peak from the bulk lattice, while the red dashed line indicates the energy at which a shifted pre-peak appears. (b) Corresponding HAADF-STEM image. (c) Score map for the pre-peak feature ob… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Ptychographic reconstructions of boron-terminated tetravacancies in monolayer hBN with atomic map overlays. (b) Positions of the boron and nitrogen atoms around the defect edges as identified from the reconstructions. Dashed lines mark the B–B distances in the corner regions of the defects, measured in Ångström with a standard deviation of 0.1 Å. of boron-terminated tetravacancies elsewhere [15] and has been att… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Directimagingoflatticeatomsandtopological defects in graphene membranes.Nano Lett., 8(11):3582–3586, 2008

    Jannik C Meyer, C Kisielowski, R Erni, Marta D Rossell, M F Crommie,andAZettl. Directimagingoflatticeatomsandtopological defects in graphene membranes.Nano Lett., 8(11):3582–3586, 2008. doi: 10.1021/nl801386m

    work page doi:10.1021/nl801386m 2008

  2. [2]

    Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy.Nature, 464(7288):571–574, 2010

    OndrejLKrivanek,MatthewFChisholm,ValeriaNicolosi,TimothyJ Pennycook, George J Corbin, Niklas Dellby, Matthew F Murfitt, Christopher S Own, Zoltan S Szilagyi, Mark P Oxley, Sokrates T Pantelides, and Stephen J Pennycook. Atom-by-atom structural and chemical analysis by annular dark-field electron microscopy.Nature, 464(7288):571–574, 2010. doi: 10.1038/nature08879

    doi:10.1038/nature08879 2010

  3. [3]

    Graphene at the edge: Stability and dynamics

    Caglar O Girit, Jannik C Meyer, Rolf Erni, Marta D Rossell, C Kisielowski, Li Yang, Cheol-Hwan Park, M F Crommie, Marvin L Cohen, Steven G Louie, and A Zettl. Graphene at the edge: Stability and dynamics. Science, 323(5922):1705–1708, 2009. doi: 10.1126/ science.1166999

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Quantifying trans- missionelectronmicroscopyirradiationeffectsusingtwo-dimensional materials

    Toma Susi, Jannik C Meyer, and Jani Kotakoski. Quantifying trans- missionelectronmicroscopyirradiationeffectsusingtwo-dimensional materials. Nature Reviews Physics,1(6):397–405,2019. doi:10.1038/ s42254-019-0058-y

    work page 2019

  5. [6]

    Directed atom-by-atom assembly of dopants insilicon

    Bethany M Hudak, Jiaming Song, Hunter Sims, M Claudia Tro- parevsky, Travis S Humble, Sokrates T Pantelides, Paul C Snijders, and Andrew R Lupini. Directed atom-by-atom assembly of dopants insilicon. ACS Nano,12(6):5873–5879,2018. doi:10.1021/acsnano. 8b02001

    doi:10.1021/acsnano 2018

  6. [7]

    Engineeringsingle-atomdynamicswith electron irradiation

    CongSu,MukeshTripathi,Qing-BoYan,ZegaoWang,ZihanZhang, Christoph Hofer, Haozhe Wang, Leonardo Basile, Gang Su, Ming- dong Dong, Jannik C Meyer, Jani Kotakoski, Jing Kong, Juan-Carlos Idrobo,TomaSusi,andJuLi. Engineeringsingle-atomdynamicswith electron irradiation. Sci. Adv., 5(5):eaav2252, 2019. doi: 10.1126/ sciadv.aav2252

    work page 2019

  7. [8]

    Identifying and manipulating single atoms with scanning transmission electron microscopy

    Toma Susi. Identifying and manipulating single atoms with scanning transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 58(88):12274– 12285, 2022. doi: 10.1039/d2cc04807h

    work page doi:10.1039/d2cc04807h 2022

  8. [9]

    The atomic drill bit: Precision controlled atomic fabricationof2Dmaterials

    Matthew G Boebinger, Courtney Brea, Li-Ping Ding, Sudhajit Misra, Olugbenga Olunloyo, Yiling Yu, Kai Xiao, Andrew R Lupini, Feng Ding,GuoxiangHu,PanchapakesanGanesh,StephenJesse,andRay- mond R Unocic. The atomic drill bit: Precision controlled atomic fabricationof2Dmaterials. Adv. Mater.,35(14):e2210116,2023. doi: 10.1002/adma.202210116

    work page doi:10.1002/adma.202210116 2023

Show all 45 references
  1. [10]

    Fab- rication of a freestanding boron nitride single layer and its defect assignments

    Chuanhong Jin, Fang Lin, Kazu Suenaga, and Sumio Iijima. Fab- rication of a freestanding boron nitride single layer and its defect assignments. Phys. Rev. Lett., 102(19):195505, 2009. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.102.195505

    2009

  2. [11]

    Selective sputtering and atomic resolution imaging of atomically thin boron nitride membranes.Nano Lett., 9 (7):2683–2689, 2009

    Jannik C Meyer, Andrey Chuvilin, Gerardo Algara-Siller, Johannes Biskupek, and Ute Kaiser. Selective sputtering and atomic resolution imaging of atomically thin boron nitride membranes.Nano Lett., 9 (7):2683–2689, 2009. doi: 10.1021/nl9011497

    2009 doi

  3. [12]

    Atomicallythinhexagonalboronnitrideprobed by ultrahigh-resolution transmission electron microscopy.Phys

    NasimAlem,RolfErni,ChristianKisielowski,MartaDRossell,Will Gannett,andAZettl. Atomicallythinhexagonalboronnitrideprobed by ultrahigh-resolution transmission electron microscopy.Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter , 80(15):155425, 2009. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB. 80.155425

    2009 doi

  4. [13]

    Atomic-scale dynamics of triangular hole growth in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride under electron irradiation

    Gyeong Hee Ryu, Hyo Ju Park, Junga Ryou, Jinwoo Park, Jongyeong Lee, Gwangwoo Kim, Hyeon Suk Shin, Christopher W Bielawski, Rodney S Ruoff, Suklyun Hong, and Zonghoon Lee. Atomic-scale dynamics of triangular hole growth in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride under electron irrad...

  5. [14]

    Tizei, Zheng Liu, and Kazutomo Suenaga

    Ovidiu Cretu, Yung Chang Lin, Masanori Koshino, Luiz H.G. Tizei, Zheng Liu, and Kazutomo Suenaga. Structure and local chemical properties of boron-terminated tetravacancies in hexagonal boron nitride. Physical Review Letters , 114(7), 2015. doi: 10.1103/ PhysRevLett.114.075502

    2015

  6. [15]

    Inelastic electron irradiation damage in hexagonal boron nitride.Micron, 72: 21–27, 2015

    Ovidiu Cretu, Yung-Chang Lin, and Kazutomo Suenaga. Inelastic electron irradiation damage in hexagonal boron nitride.Micron, 72: 21–27, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2015.02.002

    2015 doi

  7. [16]

    Formation and dynamics of electron-irradiation-induced defects in hexagonal boron nitride at elevated temperatures

    Thang Pham, Ashley L Gibb, Zhenglu Li, S Matt Gilbert, Chengyu Song, Steven G Louie, and Alex Zettl. Formation and dynamics of electron-irradiation-induced defects in hexagonal boron nitride at elevated temperatures. Nano Lett., 16(11):7142–7147, 2016. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolet...

    2016 doi

  8. [17]

    SMattGilbert,GabrielDunn,AminAzizi,ThangPham,BrianShevit- ski,EdgarDimitrov,StanleyLiu,ShaulAloni,andAlexZettl.Fabrica- tionofsubnanometer-precisionnanoporesinhexagonalboronnitride. Sci. Rep., 7(1):15096, 2017. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12684-x

    2017 doi

  9. [18]

    In- fluence of low-pressure atmosphere in the pores formed in hexagonal boron nitride under electron irradiation.BIO Web Conf., 129:22030,

    UmairJaved,ClaraKofler,ClemensMangler,andJaniKotakoski. In- fluence of low-pressure atmosphere in the pores formed in hexagonal boron nitride under electron irradiation.BIO Web Conf., 129:22030,

  10. [19]

    Stretch-inactivatediontransport through subnanoporous two-dimensional membranes

    YechanNohandAlexSmolyanitsky. Stretch-inactivatediontransport through subnanoporous two-dimensional membranes. Phys. Rev. Mater., 8(10), 2024. doi: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.8.l103001

    2024 doi

  11. [20]

    Synaptic-like plasticity in 2D nanofluidic memristor from competitive bicationic transport

    Yechan Noh and Alex Smolyanitsky. Synaptic-like plasticity in 2D nanofluidic memristor from competitive bicationic transport. Sci. Adv., 10(45):eadr1531, 2024. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adr1531

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    Crown ethers in graphene.Nat

    Junjie Guo, Jaekwang Lee, Cristian I Contescu, Nidia C Gallego, Sokrates T Pantelides, Stephen J Pennycook, Bruce A Moyer, and Matthew F Chisholm. Crown ethers in graphene.Nat. Commun., 5: 5389, 2014. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6389

    2014 doi

  13. [22]

    Directdetermi- nation of the chemical bonding of individual impurities in graphene

    Wu Zhou, Myron D Kapetanakis, Micah P Prange, Sokrates T Pan- telides,StephenJPennycook,andJuan-CarlosIdrobo. Directdetermi- nation of the chemical bonding of individual impurities in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109(20):206803, 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 109.206803

    2012 doi

  14. [23]

    Probing the bonding and electronic structure of single atom dopants in graphene with electron energy loss spectroscopy

    Quentin M Ramasse, Che R Seabourne, Despoina-Maria Kepapt- soglou, Recep Zan, Ursel Bangert, and Andrew J Scott. Probing the bonding and electronic structure of single atom dopants in graphene with electron energy loss spectroscopy. Nano Lett., 13(10):4989– 4995, 2013. doi: 10...

    2013 doi

  15. [24]

    Atomic-scale spec- troscopic imaging of the extreme-UV optical response of B- and N- doped graphene

    Fredrik S Hage, Myron D Kapetanakis, Juan-Carlos Idrobo, Quentin M Ramasse, and Demie Kepaptsoglou. Atomic-scale spec- troscopic imaging of the extreme-UV optical response of B- and N- doped graphene. Adv. Funct. Mater., 29(52):1901819, 2019. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201901819

    2019 doi

  16. [25]

    Single-atom vibrational spectroscopy in the scanning transmission electron microscope

    F S Hage, G Radtke, D M Kepaptsoglou, M Lazzeri, and Q M Ramasse. Single-atom vibrational spectroscopy in the scanning transmission electron microscope. Science, 367(6482):1124–1127,

  17. [26]

    Electron ptychography of 2D materials to deep sub-ångström resolution

    Yi Jiang, Zhen Chen, Yimo Han, Pratiti Deb, Hui Gao, Saien Xie, PrafullPurohit,MarkWTate,JiwoongPark,SolMGruner,VeitElser, and David A Muller. Electron ptychography of 2D materials to deep sub-ångström resolution. Nature, 559(7714):343–349, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0298-5

    2018 doi

  18. [27]

    Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron mi- croscopy (4D-STEM): From scanning nanodiffraction to ptychogra- phy and beyond.Microsc

    Colin Ophus. Four-dimensional scanning transmission electron mi- croscopy (4D-STEM): From scanning nanodiffraction to ptychogra- phy and beyond.Microsc. Microanal., 25(3):563–582, 2019

    2019

  19. [28]

    Atomicengineeringoftriangular nanoporesinmonolayerhBNformembraneapplications:Adecoupled seeding and growth approach.ACS Applied Nano Materials, 8:4565– 4572, 2025

    DanaO.ByrneandFrancesI.Allen. Atomicengineeringoftriangular nanoporesinmonolayerhBNformembraneapplications:Adecoupled seeding and growth approach.ACS Applied Nano Materials, 8:4565– 4572, 2025. doi: 10.1021/acsanm.4c06998

    2025 doi

  20. [29]

    Probing defectivity beneath the hydrocarbon blanket in 2D hBN using TEM-EELS.Mi- crosc

    Dana O Byrne, Jim Ciston, and Frances I Allen. Probing defectivity beneath the hydrocarbon blanket in 2D hBN using TEM-EELS.Mi- crosc. Microanal.,30(4):650–659,2024. doi:10.1093/mam/ozae064

    2024 doi

  21. [30]

    hyperspy/hyperspy: v2.3.0, March 2025

    Francisco de la Peña et al. hyperspy/hyperspy: v2.3.0, March 2025

    2025

  22. [31]

    Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J

    Pauli Virtanen, Ralf Gommers, Travis E. Oliphant, Matt Haberland, Tyler Reddy, David Cournapeau, Evgeni Burovski, Pearu Peterson, Warren Weckesser, Jonathan Bright, Stéfan J. van der Walt, Matthew Brett, Joshua Wilson, K. Jarrod Millman, Nikolay Mayorov, Andrew R. J. Nelson, E...

    2020

  23. [32]

    py4dstem: A software package for four-dimensional scanning transmission electron microscopy data analysis

    Benjamin H Savitzky, Steven E Zeltmann, Lauren A Hughes, Hamish G Brown, Shiteng Zhao, Philipp M Pelz, Thomas C Pekin, Edward S Barnard, Jennifer Donohue, Luis Rangel DaCosta, Ellis Kennedy, Yujun Xie, Matthew T Janish, Matthew M Schneider, Patrick Herring, Chirranjeevi Gopal,...

    2021

  24. [33]

    Iterative phase retrieval algorithms for scanning transmission electron microscopy

    Georgios Varnavides, Stephanie M Ribet, Steven E Zeltmann, Yue Yu, Benjamin H Savitzky, Dana O Byrne, Frances I Allen, Vinayak P Dravid, Mary C Scott, and Colin Ophus. Iterative phase retrieval algorithms for scanning transmission electron microscopy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309...

    2023 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Anubhav Jain, Shyue Ping Ong, Geoffroy Hautier, Wei Chen, William Davidson Richards, Stephen Dacek, Shreyas Cholia, Dan Gunter, David Skinner, Gerbrand Ceder, and Kristin A. Persson. Commentary:Thematerialsproject:Amaterialsgenomeapproachto accelerating materials innovation.AP...

    2013

  26. [35]

    Atomically precise control of carbon insertion into hBN monolayer point vacancies using a focused electron beam guide

    Hyoju Park, Yi Wen, Sylvia Xin Li, Woojin Choi, Gun-Do Lee, Michael Strano, and Jamie H Warner. Atomically precise control of carbon insertion into hBN monolayer point vacancies using a focused electron beam guide. Small, 17(23):e2100693, 2021. doi: 10.1002/ smll.202100693

    2021

  27. [36]

    Ultramicroscopy,107(8):575–586,

    RFEgerton.Limitstothespatial,energyandmomentumresolutionof electronenergy-lossspectroscopy. Ultramicroscopy,107(8):575–586,

  28. [37]

    Spec- troscopic signatures of edge states in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Res., 12(7):1663–1667, 2019

    Chuang Gao, Lei Tao, Yu-Yang Zhang, Shixuan Du, Sokrates T Pantelides, Juan Carlos Idrobo, Wu Zhou, and Hong-Jun Gao. Spec- troscopic signatures of edge states in hexagonal boron nitride.Nano Res., 12(7):1663–1667, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s12274-019-2417-5

    2019 doi

  29. [38]

    Core-level spectroscopy of point defects in single layer h-BN.Phys

    KazuSuenaga,HarukaKobayashi,andMasanoriKoshino. Core-level spectroscopy of point defects in single layer h-BN.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108(7):075501, 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.075501

    2012 doi

  30. [39]

    Chemistry at graphene edges in the electron microscope

    Gregor T Leuthner, Toma Susi, Clemens Mangler, Jannik C Meyer, and Jani Kotakoski. Chemistry at graphene edges in the electron microscope. 2D Mater.,8(3):035023,2021. doi:10.1088/2053-1583/ abf624

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    Atomic configurations and energetics of vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride: First-principles total-energy calculations

    Susumu Okada. Atomic configurations and energetics of vacancies in hexagonal boron nitride: First-principles total-energy calculations. Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics , 80,

  32. [41]

    Penny- cook.Detectingchargetransferatdefectsin2Dmaterialswithelectron ptychography

    Christoph Hofer, Jacob Madsen, Toma Susi, and Timothy J. Penny- cook.Detectingchargetransferatdefectsin2Dmaterialswithelectron ptychography. Journal of Microscopy,2025. doi:10.1111/jmi.13404. Supplementary Information: Fabrication and characterization of boron-terminated tetra...

    2025 arXiv

  33. [2007]

    doi: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2006.11.005

    2006 doi

  34. [2009]

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.161404

    doi

  35. [2015]

    doi: 10.1039/c5nr01473e

    doi

  36. [2020]

    doi: 10.1126/science.aba1136

    doi

  37. [2024]

    doi: 10.1051/bioconf/202412922030

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.